1. Soc 319: Sociological Approaches to Social Psychology Group Cohesion/Conformity April 7, 2009

2. Group Cohesion and Conformity A. What is a group? A social unit with two or more persons, and which has: Common goals: members share at least one common goal to be achieved through joint action. Interaction: members communicate with and influence one another. Normative expectations: members share a set of expectations about group norms and members’ roles. Identification: members consciously identify with the group and think of themselves as members.

3. Examples of non-groups vs. groups Is not a group Is a group

4. B. Majority Influence and Conformity Conformity: Adherence by an individual to group norms. Involves a change in behavior or beliefs as a result of real or imagined group pressure. Not universal! Informational influence: Sherif (1936) autokinetic effect study Normative influence: Asch (1952) and replications (e.g., Bond & Smith, 1996)

5. Sherif autokinetic effect study

6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKivdMAgdeA

8. C. Under What Conditions Do People Conform? Size of majority (+) Unanimity (+) Value/admire group (+) Commitment to long- term interaction (+) Culture of collectivism (+) Confident in expertise on issue (-) Social status (-) * Strongly committed to their initial view (-) Do not like or respect source of influence (-) Culture of individualism (-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ_nM5NkQzs&feature=related

10. D. How do groups react to dissenters? 1. Group efforts to manage “deviants” Apply pressure to make “deviant” conform Persuasion  threats  punishments Reject the deviant from the group. Expel from group Status degradation Psychological isolation

11. D. How do groups react to dissenters? (cont’d) 2. Minority fights back! “Active minority” might try to persuade majority group members to accept their viewpoint and adopt a new position (Moscovici, 1980). Influence of minority contingent upon: Size. >1 person. Consistency. Implies that the minority has a well- articulated and thoughtful position. Flexible negotiation style. Rigid negotiation style suggests that minority is inflexible and dogmatic. Similarity of identity (recall P-O-X model)

12. E. Groupthink 1. Definition. A mode of thinking and decision-making by group members where pressures for unanimity and cohesiveness overwhelm the group members’ motivation to appraise realistically the alternative courses of action (Janis 1972). “Illusion of consensus” 2. Examples: a. Cuban missile crisis b. Challenger disaster 3. Characteristics 4. Possible solutions

13. A. Intergroup Conflict: Actual conflict 1. Definition: conflict is the result of direct competition over resources a. Historical data b. Experimental data i. Sherif Robber’s Cave study.

14. B. How do groups differentiate themselves from one another? 1. Minimal group a. Tajfel studies No social interaction between groups No shared goals Participants unaware of others’ group membership 2. Social identity theory a. Studies of ethnic identity and language (e.g., Brown, 1988)