1. 5/19/20101 LD 1827 Stakeholders

2. 5/19/20102 Welcome & Introductions  Mark Hyland – Director, Bureau of Remediation & Waste Management  Ann Gosline – Facilitator E-Mail: agosline@gwi.netagosline@gwi.net Phone: 737-8483

3. 5/19/20103 Legislative Resolve  DEP to Gather Stakeholders & assess Waste Oil Site Remediation Prog: Revenues Raised Enforcement Enhancement Options to increase Funding Premium on out-of-state sales  DEP Report to NRC by Dec 1, 2010

4. Understand multiple Interests Gather important information, get on same page Generate options Gather more information Evaluate Options Combine, reform options Seek agreement, conclusions STAGES OF PROCESS

5. 5/19/20105 Overview – Session 2  Background PBWO Company Sites Waste Oil Site Remediation Prog  Stakeholder Group Participants / Scope Structure

6. 5/19/20106 Wells - Late 1970’s Portland-Bangor Waste Oil Co.  1950’s – 1980  Statewide  5 sites

7. 5/19/20107 Uncontrolled Sites Program  Uncontrolled Sites law: PRPs= Owner / Operator Generator Transporter  Thousands of “generators” for the PBWO operation

8. 5/19/20108 Waste Motor Oil Site Remediation Program

9. 5/19/20109 Waste Oil Remediation Program  Goal: Cover PRP Costs at 4 PBWO sites Plymouth: Hows Corner Superfund site Casco Ellsworth (aka Robbins Property) Presque Isle

10. 5/19/201010 Status of Site Clean-up  Plymouth – PRP Lead Superfund Site Source control, waterline & NRD completed MOM & LTM to start this summer  Casco – DEP Lead Source control completed IC for offsite GW & NRD ongoing  Ellsworth – DEP Lead Source Control Completed Waterline & IC for offsite GW; NRD 2010  Presque Isle – DEP lead Preliminary Investigation completed Need Phase I, ROD & Remedial Action

11. 5/19/201011 Site Cleanup Cost Estimates (Eligible under Waste Oil Remediation Program) SiteCost (Millions of $) Settlement Status Plymouth21.4 (+.54) Completed Ellsworth3.4 Suspended Casco2.6 Suspended Presque Isle2 Not initiated Total30

12. 5/19/201012 Waste Oil Program  Administered by FAME  Grant & Loan Program – Wells & early Plymouth  => Bond Program $30M in revenue backed securities +$5M capital reserve funds

13. 5/19/201013 Waste Oil Program - Changes  2007 – $1-$3 per oil change (repealed 2008)  2008 –$1.10/gal bulk motor veh. lube-oil  2009 – $.35/gal pre-packaged motor & other lube oil

14. 5/19/201014 Clean-up Funds Raised Vs Legislative Goal

15. 5/19/201015 Legislative Resolve  DEP to Gather Stakeholders & assess: Revenues Raised Enforcement Enhancement Options to increase Funding Premium on out-of-state sales  DEP Report by Dec 1, 2010: How to Best Fund Liability of (covered) PRPs at the 4 sites

16. 5/19/201016 Stakeholders: Who to Invite?  Stakeholders Listed  Others? Is a 4-Site solution possible by Dec 1, 2010?

17. 5/19/201017 Some Issues raised last session leading to resolve  Need for more revenue  Enforcement  Amount Lube-oil used/sold in Maine  Price difference between Bulk & pre-packaged  Out of State Purchases  Premium on Lube retailed out-of-state  Leg Changes Impact FAME bonding  Program Efficiency  Order in which sites are funded  Premium on Other lubricating oils  Premium on other oil / other revenue sources

18. 5/19/201018 Stakeholders: Who to Invite?  Stakeholders Listed  Others? Is a 4-Site solution possible by Dec 1, 2010? - maybe Can DEP defer cost-recovery?

19. Uncontrolled Sites Fund State lead Sites Cost Recovery Clean-up

20. 5/19/201020 Uncontrolled Sites Fund & Remediation Programs Uncontrolled Sites Fund State Lead Sites VRAP “RLF” & Insurance Brownfield Grant Match credible Enforcement Military Sites “all other” Unresolved Public Health Threats Unresolved Liability under CERCLA & USP Tort Claims Superfund Match X PRP Lead Sites

21. 5/19/201021 Stakeholders: Who to Invite?  Stakeholders Listed  Others? Is a 4-Site solution possible by Dec 1, 2010? - maybe Can DEP defer cost-recovery? - No Is sustainable USF necessary to resolve liability at the 4-Sites?  Maybe  Necessary in the long-run

22. 5/19/201022 Stakeholders: Structure?  Parallel Stakeholder Groups? 4-Site Solution Sustainable USP  A Combined Stakeholder Group?  Hybrid – combined policy group with 2 technical subgroups?

23. 5/19/201023 END

24. Proposed Groundrules  Help get everyone information  Listen to understand, not to refute  Stay open to new information, ideas  Focus on finding solutions, be creative  Be concise, leave time for others  Let others finish, wait to be recognized  Don’t characterize each others’ views

25. 5/19/201025 END

26. 5/19/201026 Reserve Slides – In case the issue comes up

27. 5/19/201027 Parallel or combined Stakeholder Groups? 4 site solution May 2010 DEC 2010 DEC 2011 USP Revamp

28. 5/19/201028 Parallel or combined Stakeholder Groups? May 2010 DEC 2010 DEC 2011 USP Revamp 4 site solution

29. 5/19/201029 Parallel or combined Stakeholder Groups? 4 site solution Subgroup May 2010 DEC 2010 DEC 2011 USP Revamp Subgroup