Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Nuclear Weapons: The Final Pandemic Preventing Proliferation and Achieving Abolition Changing views of the biological effects of low-level ionizing radiation.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Nuclear Weapons: The Final Pandemic Preventing Proliferation and Achieving Abolition Changing views of the biological effects of low-level ionizing radiation."— Presentation transcript:

1 Nuclear Weapons: The Final Pandemic Preventing Proliferation and Achieving Abolition Changing views of the biological effects of low-level ionizing radiation Steve Wing Associate Professor of Epidemiology University of North Carolina School of Public Health

2 Brenner et al., 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12 Lifetime Cumulative DoseDose at Ages 45+ Oak Ridge National Laboratory External Radiation and Cancer Deaths, 1943-1990 Based on Richardson & Wing, Int J Epidemiol, 28:428-436, 1999

13 Estimated association between cumulative radiation dose (3-yr lag) and mortality due to leukemia. LeukemiaLeukemia-CLLMyeloid Leukemia Males & Females ERR/10 mSv0.0410.0770.123 90% CI-0.001, 0.1160.014, 0.1980.021, 0.354 LRT (  2, 1 d.f.) 2.504.925.14 Males only ERR/10 mSv0.0440.0820.136 90% CI0.000, 0.1230.016, 0.2110.025, 0.395 LRT (  2, 1 d.f.) 2.725.225.54 Richardson & Wing, American Journal of Epidemiology, 2007

14 Time since exposure LeukemiaLeukemia-CLLMyeloid Leukemia 3-<15 years ERR/10 mSv0.2800.3690.437 90% CI0.021, 0.7280.003, 1.046<0, 1.598 LRT (  2, 1 d.f.) 3.342.781.74 15-<30 years ERR/10 mSv0.0120.0090.013 90% CI<0, 0.109<0, 0.167<0, 0.364 LRT (  2, 1 d.f.) 0.070.020.01 30+ years ERR/10 mSv-0.0030.1040.211 90% CI<0, 0.151<0, 0.458<0, 1.192 LRT (  2, 1 d.f.) 0.000.980.86 Association between mortality due to leukemia among male SRS workers and cumulative radiation dose accrued in 3 exposure time windows

15 15 country studyA-bomb survivors (men ages 20-60 ATB) SRS study No. cancers ERR/Sv (90%CI) No. cancers ERR/Sv (90%CI) No. cancers ERR/Sv (90%CI) 1961.93 (<0, 7.14) 833.15* (1.79, 5.18) 627.70 (1.40, 19.80) Excess relative risk per Sv for leukemia excluding CLL for A-bomb survivors, workers included in the IARC 15-country study, and for SRS workers * Derived via a linear ERR model adjusted for age, calendar period, and city

16 Alice Stewart’s model of exposure age and cancer risk Stewart, A. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108:93-96, 2000

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25 Pierce et al. Radiation Research, 167:735-741, 2007

26 Alternative Descriptions of Age-at-Exposure Effects on Solid Cancer Incidence, Life Span Study, 1958-1998 Preston et al., Radiation Research, 168:1-64, 2007 age at exposure

27 Prevalence Odds Ratios for “Multifactorial Disease” in Relation to Parental Radiation Doses: Clinical Health Study of Children of A-bomb Survivors Relative odds per Gy, 95% CI Female offspringMale offspring Mother’s dose0.98 0.83 – 1.16 0.97 0.81 – 1.17 Father’s dose1.04 0.90 – 1.21 0.76 0.65 – 0.89 RERF, Report on the Health Effects Study of the Children of A-bomb Survivors, March, 2007

28 Source: US Department of Energy, Closing the Circle on the Splitting of the Atom, 1996


Download ppt "Nuclear Weapons: The Final Pandemic Preventing Proliferation and Achieving Abolition Changing views of the biological effects of low-level ionizing radiation."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google