Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Quarkonia spectroscopy at CDF Ulrich Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe for the CDF collaboration Heavy Quarkonia 2006 Content: X(3872) m( + - ) mass spectrum quantum numbers J PC search for b
2
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia2 huge inelastic cross-section: ¼ 5000 times bigger than for ) triggers are essential! events “polluted” by fragmentation tracks, underlying event, pile-up ) need precise tracking and good resolution Heavy quark physics at the Tevatron dedicated trigger for J/ ! + - : m( + - ) around m(J/ ) ) high quality J/ events with large statistics (channel J/ ! e + e - much more challenging in hadronic environment) lepton + track with large IP (semi-leptonic B decay) two tracks with large IP (hadronic B decay)
3
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia3 The X(3872) ) what is the X(3872)? charmonium? exotic? ! determine quantum numbers J PC m( + - ) sensitive to J PC use distribution of angles between decay particles to measure J PC 2S) ! J/ + - known resonance discovered 2003 by Belle in search for charmonium states m( + - ) spectrum compatible with 0 CDF PRL 96,102002 (2006) mass: m = 3871.3 § 0.7 § 0.4 MeV/c 2 CDF PRL 93,072001 (2004), width compatible with detector resolution < 2.3 MeV/c 2 Belle PRL 91,26001 (2003) No X ++ or X – -- CDF PRL 93,072001 (2004) No iso-partner X § BaBar PRD 71, 031501 (2005) Evidence for X ! J/ , J/ Belle hep-ex/0505037
4
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia4 m( + - ) mass spectrum for (2S) (2S) in same exclusive final state m( + - ) spectrum known: s-wave with small d-wave contribution e.g. model by Novikov-Shifman ) high precision data by CDF ) allows to discriminate between models
5
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia5 The m( + - ) mass spectrum if ( + - ) in s-wave state: shape needs to be modelled e.g. multipole expansions for if ( + - ) in p-wave state: shape follows Breit-Wigner e.g. decay via 0 ! + - m( + - ) favours high end of mass spectrum ) compatible with intermediate 0 ! + - resonance also 3 S 1 multipole-expansion for charmonium possible no charmonium candidate at that mass 3 S 1 also has J PC = 1 - - ) non-observation by BES ( (e + e - )B( + - J/ ) < 10 eV @90% C.L. ) notation: n 2s+1 L J (J PC ) Phys.Lett.B579:74-78 (2004) Mass spectrum sensitive to J PC
6
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia6 The m( + - ) mass spectrum Possible 0 - mixing: mass contribution far from pole position interference 0 $ possible ) L=0 and L=1 both compatible with m( + - ) spectrum ) mixing phase of 95 ± describes data for broad resonances ( 0 ): kinematic quantities vary across width introduce form-factor e.g. Blatt-Weisskopf depends on ang. momentum L, effective range R ) affects shape for L=0, L=1
7
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia7 example: J PC assumptions Determination of J PC (1) definition of angular variables:
8
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia8 Determination of J PC (2) Predictions for kinematic decay quantities from helicity formalism: ) decay chain as sequential 2-body decays X(3872) ! J/ ( + - ) s,p ! + - + - need: one matrix element per decay vertex propagators to connect vertices matrix elements: angular part A and kinetic part T assume state with lowest L dominates, neglect others dedicated simulation for each J PC hypothesis (including detector effects) compare to angular distributions measured in data via 2
9
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia9 Determination of J PC (3) Limitations from helicity formalism: no model-independent description of + - in s-wave Breit-Wigner for 0 ! + - depends on form-factor details ) fix m distribution to match the data ) analyse angular distributions only N.B. 0 and have both J PC = 1 - - ) angular distributions not affected by potential interference J PC = 1 -+ and 2 -+ : multiple sub-states with same L contribute ) Can an arbitrary mixture describe the data?
10
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia10 Result for (2S) obtain expected result: J PC = 1 - - Exploit correlations between angles via 3D fit: 3 bins in 2 bins in J/ 2 bins in
11
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia11 Result for X(3872) Only J PC = 1 ++ or 2 -+ compatible with data! All other tested hypotheses excluded by > 3
12
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia12 What is the X(3872) ?? Charmonium ? potential candidates: but: decay via 0 : isospin violating mass predictions from potential models ¼ 50-100 MeV/c 2 off exotic? m(X) ¼ m(D 0 ) + m(D 0 *) ! coincidence? charmed molecule ? ( or or...) hybrid state, i.e. ? (but expected above ¼ 4 GeV/c 2 ) mainly charmonium - but interaction with ? notation: 2s+1 L J (J PC ) e.g. M. Suzuki hep-ph/0508258
13
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia13 X(3872) with neural networks Use sophisticated neural networks for “next generation” X(3872) analyses: exploit correlations between variables ! improved candidate selection train networks for multiple J PC assignments further handle to test hypotheses: “good” hypotheses ! higher significance to be used in likelihood analyses strong suppression of combinatorial BG ! to be used in search for partner of X(3872) in B system:
14
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia14 Search for b (1) ground state of system test NRQCD: ~30-160 MeV/c 2 lighter than not yet observed, searches: LEP ! b CLEO 2 evidence from CDF RunI search in exclusive final state: b ! J/ J/ ! + - + - J PC : 0 -+ ! 1 - - 1 - - BR( ! ¼ 40% R c ! ) ¼ 3¢ 10 -3 expect BR ¼ 7¢ 10 -5 – 7¢ 10 -3 Phys. Rev. D 63, 094006 (2001)
15
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia15 Search for b (2) use 1.1 fb -1 data from J/ ! + - trigger candidate selection: b ! J/ J/ 2 of vertex fit < 18.5 | | < 0.6 p t ( b ) > 3 GeV/c J/ (1): J/ ! + - trigger | | < 0.6 p t (J/ ) > 3 GeV/c p t ( § ) > 2.0 GeV/c J/ (2): + track p t (J/ ) > 3 GeV/c p t ( § ) > 2 GeV/c (| |<0.6) or > 3.5GeV/c (0.6 < | | < 1.0) p t (track) > 1.5 GeV/c dE/dx residual < 3.7 (track) p t (J/ ) > 50 GeV/c
16
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia16 Search for b (3) after cuts: 3 candidates observed in 9.0 – 9.5 GeV/c 2, expect 3.6 background events ) no significant evidence of b ) upper limit on b production cross-section
17
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia17 Conclusions & Outlook Tevatron and CDF performing well, rich B physics programme New results on X(3872): 3D angular analysis: J PC = 1 ++ or 2 -+ m( + - ): both L=0 or L=1 transition via 0 compatible with data ) cannot exclude J hypotheses from m( + - ) possibly 0 $ interference with =95 ± ) both charmonium and exotic interpretation still “in the game” further analyses using neural networks started ongoing search for in molecular picture: expect further states similar to X(3872), e.g. Search for b ! J/ J/ no signal observed, upper limit on production cross section
18
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia18 BACKUP
19
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia19 1 fb -1 delivered June 2005 15-20 pb -1 /week delivered before spring 2006 shutdown Tevatron Run 2 1 fb -1 delivered analyses presented use 0.3 – 1.0 fb -1 (“good data”)
20
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia20 CDF D0 Tevatron Main injector and recycler RunI: 1992 – 1996 data taking period at RunII: 2001 – 2009 major upgrades to collider and detectors The Tevatron
21
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia21 Tevatron performance Running well - both peak luminosity and integrated luminosity before spring 2006 shutdown: ~15-20 pb -1 / week delivered 1 fb -1 delivered in beginning of June 2005. 1 fb -1
22
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia22 precise tracking: silicon vertex detector and drift chamber important for B physics: direct trigger for displaced vertices, J/ ! + - The CDF detector
23
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia23 Physics at the Tevatron large b production rates: ) 10 3 times bigger than ! spectrum quickly falling with p t Heavy and excited states not produced at B factories: enormous inelastic cross-section: ) triggers are essential events “polluted” by fragmentation tracks, underlying events ) need precise tracking and good resolution!
24
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia24 Dedicated trigger J/ ! + - trigger events where m( - ) around m(J/ ) high quality J/ events large statistics available N.B. channel J/ ! e + e - much more challenging in complex hadronic environment! Evaluate muon chamber info on trigger level:
25
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia25 X(3872) with J/ ! e + e - Reconstruction of J/ ! e + e - very difficult in complex hadronic environment dedicated J/ ! e + e - trigger use neural-network based approach to identify soft e § (p t > 2GeV/c) reject e § from conversions based on neural network approach add at J/ vertex to accommodate Bremsstrahlung X(3872) reconstructions follows J/ ! + - case ) able to reconstruct X(3872) in this channel! strong radiative tail
26
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia26 ) X(3872) behaves similarly to the (2S) (with given uncertainties) X(3872) production fraction from B fraction from B decays: 2S): 28.3 § 1.0 (stat.) § 0.7 (syst.) % X(3872): 16.1 § 4.9 (stat.) § 1.0 (syst.)%
27
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia27 The m( + - ) mass spectrum Distribution of m( + - ) constrains quantum numbers J PC shape depends on: decay of ( + - ) sub-system: ( + - ) in s or p wave (i.e. intermediate sub-resonance or not) relative angular momentum between ( + - ) and ( + - ) (and detector acceptance, efficiency, etc.) e.g. for decay chain: X ! J/ 0 ; 0 ! + - for broad resonances (kinematic factors vary across width) form-factor spectrum described by Breit – Wigner function
28
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia28 The m( + - ) mass spectrum Challenge: Large background, rather low X(3872) yield ) sideband-subtraction difficult, instead: “slicing technique” impose bin borders in m( + - ) as additional cuts fit resulting ( + - + - ) mass spectrum obtained yield shows variation with m( + - ) need to be careful at kinematic borders
29
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia29 Influence of form-factor on m( + - ) use: model from Blatt-Weiskopf: parameter “R” determines effective size, no unique choice
30
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia30 Mixing phase between and good fit probability found for relative phase 95 Relatively small influence of 0 form-factor radius, large effect from X(3872) form-factor radius.
31
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia31 Effect of 0 - mixing ) Neither L=0 nor L=1 can be ruled out from m( + - ) alone
32
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia32 Illustration of angular correlation example for J PC = 1 ++
33
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia33 Sample fit for X(3872) angular analysis
34
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia34 Helicity matrix element treat initial and final state in respective rest-frame two body decay: are back-to-back common quantisation axis ) final state helicity = 1 - 2 using Wigner D functions assume lowest angular momentum L is dominant
35
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia35 Transition weight from Helicity matrix element mean over initial state incoherent sum over final states coherent sum over intermediate states in case of several substates: coherent sum contains a priori unknown mixing constant g LS
36
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia36 X(3872) fit results
37
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia37 Systematics for X(3872) systematics: 13 – 17: details of MC 12: use phase-space to describe m( ) 10, 11: vary 0 form-factor radius 6-9: vary X(3872) mean and width 4,5: vary histogram bin width 2,3: vary X(3872) fit window 1: default result
38
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia38 2S) fit results
39
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia39 Systematics for (2S) systematics: 13 – 17: details of MC 6,7 : vary (2S) mean and width 4,5: vary histogram bin width 2,3: vary (2S) fit window 1: default result
40
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia40 Detector effects Detector acceptance, resolution and cuts affect angular variables: for J PC = 1 ++ for J PC = 1 -- original after simulation left: 1 ++ right: 1 --
41
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia41 possible formation of “molecules”: decay via: Charmed molecule? e.g. DeRujula, Georgi, Glashow (1977) ? binding by 0 Törnqvist Phys. Lett. B590, 209-215 (2004) Swanson Phys. Lett. B588, 189-195 (2004) 00 similar to deuteron: small attractive force mediated by 0 predict J PC = 1 ++ or 0 -+ isospin breaking via 0 ! + - allowed Swanson: additional contribution from 0, only J PC = 1 ++
42
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia42 „Deuson“ model (Törnqvist) 00 X(3872) similar to deuteron: composed of two objects bound by 0 exchange Prediction: J PC = 1 ++ or 0 -+ (otherwise potential too weak or repulsive) small binding energy: narrow resonance, big object isospin breaking: X ! J/ 0, 0 ! + - allowed X ! J/ forbidden for any isoscalar X ! J/ 0 0 forbidden
43
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia43 Further properties by B-factories BaBar: search for charged partner X § ! J/ § expect twice the rate if X is part of iso-triplett ) no signal found Belle: 4 evidence for decay X(3872) ! J/ evidence for decay X! J/ + ) Swanson: 1 ++ has contribution of X ! J/ , ! + search for X! c1 , X! c2 ) no signal found C = +1 (hep-ph/0311229) (hep-ex/0505037) (hep-ex/0408083)
44
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia44 Excited B mesons narrow: ~ 10 MeV/c 2 broad : ~ 100 MeV/c 2 similar picture for B s ** Heavy Quark Effective Theory: hydrogen atom like system with heavy + light quark
45
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia45 Exclusive B d ** experimental observable: Q = m(B ** ) – m(B) – m( ) (free remaining kinetic energy) focus on narrow states: B 1 ! B * B 2 * ! B B 2 * ! B * ( not reconstructed) exclusive analysis ) high resolution
46
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia46 Exclusive B ** observable:Q = m(B ** ) – m(B) – m( ) (free remaining kinetic energy) focus on narrow states: B 1, B 2 * ! B * B 2 * ! B HQET: hydrogen atom like system with heavy + light quark Towards B s ¤¤ : similar to B d ¤¤ : B s ¤¤ ! B § K ¨ situation much less clear: signal so far from DELPHI, OPAL, D0 exclusive B § ! J/ K §, B § ! D § sophisticated neural networks to suppress background expect result ~summer
47
June 2006U.Kerzel, University of Karlsruhe ---- Workshop on Heavy Quarkonia47 Towards B s ** Delphi Conf 2005-011 Conf 731 B s ¤ ¤ ! B § K ¨ observed by: DELPHI (inclusive) D0 (exclusive) OPAL (inclusive) D0Note 5027-Conf Rare signal dominated by large background ! deploy sophisticated neural networks B § ! J/ K §, B § ! D § B s ¤ ¤ resonant signal vs. combinatorial background ) expect CDF result this summer Z. Phys. C66 (1995) 19
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.