Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Non-magnetic Planets Yingjuan Ma, Andrew Nagy, Gabor Toth, Igor Sololov, KC Hansen, Darren DeZeeuw, Dalal Najib, Chuanfei Dong, Steve Bougher SWMF User.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Non-magnetic Planets Yingjuan Ma, Andrew Nagy, Gabor Toth, Igor Sololov, KC Hansen, Darren DeZeeuw, Dalal Najib, Chuanfei Dong, Steve Bougher SWMF User."— Presentation transcript:

1 Non-magnetic Planets Yingjuan Ma, Andrew Nagy, Gabor Toth, Igor Sololov, KC Hansen, Darren DeZeeuw, Dalal Najib, Chuanfei Dong, Steve Bougher SWMF User Meeting Oct. 14, 2014

2 Introduction Both Venus and Mars do not have global internal magnetic field but with substantial atmosphere. As a result, solar wind plasma flow interact more directly with the atmosphere/ionosphere system as compared with Earth. The upstream plasma flow interact not only through electric-magnetic forces with the ionosphere, but also through collisions with neutral atmosphere. 2

3 Interaction with Ionosphere

4 Ionosphere of Venus and Mars
From Chen et al., 1978 From Nagy et al., 1980

5 Interaction with Atmosphere -Collisions are important
Elastic collisions: momentum and energy loss of the plasma Inelastic collisions Photoionization: A + h  A+ + e Increase the plasma number density Decrease the average flow speed and temperature Charge exchange: A + B+  A+ + B Usually increase the plasma mass density Decease the total momentum and energy of the plasma Recombination: A+ + e  A Decease the number density, momentum and energy of the plasma

6 Multi-Species Single-fluid MHD Equations
Continuity Equations: Momentum Equation: ( ) Density change caused by chemical reactions Momentum loss due to ion-neutral elastic collisions Momentum loss due to chemical reactions 6

7 Multi-Species Single-fluid MHD Equations (2)
Magnetic Induction Equation: Energy Equation ( ) Energy change due to ion-neutral elastic collisions Energy change due to chemical reactions 7

8 Numerical Method (BATSRUS)
2nd order finite-volume approach Flux functions based on approximate Riemann solver from Linde et al. [2002] 2-stage explicit update scheme with point-implicit scheme for source terms to ensure stabilities.

9 Simulation Details Four ion species: H+, O2+, O+, CO2+; two background neutrals: CO2, O; and eight chemical reactions. Spherical grids: Computational domain: –24RV ≤ X ≤ 8 RV, –16RV ≤ Y, Z ≤ 16 RV ; Radial resolution varies from 5 km in the ionosphere to 3000 km further away; Angular resolution is 2.50 ; 5 million cells, ~5,000 CPU hours. Inner Boundary Conditions Inner boundary at 100 km; [O2+] , [O+] and [CO2+] are in photochemical equilibrium (SZA and optical depth considered); Absorbing boundary condition for U and B. Illustration of the grid system used in the calculation 9

10 Examples Simulation Results of Venus Ma et al., 2013

11 1D subsolar plots of densities, magnetic field and velocity.

12 B Cleaning |B| in the XY plane with hyperbolic B cleaning 12

13 1D subsolar plots of densities, magnetic field and velocity for cases (without and with hyperbolic B cleaning.

14 Simulation Results of Mars (Ma et al., 2014)
B=B0, where B0 is the crustal magnetic field (60-order spherical harmonic model of Arkani-Hamed [2001]) 14 14 14

15 Effects Diurnal Rotation of the Crustal Field
B and Field lines Crustal Field (B0) As the planet rotates, the size and shape of the obstacle to the solar wind varies, as a results, the induced magnetic field also varies with time.

16 Comparison with MGS observations on May 16, 2005
*Overall good agreement between model results and MGS observations. *The agreement is the best for B magnitude (corr. Coeff =0.88, RMSE = 10.9 nT). *The corr. Coeff for components of magnetic field is not as good mostly due to IMF direction change during the day. IMF condition used in the MHD model BX =1.6 nT, BY=-2.5 nT 16 16 16

17 Zoom in view of the comparison with MGS observations on May 16, 2005, over-plotted with local time.
*Good agreement near strong crustal field region indicates that the crustal field model included in the MHD model is quite accurate. *Around dayside weak crustal field region, the induced field is needed to fit with the data. *In some region, it is hard to distinguish what is the cause for the discrepancy (IMF, crustal source, or model limitation). 17 17 17

18 Multi-Fluid MHD Model (Najib et al., 2011)
Continuity equation Momentum equation Pressure equation Magnetic Induction equation where the charge-averaged ion-velocity, and ue are defined as: Causes flow separation in convection electric field direction 18 18 18 18

19 Venus vs Mars (Multi-fluid model)
The multi-fluid effect is much stronger at Mars than at Venus. Proton gyroradius 0.07RV at Venus, 0.4 RM at Mars. The crustal field is not included for Mars for comparison. E Mars E

20 Summary BATSRUS is the best existing tool in simulating plasma interaction with non-magnetic planets. Future work Improve efficiency for multi-fluid MHD code; Couple between SPICE and BATSRUS; Couple between BATSRUS with MGITM; Extend the simulation domain inside the planet to take into account effects of subsurface conducting layer. 20 20 20

21 Thank You 21 21 21


Download ppt "Non-magnetic Planets Yingjuan Ma, Andrew Nagy, Gabor Toth, Igor Sololov, KC Hansen, Darren DeZeeuw, Dalal Najib, Chuanfei Dong, Steve Bougher SWMF User."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google