Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

 Web 2.0: Music Services April 27, 2012. Agenda  Cloud services  Online streaming services  Questions and app sharing by demand.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: " Web 2.0: Music Services April 27, 2012. Agenda  Cloud services  Online streaming services  Questions and app sharing by demand."— Presentation transcript:

1  Web 2.0: Music Services April 27, 2012

2 Agenda  Cloud services  Online streaming services  Questions and app sharing by demand

3 Why learn music services?  Patrons may ask about these services  Understanding how copyright law fits into free online distribution  You may like them!

4 Cloud Services Google Play Amazon Cloud Player iCloud and iMatch

5  Online Radio

6 Digital Millennium Copyright Act  Passed in 1998 by President Bill Clinton  Used to criminalize the distribution and access to copyrighted material  Provides a fairly strong no liability clause for internet providers

7 Pandora Online radio: based on genre, artist, or song Formatted for user based on likes and dislikes Tied strongly with the Music Genome Project Create up to 100 stations

8 Pandora Pros  Fairly hassle free, plays continuous stream  App for iPhone, Android, and Blackberry  Over 700,000 songs  Provides artist info, lyrics, and similar artists Cons  Not a play-on-demand  Ads and disrupted play  No repeat or replay option

9 Legality and Distribution  Not available to any IP address outside of the United States  Cannot be used in commercial locations  Only to be played through site or supported platform  No glaring copyright lawsuits

10 Last.fm Scrobbling Customized radio stations Continuous streaming radio Available across many countries

11 Last.fm Pros  Like Pandora, fairly hassle free  Provides slideshow accompanying the stream  Pulls from pretty much anything  12 million songs  App for iPhone and Android Cons  Confusing to integrate radio stations (music I don’t own) with my own library (music I do own)  Non effective play-by-demand, no repeat

12 Legality and Distribution  English based. They follow their rules.  No downloading or reproducing  Pay for the music they stream, fund through adds and donations

13 8tracks Create and share playlists (complete with title and artwork) Search by tag (era, mood, genre, etc.) Can favorite and comment on user playlists All playlists must be at least 8tracks

14 8tracks Pros  Strong community aspect  Lot of great search possibilities with tags  Organization of your own playlists  App for iPhone and Android Cons  Unless they are your playlists, not play by demand  Restrictive skipping  Cannot see all tracks in a playlist

15 Legality and Distribution  They pay royalties to copyright owners  Limit the tracks per artist and per album  License with ASCAP, BMI, SESAC  Private use only

16 We Are Hunted 100 Song playlists Music aggregate site, monitor social media and other music platforms Trend based site

17 We Are Hunted Pros  Find the popular music of the moment  Provides a graphic interactive interface  You can pick and choose which tracks you want to add to personal playlist  App for iPhone and Android Cons  Very limited music selection  Replication and finding previously found music is difficult

18 Legality and Distribution  We Are Hunted covers itself by providing clear links to where it found its music and the artist and label attached to it  Pulls from all the other music sites and their legal terms of use, claims no liability for their content

19 thesixtyone Presents music uploaded by artists Much like We Are Hunted, tracks popularity Creates playlist by popularity, mood, and personal preference

20 thesixtyone Pros  Incredibly unique interface  Interactive, and at times competitive social atmosphere  Artist uploaded, so there is content here you may not find elsewhere Cons  Relies greatly on continued use  Not an information heavy interface  Difficult to replicate playlists or searches  No mobile app

21 Legality and Distribution  The music is uploaded typically by the artist  Personal use only, not for commercial streaming

22 Spotify Heavily tied with Facebook Free download from internet but is a desktop application Allows searching and free play from select labels

23 Spotify Pros  Its heavily tied with Facebook (and Twitter)  15 million songs  Play-by-demand Cons  Its heavily tied to Facebook (and Twitter)  Is restrictive if using only as free service  Limit to 10 hours per month

24 Legality and Distribution  Has been criticized for not paying independent artists fairly  Again pays royalties for all the music they share  Slowly becoming more of a pay service, so this is becoming less of an issue

25 Grooveshark A little bit of everything, Can upload on music to site Create playlists, search and listen to others playlists Find what is popular with friends or entire grooveshark community or use radio stream

26 Grooveshark Pros  Play by demand  Has over 22 million songs, by far the most extensive library  Has the ability to share to most social media sites Cons  Very ad heavy if not using V.I.P.  Searches sometimes get bogged through excessive matches  Down for maintenance frequently  Mobile apps are not reliable

27 Legality and Distribution  The legal but not licensed problem  Gets music from labels, independent artists, and users. The users portion is where it gets shifty.  Currently being sued by EMI Music Publishing, Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Music Group and Universal Music.

28 Some of the others…  MOG  Rhapsody  Slacker  Finetune  Fizy  Aupeo  Rdio  Musicuo  Jamendo  Bandcamp  Blip.fm  City Sounds  Shoutcast  Jelli

29 Thanks for attending!


Download ppt " Web 2.0: Music Services April 27, 2012. Agenda  Cloud services  Online streaming services  Questions and app sharing by demand."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google