Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byOswin Franklin Modified over 2 years ago

1
An evaluation of alternative binning approaches for composition data in integrated stock assessments Cole Monnahan, Sean Anderson, Felipe Hurtado, Kotaro Ono, Merrill Rudd, Juan Valero, Kelli Johnson, Roberto Licandeo, Christine Stawitz, Allan Hicks, Ian Taylor

2
Intro Extensive literature exists on effective sample size and likelihood structure of composition data There are no studies investigating implications of different bin widths SS3 has separate population and data bins Thus there is no general advice for how analysts should process length data

3
Current Practices

4
Study Aim Investigate implications of different binning strategies for estimation of growth Approach Simulate a variety of length bin widths for different life histories, data types/quantities, and fisheries properties Expected output Provide information on good practices for how to bin length data in integrated stock assessments

5
Experimental Design Simulations performed using ss3sim, with SS3 as operating (OM) and estimation (EM) models. Variety of length bins (e.g. 2cm to 15cm), unequal bins (e.g. same # fish in each bin), or based on biology Data will vary by type (age, length, conditional age-at-length), timing and quantity Growth parameters estimated, fixed at truth or biased values

6
Experimental Design Biological assumptions – Life history: flatfish-like (yellowtail flounder) and cod-like (North Sea cod). – Natural mortality fixed at truth – BH SR function w/ h fixed at truth, R 0 estimated. – Weight/length and maturity fixed at truth – VBK growth constant in OM and EM, with all EM parameters estimated.

7
Experimental Design Fishery assumptions – 1 fishery starting in year 25, with two fishing patterns (constant and two-way trip); 1 survey – OM fishery selectivity is time-invariant asymptotic and estimated in the EM. – Catchability coefficients constant + estimated – No ageing error (for now) – Process error through recruitment

8
Input files starter control data forecast SS3 ss3sim : Big picture

9
Input files starter control data forecast SS3 Output with results Report.sso CompReport.sso covar.sso Forecast-report.sso Output for debugging warning.sso echoinput.sso ParmTrace.sso Mirrored Output starter.ss_new control.ss_new data.ss_new forecast.ss_new r4ss ss3sim : Big picture

10
Input files starter control data forecast SS3 Output with results Report.sso CompReport.sso covar.sso Forecast-report.sso Output for debugging warning.sso echoinput.sso ParmTrace.sso Mirrored Output starter.ss_new control.ss_new data.ss_new forecast.ss_new r4ss ss3sim ss3sim : Big picture

11
Reproducible, flexible, and rapid end-to-end simulation framework: OM -> Data -> EM -> analysis – all within R, using SS3 for both models Designed to programmatically induce structural differences to SS3 models (control, data, starter files) Useful for testing: model performance, model misspecification, value of data, etc. Note: It does not use SS3 bootstrapping.

12
ss3sim : Package details Software –Open source, cross platform (Windows, OS X, Linux). –Requires: SS3.24O, R >= 3.0.0, r4ss Availability –CRAN ( http://cran.r-project.org/package=ss3sim ) –Development version ( www.github.com/ss3sim/ss3sim ) Contents –SS3 models, modified for simulation with ss3sim –R functions for modifying models, running simulations, and extracting/plotting results

13
How to change data bins in SS3 The population bins are left at a fine scale. Change input.dat file in OM to have specified bin structure, so that output (data.ss_new) contains the bins you want This accounts for selectivity for each fleet and true population dynamics is the same across binning scenarios

14
Preliminary Runs Using cod and flatfish models with 4 data scenarios: – Lengths for fishery and survey or fishery only – Ages for fishery and survey or no data – All growth parameters estimated

15
Results: L min

16
Results: L inf

17
Results: CV Young

18
Results: CV Old

19
Results: K

20
Results: MSY

21
Summary of Results Very preliminary (with convergence issues), but… Bin width especially important for stocks w/ large growth CVs. CV young and Lmin are most sensitive to the bin structure, other parameters not as much Larger bins actually took longer to run b/c of convergence issues, but in general we expect them to be faster We expect optimal trade-off between performance and run time depends on life history and data scenario

22
Next steps 1.Expand to more life histories, exploitation patterns, data scenarios 2.Easy to add complexity w/ ss3sim but what to add so the results add to understanding? 1.Add time-varying growth or selectivity to OM? 2.Add misspecification of (time-varying) growth, selectivity? 3.Which parameters to estimate/fix? 3.Add conditional age-at-length data

23
Thanks Thanks to Andre Punt, Mark Maunder, and Ian Stewart for advice CAPAM for hosting and letting us talk …. Questions?

24
Sampling conditional age-at-length (CAL) data 1.For each fleet (fl) and year (y): 1.Multinomial sample from true length distribution L of sample size N len from the length comps. This mimics sampling fish from length bins. 2.Using these proportions, multinomial sample of size N age. This gives sample sizes for each CAL observation N CAL. 3.For length bins with N CAL >0, multinomial sample of true CAL distribution of size N CAL.

26
Tail compression Given p, compress lower and upper tail of length comps such that both contain p. E.g. if p=.1 then the first and last bin will contain 10% of the data. Note: p<0 is a different case than p=0.

27
Robustification Constant Constant added to both expected and observed values of length bins Supposed to help stabilize optimization. Implemented as change_lcomp_constant function

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google