Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Www.smcoe.org LCAP and Accountability Meeting January 23, 2015 J Jesus Contreras Accountability and Compliance Coordinator Accountability – Innovation.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Www.smcoe.org LCAP and Accountability Meeting January 23, 2015 J Jesus Contreras Accountability and Compliance Coordinator Accountability – Innovation."— Presentation transcript:

1 LCAP and Accountability Meeting January 23, 2015 J Jesus Contreras Accountability and Compliance Coordinator Accountability – Innovation - Results

2 AGENDA 1. LCAP: > Annual Update > Goals; Expenditures; CORE Program 2. Accountability: > LCAP; LEAP; SPSA Alignment and Other Plans Alignment > Goals; Expenditures; CORE Program and Federal Revenue (T1) > State and Federal Accountability 3. Calendar Updates: > LCAP Timeline

3 Resources: Episode 9 and 10 – SBE NEW Template videos/ California Department of Education (CDE) LCFF web page at:

4 Resources: Please note that the date for LCAP Webinar Part 3 has recently changed. The most up-to-date information is below. The LCAP Webinar Part 3 – Making Data Meaningful in the LCAP will be presented from 3:30-4:30 p.m. on Monday, February 2, You may view the latest post at

5 LCFF-LCAP - Mindset The revision/update of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) will continue to be rooted in the principles for EQUITY established in the Local Control funding Formula (LCFF) statute:  Improved student outcomes & elimination of subgroup gaps  Subsidiarity – LCAP Goals, Actions and Services  Results  Transparency  Stakeholder Engagement

6 LCFF/LCAP State Priorities

7 8 State Priorities and Related Data Elements Needs Assessment Goals Resource Alignment Services Outcomes Student Achievement  Performance on assessments  Academic Performance Index  College and Career Readiness  English learners becoming reclassified and proficient  Advanced Placement Exams passage  Prepared through Early Assessment Program Basic Services  Rate of teacher mis-assignments  Student Access to standards- aligned instructional resources and materials  Facilities Course Access  Student access and enrollment in courses of study Student Engagement  School attendance rates  Chronic absenteeism rates  Middle School dropout rates  High School dropout rates  High School graduation rates School Climate  Student suspension rates  Student expulsion rates  Other local measures Implementation of CCSS  CCSS implementation results for all students, including English learners Parental Involvement  Efforts to seek parent input  Promotion of parental participation and leadership Other Student Outcomes  Other indicators of student performance in courses of study. May include performance and other exams. 7

8 Revised LCAP S ECTION 2: G OALS, A CTIONS, E XPENDITURES, AND P ROGRESS INDICATORS S ECTION 1: S TAKEHOLDER E NGAGEMENT S ECTION 3: U SE OF S UPPLEMENTAL AND C ONCENTRATION G RANT F UNDS AND P ROPORTIONALITY A NNUAL U PDATE

9 “New” LCAP Section 2 ( ) GOAL: Related State and/or Local Priorities: 1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__ 6__ 7__ 8__ COE only: 9__ 10__ Local : Specify _____________________ Identified Need : Goal Applies to: School s: Applicable Pupil Subgroups: LCAP Year 1: xxxx-xx Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: Actions/Services Scope of Service Pupils to be served within identified scope of service Budgeted Expenditures __ALL OR: __Low Income pupils __English Learners __Foster Youth __Redesignated fluent English proficient __Other Subgroups:(Specify)________________________

10 Revised LCAP S ECTION 2: G OALS, A CTIONS, E XPENDITURES, AND P ROGRESS INDICATORS S ECTION 1: S TAKEHOLDER E NGAGEMENT S ECTION 3: U SE OF S UPPLEMENTAL AND C ONCENTRATION G RANT F UNDS AND P ROPORTIONALITY A NNUAL U PDATE

11 Annual Update Annual Update Instructions: For each goal in the prior LCAP year, review the progress toward the expected annual outcome(s) based on, at a minimum, the required metrics pursuant to Education Code sections and The review must include an assessment of the effectiveness of the specific actions. Describe any changes to the actions or goals the LEA will take as a result of the review and assessment. In addition, review the applicability of each goal in the LCAP.

12 Annual Update-Guiding Questions How do we need to report to ALL stakeholders about the Goals, Actions and Services included in the LCAP? Provide evidence to stakeholders

13 Complete a copy of this table for each of the LEA’s goals in the prior year LCAP. Duplicate and expand the fields as necessary. Annual Update

14

15 Complete a copy of this table for each of the LEA’s goals in the prior year LCAP. Duplicate and expand the fields as necessary. Annual Update Important for business and program staff to work together for Estimated Actual Annual Expenditure column.

16 Annual Update Considerations  Update is completed in conjunction with the next year’s LCAP  Gather data on actions and services that are being provided to share with stakeholders  Review data as measured by required and locally determined by required and locally determined metrics  Be ready to communicate which quantitative and qualitative data/metrics were examined to review progress on LCAP goals  What goals, actions/services need to be calibrated?

17 Annual Update Considerations  Create opportunities for stakeholders to gain capacity in understanding data/metrics  Make sure to provide clear information on: - Services and actions that have been provided - Services and actions that are yet to be provided - Estimated Actual Annual Expenditures - Availability and Use of Metrics > Use the LCAP Annual Update Appendices to communicate

18 Base-Program and MPP What Constitutes the District’s Base- Program? Supplement v. Supplant in the era of LCAP State v. Federal Resources

19 Minimum Proportionality Percentage  MPP is the lowest level of increased or improved services for unduplicated students  A minimum, not a maximum  Services funded with LCFF  Not federal or other restricted  Services are above those provided for all students (base program)  Not above services in prior year  Not a maintenance of effort calculation  In the LCAP year  Not the current year  Can calculate additional years for transition planning

20 Minimum Proportionality Percentage At full LCFF implementation The MPP calculation is: *Less TIIG and Transportation (add-ons) Supplemental & Concentration Grants All Other LCFF Funding* % MPP

21 LCAP 3A-Describe Expenditures Key Changes – 5 CCR  Funded – Added to the requirement to identify those services that are being funded in addition to identifying services being provided on a districtwide and schoolwide basis  Principally – Added to section related to describing how districtwide and schoolwide services are principally directed towards meeting the district’s goals for its unduplicated pupils  And are effective in – Added to related to describing how districtwide and schoolwide services are effective in meeting the district’s goals for its unduplicated pupils  Provide basis for this determination – Added to the requirement that the description provided for districtwide and schoolwide services provide the basis for this determination, including, but not limited to, any alternatives considered and any supporting research, experience, or educational theory

22 LCAP 3A – Describe Expenditures Describe how LEA is expending S&C funds in the LCAP Year LOW-INCOME PUPILS ENGLISH LEARNERS FOSTER YOUTH If DISTRICTWIDE, SCHOOLWIDE, COUNTYWIDE, or CHARTERWIDE REDESIGNATED FLUENT ENGLISH PROFICIENT OTHER SUBGROUPS FOSTER YOUTH

23 LCAP 3A – Describe Expenditures  Clearly defining base to determine services above and beyond what is provided to all students  What an LEA would provide to all students if no S&C funds received  Starting point for determining services above and beyond what is provided to all students  Will look different for most districts

24 55% + Unduplicated Students* Identify services funded and provided Describe how services are: – Principally directed toward (local discretion) – Effective in meeting goals for unduplicated students Less than 55%** Identify services funded and provided Describe how services are: – Principally directed toward (local discretion) – Effective in meeting goals for unduplicated students Describe how services are most effective: – Include basis for determination – Any alternatives considered – Supporting research, experience, or educational theory District-wide Use of Funds *Note: Current or prior year **Note: Current year only

25 40% + Unduplicated Students* Identify services funded and provided Describe how services are: – Principally directed toward (local discretion) – Effective in meeting goals for unduplicated students Less than 40%** Identify services funded and provided Describe how services are: – Principally directed toward (local discretion) – Effective in meeting goals for unduplicated students Describe how services are most effective: – Include basis for determination – Any alternatives considered – Supporting research, experience, or educational theory School-wide Use of Funds **Note: Current year enrollment only *Note: Enrollment in current or prior year

26 What about Federal Revenue? Requires Clear Definition of the District’s Base-Program? Supplement v. Supplant FPM and Federal Resources Accountability – On-Site Reviews

27 LCAP; SPSA; and LEA Plans Relationship and Timeline

28

29 SSC Responsibilities Develop SPSA, monitor SPSA, and evaluate the activities and expenditures for Con App programs operated at the school to improve student achievement, and Added legal responsibilities by state and federal legislatures. (Education Code Section 64001) 29

30 Suggested Timeline for July – December 2014 Identify and consult stakeholders Review LCAP goals, actions and services for needed adjustments Update progress Review available data for Annual Report Develop timeline for data collection and reporting Report demographic information via CALPADS Review alignment of district & site plans with LCAP January - March 2015 Consult stakeholders Continue modification of LCAP and updating progress on Annual Report Review proposed state budget ( ) and local implications Submit 2 nd Interim Budget report April - June 2015 Consult stakeholders Review May revision of proposed State budget ( ) and local implications Invite public comment on draft LCAP Present draft LCAP to PACs Respond to comments in writing Finalize Annual Report Hold LCAP and budget public hearing Receive local board approval Submit to SMCOE Receive LCAPs from charter schools

31 Suggested Local Accountability Calendar - 1 Goals/Metrics Refinement District Plan(s) Alignment SMCOE Feedback Integration LCAP Refinement Nov./Dec Site plan-LCAP alignment Document/report on federal funds Identify LCAP implications SPSA Alignment and Revision Dec Feb LCAP refinement based on Site Plan input LCAP/2nd Interim submitted to local board for approval LCAP & 2nd Interim Budget Reporting March15, 2014

32 Suggested Local Accountability Calendar - 2 SPSA data update to sites Site-based LCAP input/feedback garnered SPSA Monitoring & Reporting March/April 2015 Aggregated data report Site input/feedback integration LCAP refinment (as needed) & District-wide committee engagements LCAP Refinment April./May 2015 LCAP/Final Budget submitted to board for approval LCAP/Final Budget June 30, 2015

33 33 Resources for Stakeholder Engagement

34 Questions? 34


Download ppt "Www.smcoe.org LCAP and Accountability Meeting January 23, 2015 J Jesus Contreras Accountability and Compliance Coordinator Accountability – Innovation."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google