Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byEustacia Bell Modified over 2 years ago

1
Model specification (identification) We already know about the sample autocorrelation function (SAC): Properties: Not unbiased (since a ratio between two random variables) Bias decreases with n Variance complicated, common to use general large-sample results

2
Large-sample results (asymptotics): For large n the random vector has an approximate multivariate normal distribution with zero mean vector and covariance matrix ( c ij ) where This gives that Var (r k ) 0 as n does not diminish as n

3
Hence, the distribution of r k will depend on the correlation structure of Y t and accordingly on the model behind (i.e. if it is and AR(1), an ARMA(2,1) etc.) For an AR(1), i.e. Y t = Y t – 1 + e t For an MA(q) i.e. not dependent on k after the qth lag i.e. not dependent on k for large lags For white noise

5
Partial autocorrelation function Describes the “specific” part of the correlation between Y t and Y t – k that is not due to successive serial correlations between the variables Y t – 1, Y t – 2, …, Y t – k. Partial correlations are used for other types of data as well (for instance in linear models of cross-sectional data. Patterns For an AR(p)-process, k cuts off after lag p (i.e. the same type of behaviour like k has for an MA(q)-process For an MA(q)-process k shows approximately the same pattern as does k for an AR(p)-process

6
Estimation from data, Sample Partial Autocorrelation function (SPAC): No explicit formula, estimation has to be made recursively Properties of SPAC: More involved, but for an AR(p)-process SPAC-values for lags greater than p are approximately normally distributed with zero mean and variance 1/n

7
Extended Autocorrelation function (EACF) One (of several) tool to improve the choice of orders of ARMA(p, q)-processes. Very clear as a theoretical function, but noisy when estimated on series not too long. AR, MA or ARMA?

8
No pattern at all?

9
EACF table for Y AR/MA 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 1 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 2 x o o o o o o o o o o o o o 3 o o x o o o o o o o o o o o 4 x o o o o o o o o o o o o o 5 x x o o o o o o o o o o o o 6 o x o o o x o o o o o o o o 7 o o o o o x o o o o o o o o ARMA(0,0) or ARMA(1,0)? True process: Y t = 1.3 + 0.2 Y t – 1 + e t – 0.1 e t – 1

10
Model selection from more analytical tools Dickey-Fuller Unit-Root test H 0 : The process Y t is difference non-stationary ( Y t is stationary) H a : The process Y t is stationary Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic (ADF): If =1 (difference non-stationary)

11
Fit the model and test H 0 : a = 0 (difference non-stationary) vs. H a : a < 0 (stationary) using the test statistic However, not t-distributed under H 0. Another sampling distributions has been derived and tables (programmed in R)

12
Akaike’s criteria For an ARMA(p,q)-process, let k = p + q + 1 and find the values of the parameters p, q, 1, …, p, 1, …, q of the model that minimizes –2 log{max L(p, q, 1, …, p, 1, …, q )} + 2 k AIC [ Akaike’s Information Criterion]. Works well when the true process have (at least one) infinite order –2 log{max L(p, q, 1, …, p, 1, …, q )} + k log(n) BIC [ (Schwarz) Bayesian Information Criterion]. Works well when we “know” that the true process is a finite-order ARMA(p,q)

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

STAT 497 LECTURE NOTES 2.

STAT 497 LECTURE NOTES 2.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Download ppt on oxidation and reduction Ppt on fmcg sector in india Ppt on chromosomes and genes middle school Ppt on water pollution in the world Ppt on rbi reforms for the completion Seminar ppt on 5 pen pc technology Ppt on good manners for kindergarten Ppt on area of parallelogram and triangles worksheets Ms ppt online Ppt on red and yellow soil