Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Steven L. Frick, MD Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Steven L. Frick, MD Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC"— Presentation transcript:

1 Steven L. Frick, MD Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC
Pediatric Hip Steven L. Frick, MD Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC

2 Pediatric Hip Problems
Common, age related differences in presentation Traction rarely used now as treatment If used, often in-line skin traction (Buck’s) for comfort temporarily Remember to limit weight, watch skin DDH, LCP, SCFE, trauma

3 Normal DDH

4 Developmental Hip Dysplasia DDH- definition
Developmental instead of congenital- more reflective of etiology Any hip which can be provoked to subluxate (partial contact between femoral head and acetabulum) or dislocate (no contact between femoral head and acetabulum), or any subluxated or dislocated hip that can be reduced

5 DDH Incidence Depends on criteria 2-9/1000 births 70% female
Left > Right, 20% bilateral some populations at higher risk

6 Risk Factors 1st born Female Breech + family history
Torticollis, MTA – some debate Some populations- swaddling

7

8 Barlow positive

9 Ortolani positive

10 Treatment Goals Obtain and maintain reduction to provide optimal environment for hip development Potential for remodeling/development present for many years Intervene to alter otherwise unfavorable natural history AVOID ischemic necrosis

11 Treatment: Newborn - 6 mo.
CR => Pavlik harness Arnold Pavlik, MD 1945 “functional” treatment 531/632 dislocated hips reduced with no AVN

12 Mubarak et al. – JBJS 1981- Pitfalls
Pavlik Harness Mubarak et al. – JBJS Pitfalls

13 Success-Pavlik Harness
Dislocated- 85% Dislocatable % Residual Dysplasia- may have acetabular dysplasia in up to 15% after successful reduction/stabilization

14 “Failed Pavlik” Hip Arthrogram closed vs. open reduction
spica cast 6-12 weeks Can try rigid abduction bracing- about 50% of Pavlik failures will dock and stabilize

15 Plastizote abduction brace for failed Pavlik harness reduction
>50% success at reduction Boston Children’s series 13/15 success

16 Ultrasound Static angles (Graf)‏
% fem head coverage (Morin – 58% normal)‏ Dynamic stability (Harcke)‏

17 Ultrasound - Dynamic Harcke
Evaluate stability, real time, no radiation, document success/failure of reduction, easy to perform in harness

18 Ultrasound Disadvantages Only < 9mos (ossific nucleus)‏ Expense
Technique/expertise dependent not good at quantifying dysplasia May lead to overtreatment (stable hips dysplastic by US become normal)

19 Pavlik Success

20 Newborn male B dislocated hips
Pavlik for 4 weeks Ultrasound to document reduction

21

22

23

24 Closed Reduction – age 6 to 18 mos

25

26

27

28 Keep Hip in Socket while... Avoiding AVN is goal

29 Ogden’s anatomic dissections

30 Ogden’s anatomic dissections

31 To assess closed reduction after spica cast :
Check CT scan or MRI scan

32 Repeat arthrogram 6 weeks after closed reduction- normal

33 Open Reduction For failure to achieve acceptable closed reduction, late presentation (>18 mos) Anterior (capsulorrhaphy) or anteromedial (remove obstacles, no capsulorrhaphy)‏ Higher % ON (mild) with anteromedial approach

34 Radiographs in DDH

35 X-Rays

36 Follow until skeletal maturity
Make sure acetabulum develops properly Goal = normal motion and normal radiograph at maturity radiographic assessment 6-12 mo intervals, then 2-3 year intervals acetabular index, lateralization ratio, teardrop, subluxation, femoral head ossification

37 42 months 21 months 38 years 24 years Courtesy of S. Weinstein, MD Univ. of Iowa

38 Persistent Acetabular Dysplasia
Scoles – normal values for AI- 20 deg by 2 yrs Lindseth/Ponseti/Wenger – acetabular development may proceed up to age 8 after CR Lalonde/Frick/Wenger – residual hip dysplasia treated < age 8 more normal radiographic anatomy AI>35 2 yrs post CR- 80% Severin III or IV

39 Subluxation Those with subluxation more symptomatic
Usually symptomatic by mid 30’s for women

40 Salter Pelvic Osteo-tomy
Redirects acetabulum to give more coverage to femoral head

41 Peri-acetabular osteotommies Dega, Pemberton, Tonnis, Albee

42

43

44 Exam - Older Infant > 3 Months
Limited abduction Asymmetric thigh folds Galeazzi or Allis sign- short femoral segment with hip and knee flexed

45 Limited Abduction Galeazzi sign

46 4 yr old missed bilat DDH Waddling gait Lumbar lordosis Trendelenberg

47

48 DDH Older child Treatment principles the same
reduce hip without excessive pressure operative treatment shorten femur – traction out of favor femoral and pelvic osteotomies older, bilateral - ? No treatment Unilateral – up to age 10, bilateral age 6

49 4 yo late dx DDH

50 No femoral shortening - AVN

51 Remember to examine intoer’s hips

52

53 Natural History - Dislocated Hip
High riding, no pseudo- acetabulum do better Back pain, valgus knee

54 Untreated Hip Dislocation
90 years old 4 years old

55 What is this? Stage?

56 Same patient later – what happened
Same patient later – what happened? List the head-at-risk factors you see. What stage now?

57 At Risk Signs Catterall
Calcification lateral to physis Lateral subluxation Gage’s sign Diffuse metaphyseal reaction Horizontal physis Gage’s sign- V notch lateral physis

58 What is this patient’s story?

59 What is this?

60 What is this?

61 Which is better for LCP?

62 Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease
Idiopathic osteonecrosis of the proximal femoral epiphysis

63 Etiology Mechanical obstruction of extraosseous vessels
Intraosseous venous obstruction Capsular swelling Generalized disorder of epiphyseal cartilage Thrombophilia- factor V Leiden mutation, anticardiolipin antibodies

64 Early XR Findings Smaller femoral head Widened cartilage space
Subchondral fx line (Caffey’s sx)‏ Increased density Fragmentation

65 Who gets Perthes? Smaller, very active boys ADHD - Loder, 1993
Delayed skeletal age

66 Females with Perthes ? Less favorable outcome – now no if control for age of onset Female – age onset 9 yrs

67 Classification Salter - Thomson
Gp A - Subchondral fracture involves < 1/2 femoral head Gp B - Subchondral fracture involves > 1/2 femoral head

68

69 Stulberg Classification
II III I – Normal head II – Round head but big/short III – Ovoid head and acetabulum IV – Flattened head and acetabulum V – Head collapsed without acetabular remodeling IV V

70 Prognostic Factors Age at onset Extent of femoral head involvement
subluxation Loss of motion

71 Treatment Needs to be in initial or fragmentation phase to alter shape of head Goal = congruity, containment

72 Containment Treatments
Non-operative Petrie casts, Orthoses, ROM exercises Operative Femoral Osteotomy Innominate Osteotomy Combined Osteotomy Shelf Osteotomy

73 Orthoses Birmingham Tachdjian Brace Toronto Brace Brace Note Chain And
Padlocks Newington Brace Atlanta-Scottish Brace

74 Abduction Bracing Meehan JBJS No advantage to other methods or no treatment Martinez JBJS Not recommended May make a comeback (don’t just stand there, do something!)‏

75 Femoral Osteotomy Few stiff hips Abductor lurch Unsightly scar
Hardware removal Future surgery - valgus

76

77

78 Pelvic Osteotomies Recalcitrant stiffness
? Increase pressure on femoral head with Salter innominate osteotomy

79 Femoral vs. Innominate Osteotomy Sponseller 1988
49 pelvic 9 yr f/u No significant difference

80 Hinge Abduction Failure of movement of lateral corner of epiphysis under edge of acetabulum on radiograph taken with hip abducted and internally rotated - Reinker, JPO 1996

81 Hinge Abduction Arthrogram Abduction traction Petrie cast
Surgical containment - Reinker, JPO 1996

82 Chiari Chiari pelvic osteotomy Deformed head
Displace acetab superomedially Cover femoral head, enlarge acetabular capacity, relieve pain Head covered laterally by ilium, capsulefibrous metaplasia

83 Shelf Shelf Acetabuloplasty (Gill, then Staheli)
Lateral subluxation & uncoverage, hinged abduction Increases acetabular volume Pry down ilium and create notch to augment with bone graft above capsule Fibrous metaplasia Some advocate in pts > 5 y.o as a primary option (Jacobs, 2004)‏

84 Perthes Horizon Bisphosphonates Return of bracing Earlier surgery?
Hinged distraction of severe, late cases

85 13 yo male c/o knee pain Knee pain for one month overweight
worse with activity no night pain

86

87

88 Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis
Heavy adolescents, groin or hip pain 16% present with “knee pain” PE : limited IR of hip XR : frog lateral most sensitive Tx = screw fixation Goal = prevent further deformity, AVN

89 Classification Stable – can weight bear. At risk for deformity progression (convert to unstable) and arthrosis secondary to anatomic abnormality Unstable- cannot weight bear. At risk for ON- 3 to 47%

90 In situ screw fixation Use C-arm- mark lines on skin

91 Perc placement of guidewire
Start more anterior on neck for more severe slips- screw head may impinge

92 Pin center - center Rotate C-arm around – Get this perpendicular view

93 Screw fixation AP / Lat Try to get 5 screw threads into epiphysis

94 Perpendicular view- true length
Use approach-withdrawal technique to check length

95 Skin incision

96 Don’t start too low

97 Where did I put this screw? Rare “valgus slip”

98 Postop CT can help – rarely needed

99 When to pin?

100 Knee Pain

101 12 days later- admit?? or Crutches and operate later??

102 Ten days later In ED - Unstable

103

104 If deformity is really bad – should we do something different?
Impingement – by neck or our screw? Natural history reasonable- most say pin first and follow

105 Unstable SCFE – urgent traction “reduction”, screw fixation, arthrotomy decompression

106 1 month postop

107 11 months postop

108 Unstable slips Timing controversial – early may be better
Arthrotomy recommended- some studies show lower ON rate Reduction ok-incidental or gentle to “stable” position – not forceful closed reduction

109 13 yo male, slip and fall. No antecedent pain. Can’t move.

110 Urgent ORIF with neck osteotomy via surgical dislocation

111 1 or 2 screws for unstable slip?- controversial

112 Displaced femoral neck fracture

113

114 MECHANISM MVC, car vs. ped, high falls
Minor trauma can still be a cause

115 CLASSIFICATION Delbet 1928

116 10 yo female- Injury – type I fracture dislocation of hip

117 ORIF and pins attempted

118 CT prior to return to OR

119 Repeat ORIF

120 11 mos- osteonecrosis

121 Type II

122 TYPE III

123 S.E.--OR

124 TYPE IV

125 R.K.R.--14 yo male

126 R.K.R.--ORIF, tape

127 R.K.R.--15 months

128 TYPE IV--13 yo

129 TYPE IV--DHS, wire

130 TYPE IV--2 mo post-op

131


Download ppt "Steven L. Frick, MD Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google