2. SUPREME COURT CASES

3. The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale B.Miller v. California C.Gideon v. Wainwright D.Mapp v. Ohio 1

4. The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A. A. B. B. C.Gideon v. Wainwright D. D. 1

5. In this 1833 case the Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights only limited actions of the federal government, not the states. A.Marbury v. Madison B.McCulloch v. Maryland C.Barron v. Baltimore D.Gibbons v. Ogden 2

6. In this 1833 case the Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights only limited actions of the federal government, not the states. A. A. B. B. C.Barron v. Baltimore D. D. 2

7. The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protects newspapers from “prior restraint”. A.Lemon v. Kurtzman B.Near v. Minnesota C.Zelmon v. Simmons-Harris D.Texas v. Johnson 3

8. The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protects newspapers from “prior restraint”. A. A. B.Near v. Minnesota C. C. D. D. 3

9. In this case the Supremes held that Congress has powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution (“necessary and proper” clause). A.Gibbons v. Ogden B.McCulloch v. Maryland C.Barron v. Baltimore D.Marbury v. Madison 4

10. In this case the Supremes held that Congress has powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution (“necessary and proper” clause). A. A. B.McCulloch v. Maryland C. C. D. D. 4

11. The Supreme Court held that the 4 th Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure applies to the states. A.Mapp v. Ohio B.Miller v. California C.Miranda v. Arizona D.Gregg v. Georgia 5

12. The Supreme Court held that the 4 th Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure applies to the states. A.Mapp v. Ohio B. B. C. C. D. D. 5

13. The Supreme Court held that abortion is legal, as a matter of “privacy”. A.Roth v. U.S. B.Roe v. Wade C.Webster v. Health Services D.Planned Parenthood v. Casey 6

14. The Supreme Court held that abortion is legal, as a matter of “privacy”. A. A. B.Roe v. Wade C. C. D. D. 6

15. The Supreme Court held that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the 1 st Amendment. A.Gregg v. Georgia B.Gitlow v. New York C.NY Times v. Sullivan D.Schenck v. U.S. 7

16. The Supreme Court held that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the 1 st Amendment. A. A. B. B. C. C. D.Schenck v. U.S. 7

17. In this case the Supreme Court held that it holds the power of judicial review and has the right to determine Constitutional meaning. A.McCulloch v. Maryland B.Gibbons v. Ogden C.Marbury v. Madison D.Barron v. Baltimore 8

18. In this case the Supreme Court held that it holds the power of judicial review and has the right to determine Constitutional meaning. A. A. B. B. C.Marbury v. Madison D. D. 8

19. The Supremes decision that sets guidelines for police questioning of accused persons; serves to protect people against self-incrimination. A.Gitlow v. New York B.Gregg v. Georgia C.Roth v. U.S. D.Miranda v. Arizona 9

20. The Supremes decision that sets guidelines for police questioning of accused persons; serves to protect people against self-incrimination. A. A. B. B. C. C. D.Miranda v. Arizona 9

21. In this case the Supreme Court held that the 1 st Amendment protection of speech applies to the states as well as the federal government. A.Gitlow v. New York B.NY Times v. Sullivan C.NY Times v. U.S. D.FCC v. Pacifica Foundation 10

22. In this case the Supreme Court held that the 1 st Amendment protection of speech applies to the states as well as the federal government. A.Gitlow v. New York B. B. C. C. D. D. 10

23. The Supremes held that burning of the American flag is protected as “symbolic speech” under the 1 st Amendment. A.Roth v. United States B.Miller v. California C.Brandenburg v. Ohio D.Texas v. Johnson 11

24. The Supremes held that burning of the American flag is protected as “symbolic speech” under the 1 st Amendment. A. A. B. B. C. C. D.Texas v. Johnson 11

25. In this case the Supreme Court held that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press. A.Roth v. United States B.NY Times v. Sullivan C.NY Times v. U.S. D.FCC v. Pacifica Foundation 12

26. In this case the Supreme Court held that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press. A.Roth v. United States B. B. C. C. D. D. 12

27. The Supremes held that speech is not protected if it encourages imminent lawless actions. A.New York Times v. Sullivan B.Zurcher v. Stanford Daily C.Brandenburg v. Ohio D.FCC v. Pacifica Foundation 13

28. The Supremes held that speech is not protected if it encourages imminent lawless actions. A. A. B. B. C.Brandenburg v. Ohio D. D. 13

29. In this case the Supreme Court decided to leave it to local communities to decide whether material is obscene and therefore unprotected by the 1 st Amendment. A.Miller v. California B.NY Times v. Sullivan C.Miami Herald v. Tornillo D.FCC v. Pacifica Foundation 14

30. In this case the Supreme Court decided to leave it to local communities to decide whether material is obscene and therefore unprotected by the 1 st Amendment. A.Miller v. California B. B. C. C. D. D. 14

31. The Supremes upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, meaning it is not “cruel and unusual punishment” under the 8 th Amendment. A.NAACP v. Alabama B.Griswold v. Connecticut C.Engel v. Vitale D.Gregg v. Georgia 15

32. The Supremes upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, meaning it is not “cruel and unusual punishment” under the 8 th Amendment. A. A. B. B. C. C. D.Gregg v. Georgia 15

33. The Supremes held that public officials must prove “actual malice” and “reckless disregard for the truth” to win a libel suit against the press. A.New York Times v. Sullivan B.Zurcher v. Stanford Daily C.Red Lion Broadcasting v. F.C.C. D.FCC v. Pacifica Foundation 16

34. The Supremes held that public officials must prove “actual malice” and “reckless disregard for the truth” to win a libel suit against the press. A.New York Times v. Sullivan B. B. C. C. D. D. 16

35. The Supremes held that the “no prior restraint” rule prevented the government from stopping the publishing of the “Pentagon Papers”. A.New York Times v. United States B.Washington Post v. Nixon C.Ellsberg v. United States D.New York Times v. Nixon 17

36. The Supremes held that the “no prior restraint” rule prevented the government from stopping the publishing of the “Pentagon Papers”. A.New York Times v. United States B. B. C. C. D. D. 17

37. In this case the Supreme Court held state officials violated the 1 st Amendment when it had schoolchildren recite a prayer it wrote. A.Zelman v. Simmons-Harris B.Engel v. Vitale C.Lemon v. Kurtzman D.Griswold v. Connecticut 18

38. In this case the Supreme Court held state officials violated the 1 st Amendment when it had schoolchildren recite a prayer it wrote. A. A. B.Engel v. Vitale C. C. D. D. 18

39. In this case the Supreme Court held that a state could provide families with vouchers to be used to pay tuition at religious schools. A.Zelman v. Simmons-Harris B.The Pope v. United States C.Lime v. Kurtzman D.Griswold v. Connecticut 19

40. In this case the Supreme Court held that a state could provide families with vouchers to be used to pay tuition at religious schools. A.Zelman v. Simmons-Harris B. B. C. C. D. D. 19

41. A.Carlin v. FCC B.FCC v. Pacifica Foundation C.&%$# v. United States 20 The Seven Words you cannot say on radio or TV are... CENSORED

42. A. A. B.FCC v. Pacifica Foundation C. C. 20 The Seven Words you cannot say on radio or TV are... CENSORED