Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff."— Presentation transcript:

1 Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff

2 A headhunter discussing Monitoring Organizational Performance for Governing Boards? It’s what we do.

3 Driving Metric: Stakeholder Value Quantitative Qualitative It’s first and foremost about the money, but CEO’s can just as easily lose their jobs over tree trimming.

4 Quantitative: Balancing conflicting forces Price Power Supply Finance Return Customer relations Economic Development Staff Development

5 Price competitiveness Regional National Global

6 Power supply: THE largest component of price Large and vertically integrated Distribution/joint action agency - All requirements - Project

7 Financial condition Debt/equity: Rating agency ratings optimized to minimize interest expense. Life of asset Customers deriving benefit Debt service impact on price Where should the equity reside? - Distribution - Joint action

8 Return Cash transfer to general fund; Payment- in-lieu of taxes Shared service allocation Free services Street paving

9 San Antonio City Public Service (CPS) Annual electric revenue$1.2 Billion Residential Revenue$672 Million Residential Revenue under AEP$882 Million Revenue Saving$210 Million Transfer to the General Fund$245 Million Franchise Fee and Property Tax$57 Million CPS customer residents save annually$398 Million

10 Tacoma Public Utilities Annual Retail Electric Revenue$267 Million Annual Retail Electric Revenue Under Puget Energy$404 Million Retail Revenue Savings$137 Million Gross Revenue Tax$30 Million Support Service Allocation$6 Million Franchise Fee and Property Tax$13 Million Tacoma Public Utility Customers save annually$160 Million

11 Customer Relations Customer satisfaction Reliability; CAIDI/SAIDI Power quality/price Chip manufacturer/irrigator

12 Economic Development Build load and revenue - Load factor - Incremental cost to serve. Mitigate customer dependence Local job creation Tax base

13 Staff Development Turnover Successor development Internal promotions Cost/benefit Safety OSHA Recordable Lost time Unions Grievances Arbitrations

14 Quantitative and Qualitative factors Green resources: College/capital city or coal mining town Subscription rate/premium price Energy efficiency: Community culture: High tech/packing house Staff impact on community relations: Local hires/market compensation forces:

15 Qualitative Factors Relationships/Communication: NO SURPISES Governing body Customers Staff Joint venture partners Community Legislature, administration, and regulatory

16 Questions?


Download ppt "Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google