Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hazim Namik Department of Mechanical Engineering

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hazim Namik Department of Mechanical Engineering"— Presentation transcript:

1 Hazim Namik Department of Mechanical Engineering
Deepwater Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Control Methods Hazim Namik Department of Mechanical Engineering

2 Outline Introduction to wind turbines Offshore wind turbines
Wind resource Floating wind turbines Control Methods Summary

3 Introduction Wind energy is the fastest growing renewable energy
Wind energy is a form of solar energy Only 2% of received solar energy is converted to wind Wind turbines convert some of the wind energy to useful mechanical energy

4 Types of Wind Turbines Two main types of wind turbines (WTs)
Vertical axis (VAWT) Horizontal axis (HAWT) HAWT are generally more efficient, hence used for power generation

5 Major Components Blades Hub Nacelle High speed and low speed shafts
Gearbox Generator Yaw drive system Source: US Dept. of Energy

6 Offshore vs. Onshore Winds
Advantages: Stronger and steadier winds Have less turbulence Have less vertical shear Winds are more spatially consistent Disadvantages The winds Interact with waves Offshore winds are harder to measure

7 Vertical Shear Surface roughness at sea is lower; therefore, higher wind speeds at lower heights. Source: Wind Turbines, Erich Hau

8 Offshore Resource Availability
Source: Goldman, P., Offshore Wind Energy, in Workshop on Deep Water Offshore Wind Energy Systems. 2003, Department of Energy.

9 Going Further Offshore
Source: OCS Alternative Energy and Alternate Use Programmatic EIS

10 Deepwater Floating Wind Turbines
Source: Jonkman, J. Development and Verification of a Fully Coupled Simulator for Offshore Wind Turbines

11 NREL 5MW Wind Turbine Barge floating platform 5MW power rating
Source: Barge floating platform 5MW power rating 126m diameter rotor (3 Blades) 90m hub height 153m tall RePower 5MW, 126m diameter rotor Source: RE UK Source: Jonkman, J.M., Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine, in Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences. 2007, University of Colorado: Boulder, Colorado, USA (to be published).

12 General Turbine Control Methods
Control Options Blade Pitch Generator Torque Collective Pitch Individual Pitch Pitch to Feather Pitch to Stall Mode of Operation Principle of Operation

13 Floating Turbine Control Methodology
Simple Onshore Baseline controller Complex Onshore Special Offshore

14 Baseline Controller Overview
Generator torque controller Maximum power below rated wind speed Regulate power above rated Collective pitch controller Regulate generator speed above rated wind speed

15 Platform Pitching – Problem
Factors affecting platform pitching Ocean waves Aerodynamic thrust Mooring lines

16 Modifications to the Baseline Controller
Tower feedback loop Additional blade pitch controller Tower top acceleration feedback Active pitch to stall Extra thrust force when blade is stalled may reduce platform pitching Detuned controller gains Reduced pitch to feather controller gains Source: Jonkman, J.M., Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine, in Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences. 2007, University of Colorado: Boulder, Colorado, USA (to be published).

17 Results – Tower Feedback
Poor power regulation Marginally reduced platform pitching Source: Jonkman, J.M., Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine, in Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences. 2007, University of Colorado: Boulder, Colorado, USA (to be published).

18 Results – Pitch to Stall
Excellent power regulation Large platform oscillations Source: Jonkman, J.M., Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine, in Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences. 2007, University of Colorado: Boulder, Colorado, USA (to be published).

19 Results – Detuned Gains
Reasonable power regulation Reduced platform pitching – but not enough Source: Jonkman, J.M., Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine, in Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences. 2007, University of Colorado: Boulder, Colorado, USA (to be published).

20 Floating Turbine Control Methodology
Current State of Research Worldwide Simple Onshore Baseline controller Classical Control Complex Onshore State space with individual blade pitch Modern Control Nonlinear with individual blade pitch Special Offshore Without adding any actuators Adding necessary actuators

21 Summary Offshore winds are stronger and steadier than onshore winds
Floating turbines are economically feasible for deep waters Classical control was not successful at controlling a floating wind turbine Modern control with state space or nonlinear control is the way to go

22 Thank you

23 % of Water Depths in Different Regions up to 100km Offshore
North Europe 21 26 32 20 South Europe 16 11 23 49 Japan 22 9 18 51 USA 50 13 Source: Henderson, A.R., Support Structures for Floating Offshore Windfarms, in Workshop on Deep Water Offshore Wind Energy Systems. 2003, Department of Energy.

24 Floating Wind Turbines
Reduce the cost of construction for deep waters Can be located close to major demand centres Could interfere with aerial and naval navigation Harder to control as added dynamics of platform motion affect performance

25 Power Regions Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
No power is generated below the cut in speed Region 2 Maximise power capture Region 3 Regulate to the rated power

26 Torque Controller Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Regions 1.5 and 2.5 are linear transitions between the regions

27 Torque Controller Region 2.5 Region 1.0 Region 1.5 Region 2.0

28 Collective Pitch Controller
PI Controller to regulate generator speed Controller gains calculated according to the design parameters ωn = 0.7 rad/s and ζ = 0.7 Simple DOF model with PI controller gives

29 Pitch Sensitivity Power sensitivity to blade pitch is found through linearization of the turbine model Pitch sensitivity varies almost linearly with blade pitch Gain Scheduled PI gains are calculated based on blade pitch through a gain correction factor GK(θ)

30 Gain Scheduled PI Gains

31 Baseline Controller in SIMULINK
Data Extraction and Plotting Controllers FAST Engine

32 Region 2 Torque Gain Derivation

33 R2 Torque Gain Derivation Cont.
Changing to generator torque and HSS speed in rpm and taking pre-cone into account In Region 2, CP = CP,Max and λ = λo For this Turbine: CP,Max= 0.482, λo= 7.55, R= 63m, α=2.5°, and NGear= 97

34 Why N3 At steady state TGen = THSS

35 Pitch Controller Derivation
Single DOF model of the turbine drivetrain gives Taylor approximation of aerodynamic and generator torques gives

36 Pitch Controller Derivation (Contd.)
Pitch commands (Δθ) comes from the PID controller equation By making the following substitution and replacing everything in the equation of motion, we get

37 Pitch Controller Derivation (Contd.)
This is a 2nd order differential equation Expanding ωn and ζ and solving for a PI controller (KD = 0) gives


Download ppt "Hazim Namik Department of Mechanical Engineering"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google