Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Sukumar Rajauria Néel Institute, CNRS and Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France With H. Courtois, P. Gandit, T. Fournier, F. Hekking, B. Pannetier.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Sukumar Rajauria Néel Institute, CNRS and Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France With H. Courtois, P. Gandit, T. Fournier, F. Hekking, B. Pannetier."— Presentation transcript:

1 Sukumar Rajauria Néel Institute, CNRS and Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France With H. Courtois, P. Gandit, T. Fournier, F. Hekking, B. Pannetier Inherent Thermometer in a Superconductor – Normal metal – Superconductor cooling junction

2 Outline Introduction Sample and Experiments Extraction of electronic temperature Thermal model Conclusion

3 E 2Δ2Δ I S T = 0 K Empty States Occupied States Forbidden states N Quasiparticle Tunneling in N-I-S junction Principle of N-I-S cooler The superconductor energy gap Induces an energy-selective tunneling.

4 Quasiparticle Tunneling in N-I-S junction E 2Δ2Δ I S T > 0 K N ~4kT Empty States Occupied States Forbidden states Principle of N-I-S cooler The superconductor energy gap Induces an energy-selective tunneling.

5 E 2Δ2Δ I S Empty States Occupied States T > 0 K eV ItIt Forbidden states N Quasiparticle Tunneling in N-I-S junction Principle of N-I-S cooler The superconductor energy gap Induces an energy-selective tunneling.

6 E 2Δ2Δ I S Empty States Occupied States T > 0 K eV Forbidden states N Q Quasiparticle Tunneling in N-I-S junction Principle of N-I-S cooler: Extraction of heat current by tunneling of hot quasiparticle out of the Normal metal in N-I-S junction.

7 F. Giazotto, T. T. Heikkila, A. Luukanen, A. M. Savin and J. P. Pekola, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 217 (2006). S-I-N-I-S = 2 × N-I-S junctions in series P cool increases by a factor of 2 Better thermal isolation of N-island V bias S N S Thermometer Need for a thermometer ! E E 2Δ2Δ I S Empty States Occupied States T > 0 K N eV 2Δ2Δ S ItIt ItIt Q Q The S-I-N-I-S geometry I

8 E. Favre-Nicollin et. al. Thermometer Junctions Cooler junctions 2 µm Cu Al Thermometry with N-I-S junctions Additional N-I-S junctions can be used as a thermometer:

9 This work How much can we lower the electronic temperature ? Can we avoid the use of N-I-S thermometer junctions ? What about the phonons ? Is a quantitative analysis possible ?

10 Probe Junction: N electrode is strongly thermalized, litlle cooling effect expected. I 1 µm Cu Al Cooler junctions: N electrode is weakly coupled to external world, strong cooling effect expected. A cooler with improved aspect ratio

11 Probe follows isothermal prediction at T base. High resolution measurement (log scale) « Cooler behaves differently » Probe T base = 304 mK Cooler Al I 1 µm Cu Cooling in N-I-S junction Probe Cooler

12 Superposition of expt data with isotherm gives the electronic temperature at a particular bias. Temperature Determination Determination of the bias-dependent electron temperature

13 N electrons, T e S, T base N phonons, T ph Substrate phonons, T base Power flow from N electrons to the S electrodes remaining at base temperature Electron - phonon coupling Kapitza thermal coupling The thermal model Steady state:

14 N electrons, T e S, T base N phonons, T ph Substrate phonons, T base Power flow from N electrons to the S electrodes remaining at base temperature Electron - phonon coupling Kapitza thermal coupling The thermal model Steady state: Hyp.: N phonons are strongly thermalized

15 For T ph = T base Impossible to fit data with a given  Need to let phonon temperature T ph vary Hypothesis of phonon thermalized to the bath T Base (mK)  (10 9 ) (Wm -3 K -5 ) 2

16 N electrons, T e S, T base N phonons, T ph Substrate phonons, T base Power flow from N electrons to the S electrodes remaining at base temperature Electron - phonon coupling Kapitza thermal coupling The thermal model Steady state: N phonons can be cooled

17 Two free fit parameters:  = 2 nW.µm -3.K -5 K = 55 W.m -2.K -4 Determination of both electron (T e ) and phonon (T ph ) temperature. Phonons cool down by ~ 50 mK at 500 mK Phonon Cooling

18 Conclusion Direct determination of the electronic temperature in the N-metal Quantitative analysis of cooling Including phonon cooling enables a good fit to the data Thanks to: EU STREP SFINX NanoSciERA “NanoFridge“

19

20 Phonon temperature For d = 50 nm, T > 0.35 K

21 Extrapolation of the model Parameter K governs coupling between the metal phonons and the substrate K = 0: diff. cond. peak at zero bias

22

23


Download ppt "Sukumar Rajauria Néel Institute, CNRS and Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France With H. Courtois, P. Gandit, T. Fournier, F. Hekking, B. Pannetier."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google