Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJob Copeland Modified over 9 years ago
1
Measuring the impact of EU microfinance – Lessons from the field Karl Dayson and Pål Vik Community Finance Solutions University of Salford June 24, 2010
2
International microfinance impact studies Largest body peer-reviewed literature on microfinance Despite considerable disagreement, convergence around 3 principles 1.Large-scale 2.Longitudinal 3.Experimental or quasi-experimental
3
UK microfinance impact assessment Conducted a microfinance impact assessment of four UK MFIs Large-scale, longitudinal and quasi- experimental Focused on personal and business lending Personal loan clients: two-wave survey, control group and control location Business loan clients: one-off survey and in- depth case studies
4
Generating large sample Allow for complex analysis and inference Survey participants by wave Business clients Personal loan clientsNon-clients Respondents wave 124205173 Respondents wave 2…6281 Problematic getting sufficiently large samples –Small microfinance client base (population) –Small MFIs & sampling frames –Low response rates
5
Achieving scale in EU15 Size of microfinance sector by continent AfricaAsiaEECALACEU-15 Clients9,400,00051,400,0003,000,00012,900,00027,000 MFIs46753538040378 Clients per MFI 20,12896,0757,89532,010346
6
Achieving longitudinal surveys High attrition rates –Inability to establish rapport –Inability to establish contact –Refusal to participate Survey participants by wave MFI1MFI2MFI3Control Total respondents wave 11196224173 Total respondents wave 2 4112 9 81 Differential 785015 92 Attrition rate (%) 66816353
7
Isolating the impact of microfinance Quasi-experimental or experimental For personal loan clients had unique (in the UK) control location For business loan clients in EU15 many challenges conventional control groups –Using non-clients: Low self-employment rates –Using pipeline-clients: Small client base –Randomised studies: impractical and unethical
8
Towards an EU paradigm? International consensus a poor fit? –Small-scale, “noise” in form of govt interventions Implications for MF impact assessments in EU15 –Cross-country studies to achieve scale –Qualitative methods –No perfect fit –Question of audience
9
Thank you! Findings of study to be presented at drinks reception tomorrow eve 6:15- 7:30 at CDFA conference Full report available at www.communityfinance.salford.ac.uk www.communityfinance.salford.ac.uk
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.