1. 1 Workshop Goals DELAMAN and DAM-LR Peter Wittenburg MPI for Psycholinguistics Access Management Nijmegen November 2004

2. 2 When did we start? it is just 5 years that we started in our discipline speaking about – large digital online collections – standardizing the formats XML was new and users were very skeptical MPEG was and is something still not well understood – open metadata to come to browsable and searchable domains – using metadata to create well-organized archives – interoperability LREC Athens 2000 – first workshop on these issues – start of the ISLE project (linguistic concepts, lexicon, metadata, …) – start of the IMDI work in 2000 also first LDC workshop with OLAC as focus little later DOBES was granted and E-Meld started this is very short time when you want to convince a community Access Management Nijmegen November 2004

3. 3 What did we achieve? have “large” on-line digital archives/collections/Digital Libraries – MPI ~40.000 session bundles / ~10 TB – DOBES ~1.500 session bundles/ 1500 h – AILLA – PARADISEC – Lund corpora – also in HLT domain LDC ELRA BAS – also “traditional” archives (Phonogramm Archiv, NAA, …) – etc some of us became “archivists” by practice idea of web visibility and online accessibility spreads despite archiving attempts: according to D. Schüller ~80% of the digitized material is endangered Access Management Nijmegen November 2004

4. 4 What did we achieve? much evangelization and agreement about standards – DOBES workshops and documents – LDC workshops and documents – E-Meld workshops and excellent web-site – ISLE workshops with IMDI result – PARADISEC workshop with DELAMAN result – HRELP workshops – LREC workshops and contributions – ACL workshops and contributions – IASA/IAML conference – etc “everyone” agrees with XML, UNICODE and linear PCM “everyone” understands the relevance of schemas to make linguistic structure and encoding explicit wrt JPEG and MPEG we are shooting on a moving target, but don’t yet have real alternatives Access Management Nijmegen November 2004

5. 5 What did we achieve? created awareness about the need of metadata for visibility created operational metadata infrastructures within 4 years – structured IMDI for discovery and management – OLAC for overall discovery – gateways between the two domains however, still not satisfying situation – > 50 institutions are using IMDI (as far as we know) – ?? institutions are providing OLAC records – still only a small fraction of the language resources are visible – MD creation is hard it is work for others – although this increasingly often is wrong it means cleaning up your own holding and figure out what is available it means to write “correct” scripts and to learn new software it means being disciplined have done our development job – have to continue dissemination despite limitations we hope that people stick to what is out there Access Management Nijmegen November 2004

6. 6 What did we achieve? interoperability is still a dream however … – have metadata gateways in our discipline (OLAC-IMDI) – increasingly often tools are producing correct XML, UNICODE, … – have filters for character encodings and formats although we miss well-designed and comprehensive services – have started with ontological work to tackle the linguistic aspects GOLD ontology from E-Meld ISO TC37/SC4 Data Category Registry TDS (Dutch Typology Project) meta-language EAGLES/ISLE/TEI specifications we are at the beginning cannot speak yet about fully operational infrastructures but there are islands like FIELD, LEXUS, ONTO-ELAN, … Access Management Nijmegen November 2004

7. 7 Changing role of Language Archives different groups of people contribute Access Management Nijmegen November 2004 The Archive different groups of people use the content specialists maintain, unify, check quality, etc at the MPI it is understood that the archive is the capital to build on in the DOBES programme the point to make results explicit and accessible only works if we don’t have an “inert, dusty” archives – not an attractive perspective – hear more about this from D.Schüller

8. 8 Vision for a single archive Access Management Nijmegen November 2004 Metadata Tools Archive Utility Layer Domain of Registered Primary and Secondary Resources Domain of Descriptive Metadata Primary Resources: Texts Images Sound Movies User Data Ingestion& Management User Authentication Access Rights Web-based Archive Exploration Annotation Exploration Lexicon Exploration Text Exploration Ontological Knowledge Media Annotation (Web-based) Archive Enrichment Lexical Encoding Web Commentary The Archive done in progress to start

9. 9 Everything ok – so let’s go home … what about the following scenario? Access Management Nijmegen November 2004 Raw Data Metadata Raw Data Metadata data exchange for data survival reasons archive A archive B

10. 10 Everything ok – so let’s go home … what about the following scenario? Access Management Nijmegen November 2004 Raw Data Metadata DOBES Archive Raw Data Metadata AILLA Archive my personal Trumai archive AILLA Trumai DOBES Trumai not just copies but result of own creative process

11. 11 DELAMAN Digital Endangered Languages and Music Archive Network loose network of “archives” sharing a set of visions such as – want to exchange data automatically (list driven) – want to allow people to create integrated virtual working spaces – want to have an integrated access management domain first talks in Nijmegen and at HRELP workshops 2003 foundation at PARADISEC meeting in Sydney 2003 no deep discussions about wishes in detail and implementation therefore this workshop in Nijmegen it’s about future usage scenarios with distributed archives Access Management Nijmegen November 2004

12. 12 DELAMAN / DAM-LR Map DELAMAN is an international network DAM-LR – Distributed Access Management for Language Resources – 3 year EU project starting at 1.1.05 – yes we have money to start – centered around the DELAMAN intentions Access Management Nijmegen November 2004 MPI AILLA EMELD ANLC LACITO ELAR PARADISEC AMPM LundINL AIATSIS

13. 13 Workshop want to get a deeper understanding of what “we” want need good requirements specifications want to get a deeper understanding what others are doing – our ideas are not new – we share them with others – Digital Library initiatives (FEDORA, …) – GRID initiative(s) (SRB, GTK, …) – compute/function/data GRID therefore we invited – linguists knowing about potential and real user wishes – “archivists” knowing about maintaining large repositories – technologists knowing about current and future developments – some of us looked into the legal and ethical aspects at the end we should be ready to start Access Management Nijmegen November 2004

14. 14 Programme 1. Day Access Management Nijmegen November 2004 29.11. Setting the Framework 9.00W. KleinWelcome 9.10P. WittenburgDELAMAN and Workshop Goals 9.40D. SchüllerAudiovisual archiving: Visions, Challenges, Strategies 10.15Discussion 10.30Coffee Break Researcher Requirements Kamp 11.00T. Aristar/H. DryLinguist Wishes 11.30P. Austin/D. NathanLinguist Wishes 12.00G. Holton/H. JohnsonLegal & Ethical Aspects 12.30Lunch Break Archivist Requirements Strömquist 13.30H. JohnsonAILLA Setup and Implications 14.00L. BarwickParadisec Setup and Implications 14.30Wittenburg/Skiba/TrilsbeekDOBES Setup and Implications 15.00Coffee Break Summary and Discussion Strömquist 15.30Uneson/Broeder/StrömquistSummary of Requirements 16.00 Questions and Discussion 17.00W. KrullDOBES Program and the VW Foundation 17.15Soddemann/Neumair/Verharen/WbgTechnology - Broad View 17.30 18.00End 20.00Joint Dinner at Kwok Paw

15. 15 Programme 2. Day Access Management Nijmegen November 2004 30.11. Technology Components Nathan 9.00T. Soddemann (got the Billing Award)Web Services 9.40D. BarryGRID Components 10.10B. KerverAuthentication and Authorization Systems 11.00Coffee Break Nathan 11.30L. LannomHandle System 12.00R. MooreStorage Resource Broker 12.45Discussion 13.00Lunch Break Mapping Requirements and Technology Aristar/ Broeder 14.00Aristar/Dry/Johnson/Barwick/…Understanding Technology Linguists/Archivists 14.15Broeder/Nathan/Jacobson/Neumair/...Choice and Integration Aspects 14.30Discussion 15.00Coffee Break 15.30Grand Summary and Open Discussion 16.00WittenburgSummary 16.30Discussion 17.00End times not too strict – it’s a workshop

16. 16 Let’s go … Access Management Nijmegen November 2004 The MPI team wishes us two interesting and highly interactive days in Nijmegen Daan, AndreasTechnology Paul, RomanArchive Peter??