1. Uniform Crime Report (UCR) FBI Compiles data from the nation’s law enforcement agencies on crime for: Numbers of arrests Reports of crimes This is the least desirable of crime indicators, but still too often criminologists rely on it. It is also the most widely used publicly by politicians, media, and police.

2. Uniform Crime Report (UCR) FBI Compiles data from the nation’s law enforcement agencies on crime for: Numbers of arrests Reports of crimes This is the least desirable of crime indicators, but still too often criminologists rely on it. It is also the most widely used publicly by politicians, media, and police. UCR reports more variation in crime over time than the other 2 indicators. This variation leads many to believe that crime increases more than it actually did in some years. Over the last ten years, this measure indicates that crime is falling.

3. Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Strengths: Reports Homicides Can easily be disaggregated by demographic characteristics Weaknesses:

4. Strengths: Reports Homicides Can easily be disaggregated by demographic characteristics Shows long term, overall trends in crime Shows official (police) activity Weaknesses: Uniform Crime Report (UCR)

5. Strengths: Reports Homicides Can easily be disaggregated by demographic characteristics Shows long term, overall trends in crime Shows official (police) activity Weaknesses: Not all police units participate Police can “cook” the numbers Underreports all crime: Non-reporting Non-charging

6. Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Strengths: Reports Homicides Can easily be disaggregated by demographic characteristics Shows long term, overall trends in crime Shows official (police) activity Weaknesses: Not all police units participate Police can “cook” the numbers Underreports all crime: Non-reporting Non-charging Arrest numbers are not accurate at the individual level: Cannot know the number of people committing crime Some are never caught Some are arrested on multiple occasions or commit multiple crimes

7. Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Strengths: Reports Homicides Can easily be disaggregated by demographic characteristics Shows long term, overall trends in crime Shows official (police) activity Weaknesses (continued): Social emphases on particular crimes can look like increases or declines (trends can be falsely manufactured or masked) Increases or declines in police activity (e.g., number of officers, funding) can influence numbers

8. National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Annual victimization survey conducted by the US Census Bureau for the Bureau of Justice Statistics Conducted since 1973 Nationally representative sample of roughly 50,000 US households

9. National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Annual victimization survey conducted by the US Census Bureau for the Bureau of Justice Statistics Conducted since 1973 Nationally representative sample of persons 12 and over in roughly 50,000 US households Survey items include victimization questions about: RapeVehicle theft Sexual assaultBattery Robbery Burglary

10. National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Survey items include victimization questions about: RapeVehicle theft Sexual assaultBattery Robbery Burglary NCVS is the best of the crime indicators, giving the most true image of US crime NCVS typically depicts rates of crime as stable. Lack of movement makes it un-sensational and not popular. Used to show that crime has not been going up. Over the last ten years, this measure indicates that crime has been falling.

11. National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Strengths: More accurate portrayal of criminal activity than official data Not influenced by official activity Shows crime trends since 1973 Weaknesses:

12. National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Strengths: More accurate portrayal of criminal activity than official data Not influenced by official activity Shows crime trends since 1973 Weaknesses: Does not provide “arrest” information (official activity) Cannot tell us about individual criminals Cannot know the number of people committing crimes Many crimes are by repeat offenders Relies on memory and judgment (demographic characteristics of offender may be inaccurate)

13. Self-Report Studies Social scientists give questionnaires to subjects asking them to reveal their own participation in delinquent behavior. Often conducted in schools ISR’s Monitoring the Future is one of the most frequently cited (especially for drug use among kids) These studies demonstrate that delinquency is much more common than official data suggest (almost universal) They also indicate that levels of delinquency over time remain fairly stable

14. Self-Report Studies Strengths: Gives individual-level data about the attitudes, behaviors, and extent of involvement of individual delinquents Allows exploration of the processes involved in creating delinquency Some allow estimates of rates of participation in delinquency Weaknesses:

15. Self-Report Studies Strengths: Gives individual-level data about the attitudes, behaviors, and extent of involvement of individual delinquents Allows exploration of the processes involved in creating delinquency Some allow estimates of rates of participation in delinquency Provides data on private or non- identified delinquency Comparative research shows correspondence between self- report studies and other studies Weaknesses:

16. Self-Report Studies Strengths: Gives individual-level data about the attitudes, behaviors, and extent of involvement of individual delinquents Allows exploration of the processes involved in creating delinquency Some allow estimates of rates of participation in delinquency Provides data on private or non- identified delinquency Comparative research shows correspondence between self- report studies and other studies Weaknesses: You gotta wonder whether people will be honest on surveys about illegal behaviors Exaggerated reporting Recall about specific behaviors is difficult Often, surveys are not representative (e.g., they may exclude most hardened delinquents who have dropped out) Drug use may be most underreported behavior

17. Crime in the US At what time of day are kids most likely to commit a crime? Are curfew laws intelligent?

18. Crime in the US

24. 25% of the US Population is 0 – 17 years old

25. Crime in the US

32. Crime in the US Violent Crime Arrests among Juveniles

33. Crime in the US

35. Crime in the US Property Crime Arrests among Juveniles

37. Crime in the US Arrests for Drug Abuse among Juveniles

39. Crime in the US

40. Crime in the US Arrests for Drunkenness among Juveniles

42. Crime in the US Arrests for Running Away among Juveniles

44. Crime in the US

45. Lifetime likelihood of going to State or Federal prison In 2001, an estimated 2.7% of adults in the U.S. had served time in prison, up from 1.8% in 1991 and 1.3% in 1974. If recent incarceration rates remain unchanged, an estimated 1 of every 15 persons (6.6%) will serve time in a prison during their lifetime. Lifetime chances of a person going to prison are higher for –-- men (11.3%) than for women (1.8%) –-- blacks (18.6%) and Hispanics (10%) than for whites (3.4%) Based on current rates of first incarceration, an estimated 32% of black males will enter State or Federal prison during their lifetime, compared to 17% of Hispanic males and 5.9% of white males. Source: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm#lifetime

46. Crime in the US Recidivism—not what you think! Of the 272,111 persons released from prisons in 15 States in 1994, an estimated 67.5% were rearrested for a felony or serious misdemeanor within 3 years, 46.9% were reconvicted, and 25.4% resentenced to prison for a new crime. The 272,111 offenders discharged in 1994 accounted for nearly 4,877,000 arrest charges over their recorded careers. Within 3 years of release, 2.5% of released rapists were rearrested for another rape, and 1.2% of those who had served time for homicide were arrested for a new homicide. Source: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm#lifetime

47. Crime in the US Recidivism—not what you think! Within 3 years of release, 2.5% of released rapists were rearrested for another rape, and 1.2% of those who had served time for homicide were arrested for a new homicide. Sex offenders were less likely than non-sex offenders to be rearrested for any offense –– 43 percent of sex offenders versus 68 percent of non-sex offenders. Sex offenders were about four times more likely than non-sex offenders to be arrested for another sex crime after their discharge from prison –– 5.3 percent of sex offenders versus 1.3 percent of non-sex offenders. Approximately 4,300 child molesters were released from prisons in 15 States in 1994. An estimated 3.3% of these 4,300 were rearrested for another sex crime against a child within 3 years of release from prison. Source: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm#lifetime

48. Crime in the US

50. Drug Use and Crime

51. Crime in the US