1. Helping Behavior

2. I. Helping Behavior Defined
A. Prosocial (helping) Behavior: any voluntary behavior
intended to help others.
Altruism: behavior intended to help others out of inner
concern for the welfare of others and without conscious
regard for one’s self-interests.
2) Egoism: consciously planned behavior that involves
helping others as a means to benefit oneself.

3. II. Why and When Do We Help?... The Individual Perspective
Social Exchange Theory: the theory that human
interactions are transactions that aim to maximize one’s
rewards and minimize one’s costs.
B. External Rewards
C. Internal Rewards

4. 1) Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis: the idea that when we
feel empathy for a person (the ability to put oneself in the
shoes of another person and to experience events and
emotions the way that person experiences them), we will
attempt to help that person purely for altruistic reasons,
regardless of what we have to gain.
2) Negative-State Relief Hypothesis: the idea that instead
of helping because we genuinely care about the welfare of
another person, we help because such actions allow us to
reduce our own distressful, unpleasant emotions.
3) Empathic-Joy Hypothesis: the idea that helpers respond
to the needs of a victim because they want to accomplish
something and doing so is rewarding in and of itself.

5. 4) Feel Bad  Do Good  Feel Good… Reducing Guilt
5) Feel Good  Do Good… Sustaining a Positive Mood

6. D. Social Norms
The Norm of Reciprocity: the expectation that people will help, not hurt, those who have helped them.
2) The Social-Responsibility Norm: the expectation that people will help those in need of help.
E. Evolutionary Theory (Kin Selection): the idea that evolution
has selected altruism toward one’s close relatives to enhance
the survival of mutually shared genes.

7. III. Why and When Do We Help?... The Situational Perspective
A. The Murder of Kitty Genovese
B. The Bystander Effect: people are less likely to offer help in
an emergency situation when other people are present; the
greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that any
one of them will help.
C. Using Gestalt Psychology to explain the Bystander
Effect in emergency situations.
1) Gestalt Psychology: focuses on the human ability to perceive overall patterns.
2) Figure and Ground: what’s the object of focus and what’s the background.

8. 3) In large crowds, a person’s attention is focused mostly
on the victim, who is figural, and less so on themselves.
Therefore, they see themselves as part of the background,
which reduces the likelihood that they will offer assistance.
4) In instances when a person is the only bystander, they
are equally figural relative to the person in trouble which
draws their attention to the fact that they are the only
person capable of offering assistance.
5) Objective Self-Awareness Theory: argues that when a
bystander’s attention is focused on themselves, standards of
appropriate behavior (the social norms of helping) get
activated. This increases the likelihood that the bystander will
offer help as attention shifts back and forth between
themselves (helper) and the victim.

9. D. Latené and Darley’s Five Step Model Leading to Helping
1) Noticing the Event
2) Interpreting the Event
Pluralistic Ignorance: people will sometimes assume that
with ambiguous information or in the absence of information
that others have a different and better-informed opinion.

10. 3) Assuming Responsibility
Diffusion of Responsibility: we tend to feel less
responsibility to act when other people nearby are equally
able to act.

11. 4) Knowing How to Offer Help
5) Deciding to Help

12. E. Monkey See, Monkey Do… Again 
1) Once we see some people helping, other people begin
helping. In fact, too many people may try to offer help
and cause “helping interference”.
2) Key Explanations…
The Event Gets Noticed
Objective Self-Awareness Increases
Reduction of Pluralistic Ignorance
By observing other helpers, you now know how to help.
Fear and embarrassment of acting is reduced.
Conformity

13. F. The Perceived Responsibility Models of Helping
1) The Moral Model: people are held responsible both for
problems and solutions and are believed to need proper
motivation.
2) The Compensatory Model: people are not seen as
responsible for problems but they are responsible for solutions.
3) The Medical Model: people are seen as neither responsible
for the problem nor for the solution.
4) The Enlightenment Model: people are seen as responsible
for problems but as unable or unwilling to provide solutions.

14. G. Time Pressures

15. H. Good Samaritan Laws
I. Environmental Factors
1) People are more helpful when it’s pleasantly warm
and sunny.
2) People are more likely to help strangers in small
towns & cities than in big cities.
3) What matters is the current environmental setting, not
where a person was raised.
4) Urban Overload Hypothesis: the theory that people living
in cities are constantly being bombarded with stimulation and
that they keep to themselves to avoid being overwhelmed by it.

16. J. Similarity
We are likely to help people we perceive as similar to
us in some way.

17. K. Attractiveness
Physically attractive and well-dressed people are more
likely to receive help than physically unattractive and
poorly-dressed people.
2) This is especially strong when it comes to attractive
women receiving help from men.

18. IV. Who Will Help? A. The Altruistic Personality
1) High Levels of Empathy
2) Belief in a Just World
3) Accepting of Social Responsibility
4) An Internal Locus of Control
5) Low Egocentrism

19. B. Gender
1) Men are more likely to engage in helping that is heroic
and chivalrous.
2) Men are more likely to help strangers than are women.
3) Women are more likely to engage in helping that is
nurturing.

20. C. Religiosity
1) Religious people are more likely to help in numerous
ways than are non-religious people.
2) Religion operates similarly to social norms. The norms
of many religions include the element of helping those in
need.

21. V. Who Wants Help? A. Equity
People may prefer relationships which are equitable,
in which giving and receiving are in balance. One-way
helping threatens equity and creates power imbalances.
B. Self-Esteem
When aid lowers recipients’ self-esteem, they are
more likely to dislike both the aid and the helper, and
are likely to avoid seeking such help again.
2) When the helper is very similar to oneself, receiving
aid is likely to reduce one’s self-esteem.
3) How recipients respond to help is also influenced by
their present level of self-esteem.

22. VI. How Can Helping Behavior be Increased?
A. Personalized Verbal Appeals
1) “Even a penny will help.”
B. Personalized Nonverbal Appeals
C. Learning to be Helpful
D. Learning about Helping Behavior
E. Devictimize Yourself!