Presentation on theme: "Radiation Carcinogenesis Martin Brown. Two types of late effects of irradiation Deterministic (non-stochastic) effects –Severity increases with dose."— Presentation transcript:
Radiation Carcinogenesis Martin Brown
Two types of late effects of irradiation Deterministic (non-stochastic) effects –Severity increases with dose. There is a threshold. Eg tissue fibrosis, cataracts. –Mechanism involves effects (often cell kill) on many cells. Stochastic Effects –No threshold, probability increases with dose but severity is independent of dose (eg cancer and genetic effects)
Both Marie Curie (the discoverer of radium) and her daughter Irene died of leukemia - probably due to their radiation exposures It was known early after the discovery of radiation that it could cause cancer
Mutations produce Cancer H J Muller (1927) found that X-rays induce gene mutations in Drosophila (fruit flies) and that they do so linearly with dose. “The effect of X-rays, in occasionally producing cancer, may also be associated with their action in producing mutations”. Bruce Ames. 1970’s: developed test in bacteria for potency of chemicals to cause mutations - these correlated with potency to cause cancer in rodents. Simple idea: mutagens = carcinogens.
Radiation induced cancers Spectrum of cancers is same as that occurring naturally. Severity of induced cancer is independent of dose. Probability of cancer induction increases with dose with no threshold. This is known as stochastic effect Mechanism is that cancer can arise from a single mutation in a single cell.
Risk Estimates for Radiation Induced Cancers Information principally from… Occupationally Exposed: e.g., radium dial painters, uranium miners, early x-ray users. Medically Exposed: e.g., ankylosing spondylitis, tinea capitis, tuberculosis patients, children irradiated for enlarged thymus Atomic Bomb Exposed: e.g., Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors.
Occupational exposure: Bone cancer developed in the “radium dial painters”
Thyroid cancer development in individuals given X- irradiation for enlarged thymus in childhood
Hiroshima immediately after the bomb
Hiroshima chamber of Commerce- before 1945
The A-bomb dome today
Latent Periods For leukemias: Rise started 2 yrs after bomb and reached peak 7-12 yrs after bomb. Most cases observed by 15 yrs Solid Cancers: Excess risk started about 10 years after bomb, excess still continues 60 years after bomb. Thyroid cancer in children has shorter latent period of ~5 yrs.
Breast cancer in A-bomb survivors Preston et al, Rad Res ,2007
Breast cancer in various irradiated populations Relative vs Absolute Risk A-bomb survivors
Dose response curve (relative risk) for all cancers in A-bomb survivors Preston et al, Rad Res ,2007 Data consistent with linear dose response curve
Compared to the number of people in H & N killed outright (~100,000) the number of cancer deaths attributable to the radiation dose is small Preston et al, Rad Res ,2007
Shape of dose response curve A linear, non threshold model is assumed for risk estimates and for radiation protection Dose Rate Effectiveness Factor (DREF) = Ratio of cancer risk at high compared to low dose or low dose rate.
Best overall estimate of total radiation induced cancer mortality 10% per Sv (high doses/dose rates) US Normal is ~ 16% for all cancers
Does this agree with 10% per Sv?
Cancer Risk after Radiotherapy 1 Increase in Relative Risk after Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
Second Cancers after Radiotherapy for Cervix Cancer (Boice et al, 1985) Boice et al: JNCI: , 1985
Cancer risk is relatively independent of dose for high doses (Hall 2003)
Estimating cancer risk in any organ after radiotherapy Using a combination of the linear, non threshold estimates from the A- bomb survivors and actual cancer risk from Hodgkin’s disease patients treated at high doses (~ 40Gy), Schneider et al (Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 2011, 8:27), constructed dose response data for all organs. Below is the one for all cancers. They considered 3 different models:
Organ doses from Medical Radiation Brenner & Hall, NEJM, 2007
Cancer incidence from CT scans Brenner & Hall, NEJM, 2007 Of the 62 million CT scans, 4 million are on small children. 4 x 10 6 x 0.1% = 4 x 10 3 excess ca deaths per year
Summary Radiation is both a mutagen and a carcinogen Human risk estimates are based on a linear, non threshold assumption for the dose response curve Human risks are based largely on the data from the A-bomb survivors. Rule of thumb: 1 Sv (= 1Gy of X-rays) gives 10% cancer death rate over spontaneous rate. Reduce by factor of 2 for low doses and/or low dose rates. Radiation induces genomic instability by as yet unknown mechanisms