Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presented by Steve Fall January 15, 2011 SABR Regional Meeting 1.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Presented by Steve Fall January 15, 2011 SABR Regional Meeting 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 Presented by Steve Fall January 15, 2011 SABR Regional Meeting 1

2 What is a True Champion?  A True Champion wins the World Series and has a great regular season 2

3 Does the New Playoff Structure Benefit Teams that are Merely Good, but not Great?  Percentage of clubs with 92 or fewer regular season victories winning WS: Old Format: 25 percent (6 times in 24 postseasons) Current Format: 50 percent (8 of 16) 3

4 Advantages of the Current Playoff Structure  Keeps more teams in the playoff races  Eliminates the possibility of great 100- win teams missing the postseason due to a tough division  More playoff baseball! But it falls short in one area… 4

5 Identifying Dominant Teams  100-Win Teams – in most cases – are Major League’s best and most dominant  Usually only one or two clubs reach this elite level each season  Such regular season dominance should lead to postseason success, but has it? 5

6 First a Look Back  From 1969 through 1993, under the four-team postseason structure, 25 playoff teams won 100 games during the regular season  Eight prevailed as World Series Champions, or 32.0 percent 6

7 But Everything Changed in 1994  The new postseason structure debuted in 1995 with the extra round of playoffs  Since then, dominant regular season teams have faced a tough challenge each October  Under the new format, 20 teams have won 100 games since 1995  Just two prevailed as WS Champs, or 10 percent (1998 and 2009 Yankees) 7

8 Percentage of 100-Win Teams Prevailing as World Champions Old Format: 32.0 percent (8 of 25) Current Format: 10.0 percent (2 of 20)  Adding the 1995 Braves (90-54) boosts the latter figure to 14.3 percent (3 of 21)  Still considerably lower than the previous percentage 8

9 How Can This Happen?  Even if a dramatically superior team defeats an inferior club 65 percent of the time in a playoff series, the new PS is no cakewalk .65 x.65 x.65 = 27.5 percent  So their odds of winning it all are just over one in four despite having a decisive edge in all three confrontations  And teams are almost never dramatically superior in all three rounds 9

10 What about Projected or Pythagorean Records?  Run differential and the Pythagorean Theorem of Winning Percentage do a better job of identifying elite teams than regular winning percentage  Does this change the results? 10

11 Percentage of Projected 100-Win Teams Prevailing as WS Champs Old Format: 27.3 percent (9 of 33) Current Format: 15.8 percent (3 of 19)  The three teams with a 100-win projected record to prevail: 1998 Yankees, 2002 Angels and 2007 Red Sox  Though not as extreme a difference, we get similar results as when using actual won-lost records 11

12 Comparing Teams with the Best Record Each Postseason  How have the teams with the best won- lost record fared in the postseason?  This method works well in seasons with multiple 100-win teams (such as expansion seasons like 1998) 12

13 Percentage of Teams with the Best RS Record Prevailing as WS Champions Old Format: 29.2 percent (7 of 24) Current Format: 15.8 percent (3 of 19)* * Teams shared the best record in three different postseasons  The three teams with the best RS record that prevailed were the 1998 Yankees, 2007 Red Sox and 2009 Yankees  The results follow the previous methods 13

14 The Plight of the Atlanta Braves  From 1995 through 2005, the Braves won 11 straight Division Titles, won 100+ games 5 times and averaged 98.1 wins  Yet they won only 1 World Series  Went 48-44 in PS games  Went 10-10 in PS series  A.500 record in PS series projects to win 1 in 8 times now vs. 1 in 4 before 14

15 Summary of Research  In the expanded postseason, dominant regular season teams have won the World Series roughly half as often as before (from 1969-93)  Is the new format solely to blame? 15

16 Other Possible Theories 1) Finishing Strong 2) The Secret Sauce 3) Super Divisions 4) Flipping the Switch 5) A Drop in Quality 16

17 Finishing Strong  Some teams – often fortified by deadline trades – can be better than 100-win teams without having as good a record  For example, the 92-70 Giants and 90- 72 Rangers from 2010  Both strengthened their clubs at the trade deadline and thereafter 17

18 The Secret Sauce  Baseball Prospectus has developed a formula that summarizes the team attributes that enhance the odds of postseason success  Are some teams built for the postseason?  In general, teams with top heavy rotations tend to fare well  The ability to generate offense without power also appears key 18

19 The Super Division  AL East teams in recent seasons face such fierce competition all season that they are much better clubs than their records indicate  For example, the 2007 Red Sox had a 96-66 record but steamrolled PS competition 19

20 Flipping the Switch  Some great teams may sleepwalk through the regular season and win just enough to reach playoffs  The 2000 Yankees went just 87-74 and won the World Series  Had winning in 1998 and 1999 made them complacent?  If so, this impacts their regular season record 20

21 A Drop in Quality  Perhaps 100-win teams just aren’t as good  Has division realignment and/or expansion made it easier to win 100 regular season games since 1995?  The number of 100-win teams has increased under the new format: 1.31 per postseason versus 1.13 under the old structure 21

22 Postseason Record of 100- Win Regular Season Teams SeasonsWonLostPct. 1969-199311386.568 1995-201010388.539 22

23 Postseason Record of Teams with the Best Regular Season Record SeasonsWonLostPct. 1969-199311286.566 1995-201010383.554 23

24 Conclusion  While other factors have had some impact on the results, the most successful regular season teams have a much tougher time prevailing as World Series Champions due to the extra round of playoffs they must survive 24

Download ppt "Presented by Steve Fall January 15, 2011 SABR Regional Meeting 1."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google