Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Matthew Psycharis, Raoul Renard, Nicholas Kotzman (absent)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Matthew Psycharis, Raoul Renard, Nicholas Kotzman (absent)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Matthew Psycharis, Raoul Renard, Nicholas Kotzman (absent)
Mooting Workshop Matthew Psycharis, Raoul Renard, Nicholas Kotzman (absent)

2 Disclaimer: These are just our ideas
Disclaimer: These are just our ideas. There are a number of different ways to prepare and present a moot.

3 Pre-problem planning Set up a filesharing service (we used Dropbox)

4 Pre-problem planning Set yourself deadlines
Be sensitive to availability of team members, schedules etc. Book a room or find a place to meet (early)

5 When you get the problem
What area of law? (E.g. contract, tort, s 18 of ACL, family etc.) What jurisdiction? E.g. first instance, appellate What are the questions of law at play? As distinct from questions of fact (in appellate cases, no questions of fact) Splitting between senior and junior counsel What does your client want?

6 Developing arguments RESEARCH, RESEARCH, RESEARCH
Start with authoritative textbooks in the area E.g. Meagher, Gummow and Lehane (Trusts); Cheshire and Fifoot (Contracts) Other secondary literature Academic journals etc. Try Google (Firms often write blog posts etc) Halsbury’s is a good starting point also Look at relevant cases cited in the area Once you’ve got an idea of where the case law is, jump on Westlaw and/or LexisNexisAU to find cases and factual analogies

7 Writing written submissions
Concise Not abstract statement of law. Grounded in facts For example: The Defendant publican does not owe a duty of care to the Plaintiff patron as the Plaintiff’s injury was not reasonably foreseeable, and the publican did not have control of the Plaintiff’s surroundings. NOT Publicans do not ordinarily owe a duty of care to patrons once they have left the premises.

8 Writing written submissions

9 Clear argumentation Focus on clear arguments, and your strongest arguments. Most complex argument may be difficult to express in 10 minutes, and may ‘lose’ the judge Milk the facts – do not retell the facts Facts are agreed, never disputing them.

10 Preparing and delivering oral submissions
Clear, short introduction Clear signposting Pace and tone Maintain eye contact with judge (all judges if make it to final) Be respectful toward judge and other side No arrogant, debating style

11 Formalities Stand and bow when judge enters ‘May it please the Court’
‘Your Honour’ ‘My learned junior counsel’ ‘Our learned friends’ (other side) ‘Her Honour Justice Warren noted in …’ ‘May I dispense with formal citations’ (after first formal citation)

12 Questions from the bench
Take a moment if you need Let the judge finish question completely If the judge looks like they are about to ask a question, anticipate by pausing The best advocates appear as if they are in conversation with the judge Not all questions from judges are attacks Be prepared to depart from speech Be prepared to give your best answer, but if cannot go any further, admit it: ‘I cannot take this point any higher, your Honour’

13 Questions?


Download ppt "Matthew Psycharis, Raoul Renard, Nicholas Kotzman (absent)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google