Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 3MRA.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 3MRA."— Presentation transcript:

1 Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 3MRA

2 2 The HWIR Question At what constituent concentration will wastes, when placed in non-hazardous waste management units over the unit’s life, result in: 1) greater than A% of the people living within B distance of the facility experiencing a risk/hazard of C or less and 2) greater than D% of the habitats within E distance of the facility with an ecological hazard less than F, at G% of facilities nationwide?

3 Land Application Unit 3MRA Question: Concentration in Effluent, prior to disposal?

4 LAKE WBN Rch 1 WS Sub 1 WS Sub 2 WS Sub 3 WS Sub 4 WBN Rch 2 WBN Rch 3 WBN Rch 4 BG1 BG2 Src 1 Farm 1 Farm 2 Hab 1 Hab 2 Range 1 Range 2 Range 3 Range 1 Range 2 Range 3 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 9 1112 10 8 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 LWS=Local Watershed Vad=Vadose Zone Aqu=Aquife r WSSub=Watershed Subbasin HumRcp=Human Receptor Ring=Distance BG=Population Block Group Range=Ecological Range Rch=Water Body Reach Hab=Ecological Habitat Src=Source WBN=Water Body Network =Well Location GIS-Based Site-Specific Conceptual Site Model

5 5 3MRA Module Connectivity Transport Exposure/Risk Foodchain Sources AT SI LAU LF WP AIR WS VZ SW AQ TF AF FF EE ER HE HR

6 Source Air Vad 1 Aqu 1Aqu 2 Rch 1Rch 2Rch 3Rch 4 WSSub 1WSSub 2WSSub 3WSSub 4 Farm 1 Vad 2 Farm 2 WBN 1 Ring 1 Ring 2 Ring 3 LWS 1LWS 2 Range 1Range 2Range 3 Hab 1 Range 1Range 2Range 3 Hab 2 HumRcp 1 HumRcp 2 HumRcp 3 HumRcp 4 HumRcp 5 HumRcp 6 HumRcp 7 HumRcp 8 HumRcp 9 HumRcp 10 HumRcp 11 HumRcp 12 BG 1 HumRcp 13 HumRcp 14 HumRcp 15 HumRcp 16 HumRcp 17 HumRcp 18 HumRcp 19 HumRcp 20 BG 2 8 3 8 N N connections 2 connections 1 connection 128 8 9 Ring 2 Ring 3 12 8 WSSub=Watershed Subbasin LWS=Local Watershed Vad=Vadose Zone Aqu=Aquifer HumRcp=Human Receptor Ring=Distance BG=Population Block Group Range=Ecological Range Rch=Water Body Reach Hab=Ecological Habitat Conceptual Site Model Connections (one-tenth scale)

7 7 GIS Site-Specific Spacial Overlays Slide Based on Research Triangle Institute

8 8 Data Collection Approach Aquatic food web Farm food chain/terrestrial food web Aquifer Soil/vadose zone Surface water Watershed and waterbody layout Meteorological Waste Properties Waste Management Unit NationalRegionalSite-BasedData Type

9 9 Data Collection Approach (Cont.) Ecological habitat type and location Ecological receptor Ecological benchmarks Human receptor type and location Human health benchmarks Biouptake/bioaccumulation factors Chemical properties Ecological exposure factors Human exposure factors NationalRegionalSite-BasedData Type

10 10 Potential Dimensionality for HWIR National Assessment Realization (10000) Source Types (5) Site (201) Waste Level (5) Chemical (36) Receptor Type (9) Pathways (13) Cohort (6) Distances (3) Time (10000 yrs) Receptor Locations (677)Risk Bins (7) Risk Measure (2) Total Simulations (1,809,000,000) Total Numbers Potentially Stored (3.6e19) Total Bytes (14 Billion 10 GB hard drives) SimulationsStorage

11 11 Roll-Up of Output Results Source Type (landfill, aerated tank, waste pile, stacks, etc.) Chemical (organics, metals, radionuclides) Exit Level Concentration (from Plant to Waste Site, or from Waste Site) Location Receptor Type (child, resident adult, farmer, fisherman, wildlife, aquatic life, etc.) Transport Pathway (air, aquifer, river) Exposure Pathway Risk Measure [HQ oral, HQ inhalation, Risk oral, risk inhalation]

12 12 Outputs from the HWIR Risk Visualization Processor

13 13 SUMMARYSUMMARY Protection of Human Health and Environment Practical and Cost-Effective Application of Risk-Based Decision-Making Consistent and Technically Defensible Tools to Support the Process Site-Specific or National Basis Framework Designed to meet intent of the HWIR Technology Software System:

14 14 3MRA Storyboard Where to get 3MRA software EPA CEAM site How to enable 3MRA to run with FRAMES 2.0 Copy hwirio.dll from FRAMES 2.0 subdirectory to c:\3mra Copy import.0.hdssf to c:\3MRA\ssf for convenience How to import a 3MRA simulation into FRAMES 2.0 Use the 3MRA import tool What is produced by 3MRA models. Example output from Site Visualization processor

15 15 Copy HWIRIO.dll to c:\3mra Copy 3mra\import.0.hdssf to c:\3mra\ssf for convenience

16 16

17 17

18 18 The original SUI is presented but the underlying reading/writing is FRAMES 2.0

19 19 Choose hdtest.ssf. If not available type in hdtest.ssf. Only hdtest.ssf will work for the filename.

20 20 Use 0114001, Benzene, WP, CW=4 for speed sake. Any should work

21 21 Make sure you are only running one realization for speed sake

22 22 Pressing start will generate the case

23 23 Bring up the FRAMES simulation editor

24 24 Open the sim from the c:\3mra\ssf directory. Movement to FRAMESV2 is probably better.

25 25 FRAMESV2 now has the CSM drawn for you. The Simulation is ready to Go.

26 26 After waiting a little bit, the simulation comes back all green. File->Save to write the data to the files.

27 27 FRAMES 2.0 result 3MRA Result

28 28 A graphical form of the result from a viewer in FRAMES 3MRA not in 2.0 yet


Download ppt "Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 3MRA."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google