Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Summit on Lean and Process Improvement for Environmental Agencies in the Northeast May 28, 2014 Douglas Fine, Assistant Commissioner for Planning & Evaluation.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Summit on Lean and Process Improvement for Environmental Agencies in the Northeast May 28, 2014 Douglas Fine, Assistant Commissioner for Planning & Evaluation."— Presentation transcript:

1 Summit on Lean and Process Improvement for Environmental Agencies in the Northeast May 28, 2014 Douglas Fine, Assistant Commissioner for Planning & Evaluation Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection

2  Integrated online Secretariat-wide IT system  Automate standardized business processes  Share data transparently  Use state-of-the-art information technology  Improved tools for businesses, the public, and EEA agencies  Cost: $40 million over 5 years  Pre-Design work began in 2011  Begin design work in July 2014  EIPAS functions begin rolling out

3 Tools for Businesses/Regulated Entities: 24/7 access to permit & reporting status One on-line place for reporting, compliance payments, etc. Step-by-step permit application guidance (incl. sample permits; completeness checks,..) Tools for General Public/Advocates: Map-based “point & click” access to regulated activities Easy dive into deeper content (incl. permits held, spill notifications, compliance status/history,..) Tools for MassDEP: Computerized administrative completeness & compliance screening Automated (or IT-assisted) agency responses Improved management tools 3

4

5

6

7 In order to maximize the value of the IT redesign, MassDEP is: ◦ Optimizing and aligning agency work practices (called Agency Process Optimization) ◦ Establishing common data standards across all programs and locations 7

8  Before IT design begins, engage with staff who “do the work” to: ◦ Align practices across programs & offices ◦ Make simple improvements in work flows ◦ Document agency processes/work flows  APO helps: ◦ Provide clear consistent documentation to designers ◦ Reduce the number of workflows for EIPAS ◦ Avoid “coding” current inefficiencies 8

9  Inventory processes (agency-wide)  Prioritize processes for APO  Identify optimizations (for a handful of processes) ◦ mapping current workflows ◦ identifying ways to standardize and improve ◦ mapping future workflows  Implement optimizations (for these processes) ◦ codifying future-state workflows ◦ creating SOPs, template docs, etc.  Expand optimizations (across all programs, for each process) 9

10  Processes Inventoried (Winter 2013)  Selected three for first APOs (Winter 2013): ◦ Permitting, Complaint Management, Reporting  Identified Optimizations (Winter 2013) : ◦ Permitting: 3 Air Permits; 2 Groundwater Permits ◦ Complaint Management: Air, Wetlands, Strike Force ◦ Reporting: Environmental Results Program [Done via intensive “workshops” – 2 to 4 days] 10

11  Implemented these Optimizations (Summer/Fall 2013) [Done via periodic team meetings w/assignments]  Expanding Permitting Optimizations to all permits (Winter/Spring 2014) ( aka Assimilation) [Done via consultation sessions w/individuals or small groups] 11

12 Map Current State Identify Opportunities and Solutions Develop High Level Action Plan Map Future State Standardization Steps Current State MapFuture State Map The Winter 2013 workshops followed 4 key steps to identify pre-design process changes and map a standardized “future state” process. 12

13 1.0 Standard Procedures: ◦ Staff checklists for internal documentation of permit review ◦ Guidance to support internal document sharing ◦ Internal SOPs for administrative tasks & PIMS entry 2.0 Supporting Documents & Templates: ◦ Applicant checklists for complete submittals ◦ Document templates (Admin Review Completed, Confirming Withdrawal of Application) 3.0 New Tools & Capabilities: ◦ Decision trees for applicants ◦ Templates/forms for GW applicants to self-certify ownership & control and financial/operational responsibility 4.0 Staff Training on Permit Writing: ◦ Determine need for, and contents of staff training (must first clarify the “problem to be solved”) ◦ Develop or provide the training 13

14 Conduct “consultation sessions” to: ◦ Identify key variations from a baseline workflow ◦ Put permits into “families” ◦ Generate permit workflow diagrams for each family ◦ Collect standard documents & templates in use ◦ Identify new std docs / SOPs that would be helpful ◦ Record process improvement recommendations See sample workflow charts (on wall) 14

15

16  Finish Assimilation for all Permits  Additional Implementation Work (pre-EIPAS Website Changes) for Complaints Management  APO for Revenue Collection & Management  APO for Routine Reporting  Additional APO (TBD) 16

17 Activity / Role# of PeopleDuration of Commitment # of Days Project Management Team 12On-going (began Dec. 2012) 1 day/week Project Sponsors3On-going1 day/month Identification12 per process3 weeks each4 days total per person Implementation12 per process12 weeks each4 days total per person Assimilation45 for permitting 16 weeks1 day total per person 17

18  Std documentation of workflows & std templates are very helpful  Some pre-design testing is valuable  Lean “Lite” isn’t enough time  Make “identification” and “implementation” the same step  More frequent sr. sponsor engagement w/teams (daily?)  Need good facilitators  Line staff need coaching to develop program- wide implementation guidance 18

19  Event “playbook” (for Identifying Optimizations)  Event facilitator resources  Sample materials ◦ Charters & scopes ◦ Meeting invitations ◦ Event agendas ◦ Implementation memos, etc. 19

20 Change Management 20

21 The following perceptions were raised by staff in Fall 2013:  EIPAS will limit staff flexibility thus limiting our value-added  EIPAS will replace people/result in layoffs  EIPAS is too big & ambitious to get done  EIPAS will only be a glorified fee collection system  EIPAS will fade away with the next governor 21

22  Establish a clear vision  Top down communication to highlight priorities  Bottom up engagement with staff to help plan for a system based on client needs and to build “ownership” of the system 22

23 Routinely share EIPAS & APO information and engage personnel via: ◦ Weekly updates at Commissioner’s Senior Staff meetings ◦ Monthly decisions/acceptance sessions at Senior Leadership meetings ◦ Monthly updates at Bureau & Regional 1 st line supervisors meetings ◦ Periodic All-Staff “Road Shows” (began 2014) ◦ Periodic Commissioner’s All-Staff s ◦ Bi-Weekly Sponsor Meetings 23

24  Significant time/effort for APO & Data Standards  Persistent staff engagement & communications  Strong commitment from senior agency heads  Committed Project Management Teams and Sponsor Group  Dedicated project support/coordination 24

25 25


Download ppt "Summit on Lean and Process Improvement for Environmental Agencies in the Northeast May 28, 2014 Douglas Fine, Assistant Commissioner for Planning & Evaluation."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google