Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMagdalene Harvey Modified over 9 years ago
1
May 9, 2015 Or how I began to think about nonlinear career development Climbing off the Ladder, Before we fall off.
2
1 Who is this Chris Angove person? Graduated with BS in CS from the University of Michigan Spent 10 years as a C++ Developer Started leading in 2005 (reluctantly) Associate Director of Engineering at Amplify in Brooklyn in 2012 Joined Spotify as a Chapter Lead in 2013 Always been interested in engineering culture and career development
3
2 Quick Overview of Spotify
4
3
5
4 Began with Agile, but process got in the way At beginning process was vital to creating the team As we grow, teams tried to figure out how to remain agile Implement new structure in 2012 Continuously tweaking process
6
5 Alignment & Autonomy Henrik Kniberg Alignment Do what I say! Autonomy Do whateve r False dichotomy
7
6 High Alignmen t High Autonomy Build a bridge! Micromanaging organization Indifferent culture Entrepreneurial organization Chaotic culture Authoritative organization Conformist culture Innovative organization Collaborative culture We need to cross the river Figure out how! We need to cross the river Low Alignmen t Low Autonomy Hope someone is working on the river problem… Aligned Autonomy! Henrik Kniberg
8
7 Not so original, original idea PO Tribe Tribe lead PO Tribe Chapter Tribe lead PO Chapter Guild
9
8 Reality is Messy! PO Tribe Tribe lead PO Tribe Tribe lead PO Chapter Guild
10
9 Aligned Autonomy - be autonomous, but don’t suboptimize - Spotify’s mission > Squad’s mission Henrik Kniberg
11
10 Mutual respect My colleagues are awesome! Ego Henrik Kniberg
12
11 Walking the usual path The Linear Ladder
13
12 Intern Junior DeveloperSenior Software EngineerArchitectTeam LeadDirector of EngineeringVP of EngineeringCTO
14
13 Each rung is clearly tied to role and responsibility The Benefits of the Ladder
15
14 Path of Career Development is Clear The Benefits of the Ladder
16
15 Easy to get Resources The Benefits of the Ladder
17
16 Value added to the company is obvious to all The Benefits of the Ladder
18
17 Explicit path for respect and being recognized for achievements The Benefits of the Ladder
19
18 Simplicity sometimes has it’s cost What’s the Danger?
20
19 Reality is rarely simple, more often it’s messy What’s wrong with the ladder
21
20 We have usually preferred to keep structure flat, only defining positions based on role not seniority What’s wrong with the ladder
22
21 The only way to add value is predefined by structure What’s wrong with the ladder
23
22 May not have the skill set or interest for the next level on the ladder What’s wrong with the ladder
24
23 No way to try out things, moving down the ladder is difficult What’s wrong with the ladder
25
24 Creates a factory to eject people due to limited management positions What’s wrong with the ladder
26
25 May promote people beyond their abilities and thus out of the company What’s wrong with the ladder
27
26 Ultimately it provides simplicity at the cost of actual career development What’s wrong with the ladder
28
27 Assumes plateauing at a specific role is bad, but why? What’s wrong with the ladder
29
28 There has to be a better way! What’s wrong with the ladder Right?!?!
30
29 An increasingly popular approach Multiple Ladders
31
30 The Technology Ladder
32
31 Creates a technology track to reduce skillset/interest mismatches The Technology Ladder
33
32 Clearly sets up easy ways to recognize accomplishments The Technology Ladder
34
33 Still very clear routes and roles setup as in linear ladder The Technology Ladder
35
34 But…. The Technology Ladder
36
35 Limited as it still sets up explicit roles The Technology Ladder
37
36 Usually gets muddled (http://bit.ly/1oS7H9l) The Technology Ladder
38
37 Still assumes that the only way to grow is through more responsibility/control The Technology Ladder
39
38 Does not answer how to experiment and switch roles The Technology Ladder
40
39 What we call Add - Ons A non-linear approach
41
40 A nonlinear model
42
41 Roles defined by institutional need, not career advancement A nonlinear model
43
42 Add-ons add both personal as well as business value A nonlinear model
44
43 Interest and skill-set define which add-on the engineer chooses A nonlinear model
45
44 It is engineer driven but supported by the company A nonlinear model Manager works with the engineer Trainings, sessions, workshops provided as needed Time off to participate in events approved
46
45 Driving forces: A nonlinear model
47
46 Do things; tell people A nonlinear model You’re doing cool stuff that others would benefit from hearing about You’re passionate about something and you’d like to see more of it You’d like recognition for your efforts
48
47 Try Something New A nonlinear model Work is great but getting a little bored You’d like to try something new, but not stop what you are doing Not sure you want to risk switching roles completely
49
48 Get out of the Comfort Zone A nonlinear model You’d like to acquire new skills You need to push yourself in a new direction Shake things up to see what latent skills are there
50
49 Employee chooses add-ons or creates a new one: A nonlinear model Define Goal Define Success Metrics Define Help Needed
51
50 A Few Examples A nonlinear model Speaker Trainer Coach Mentor Writer Architect Evangelist Road Manager Open Sourcer
52
51 This is a work in progress A nonlinear model Testing our hypothesis now Initial steps in 2013 were a bit slow But we’re refining, check back with us soon!
53
52 This is not solved we need to innovate Yes this is a call to action! Email me cangove@spotify.comcangove@spotify.com What are your ideas?
54
53 Check out spotify.com/jobs or @Spotifyjobs for more information.spotify.com/jobs Want to join the band?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.