Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published bySteve Hollen Modified over 2 years ago

1
A REVIEW OF WHISTLER TURBULENCE BY THREE- DIMENSIONAL PIC SIMULATIONS A REVIEW OF WHISTLER TURBULENCE BY THREE- DIMENSIONAL PIC SIMULATIONS S. Peter Gary, Space Science Institute Ouliang Chang, Oracle Corporation R. Scott Hughes and Joseph Wang University of Southern California Queenstown, New Zealand 9 February 2015

2
A Viewpoint for Short- Wavelength Turbulence n Short-wavelength turbulence is fundamentally nonlinear and must be treated with fully nonlinear techniques such as particle-in-cell simulations. n At short wavelengths, fluctuation amplitudes are relatively weak (| B| << B o ). So linear kinetic wave theory can be useful in describing some aspects of such turbulence.

3
Short Wavelength Turbulence in the Solar Wind: Sahraoui et al. (2010) n Cascade of long wavelengths to dissipation at short wavelengths. n Inertial range: 10 -4 Hz < f < 0.5 Hz n Kinetic range (aka “Dissipation range”): 0.5 Hz < f < 100’s Hz n Kinetic Alfven waves 0.5 Hz < f < 10 Hz n KAWs or whistlers? 10 Hz < f

4
Scenario for Short-Wavelength Turbulence Shaikh & Zank, MNRAS, 400,1881 (2009)

5
T hree-Dimensional Whistler Particle-in-cell (PIC) Simulations n Buneman particle-in-cell 3D EMPIC code. n Homogeneous magnetized electron-ion plasma. n Initial conditions: Turbulence: Almost isotropic spectrum of whistler fluctuations at kc/ω pe < 1. Instability: T/T ||e > 1 leads to whistler anisotropy instability. Instability: T e /T ||e > 1 leads to whistler anisotropy instability.

6
3D PIC Simulations of Whistler Turbulence n Chang et al. (2011), Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L22102. n Gary et al. (2012), Astrophys. J., 755, 142 (Variations with initial wave amplitude). n Chang et al. (2013), J. Geophys. Res., 118, 2824 (Variations with β e ). n Chang et al. (2014), Phys. Plasmas, 21, 052305 (Linear vs. nonlinear dissipation). n Gary et al. (2014), J. Geophys. Res., 119, 1429 (Whistler anisotropy instability). n Hughes et al. (2014), Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8681 (Electron and ion heating). n Chang et al. (2015), Astrophys. J., in press (Inverse vs. forward cascade)

7
3D PIC Simulations of Whistler Turbulence: Forward vs. Inverse Cascades n Run 2: Large-box simulation n Initial spectrum: 0.24 < kc/ω pe < 0.49 n Fluctuation energy in forward cascade ~ 80 times greater than energy in inverse cascade. n So from here on, we emphasize forward cascade results.

8
3D PIC Simulations of Whistler Turbulence: Forward Cascade n Magnetic fluctuations show: Whistler-like dispersion Decay of energy * Likely cause: wave-particle interactions (Electron Landau damping) Forward cascade to larger wavenumbers and k >> k || * Likely cause: Wave-wave interactions Spectral break at k c/ω pe ~ 1 * Likely causes: Dispersion + dissipation

9
3D Whistler Turbulence: Satisfies Linear Whistler Dispersion n Colors: Dispersion from PIC simulations. n Black lines: Dispersion from linear kinetic dispersion theory.

10
2D Whistler Turbulence: Magnetic Fluctuation Ratios n Saito et al. [2008] n Circles: 2D PIC simulation of whistler turbulence. n Dashed lines: Linear kinetic dispersion theory n Red: |B || | 2 /|B| 2 n Red: | B || | 2 /| B| 2 n Blue: |B| 2 /|B| 2 n Blue: | B | 2 /| B| 2 n Green: |B| 2 /|B| 2 n Green: | B | 2 /| B| 2

11
3D Whistler Turbulence: Dissipation Rate Increases with Increasing β e 3D Whistler Turbulence: Dissipation Rate Increases with Increasing β e

12
3D Whistler Turbulence: Wavevector Anisotropy Decreases with β e 3D Whistler Turbulence: Wavevector Anisotropy Decreases with β e

13
3D Whistler Turbulence: Spectral Break 3D Whistler Turbulence: Spectral Break n PIC s i mulations at β e =0.1 [Gary et al., 2012] have spectral break at k c/ω pe ~1. n But no “universal” power-law scaling; rather, slopes become less steep as initial amplitude is increased.

14
Turbulent Dissipation n Forward cascade of turbulence carries fluctuating field energy to dissipation at short wavelengths. Possible mechanisms: Linear wave-particle interactions: * Landau damping. * Cyclotron damping. Nonlinear Landau damping.Nonlinear Landau damping. Nonlinear reconnection at small-scale current sheets. Nonlinear nonresonant stochastic heating.

15
3D Whistler Turbulence: Electron Heating n Electron heating rate increases with increasing β e. n Forward cascade yields k >> k ||, yielding δE ||, yielding electron heating with T ||e > T n Forward cascade yields k >> k ||, yielding δE ||, yielding electron heating with T ||e > T e.

16
3D Whistler Turbulence: Linear Damping vs. Total Dissipation 3D Whistler Turbulence: Linear Damping vs. Total Dissipation n Total damping rates: solid lines. n Linear theory damping rates: dashed lines. n Agreement at high β e and low initial fluctuation amplitudes (ε e ). n Chang et al. (2014)

17
3D Whistler Turbulence: Scaling with Simulation Box Size n Lω pe /c = 25.6 (black lines) n Lω pe /c = 51.2 (blue lines) n Lω pe /c = 102.4 (red lines)

18
Whistler Anisotropy Instability: Particle-in-cell Simulation n 3D PIC simulation in homogeneous plasma [Gary, Hughes et al., 2014]. n Fluctuating fields driven by the instability grow, saturate, then gradually decay. n Wave-particle scattering reduces electron anisotropy, but does not yield full isotropy.

19
3D Whistler Turbulence: Satisfies Linear Whistler Dispersion n Turbulence from initial whistler fluctuations: Dashed line: Linear dispersion theory. n Turbulence from whistler anisotropy instability: Dashed line: Linear dispersion theory.

20
Whistler Anisotropy Instability: Spectral Evolution Early times: Short-wavelength whistler instability grows at kc/ω pe ~ 1 with k << k || Later times: Inverse cascade to long wavelengths and k >> k || Forward cascade to very short wavelengths and k << k ||. But instability-driven spectra do not show power-law behavior characteristic of turbulent cascade.

21
Whistler Anisotropy Instability: Anisotropy Upper Bound n Instability constrains value of T/T ||e. n Instability constrains value of T e /T ||e. n PIC simulation [Gary & Wang, 1996]: n Magnetosheath observations [Gary et al., 2005]:

22
3D PIC Simulations of Whistler Turbulence Cascades: Conclusions n Forward cascade 80 x faster than inverse cascade. n Forward cascade yields k >> k || wavevector anisotropy. n Two distinct power-law spectra with break at k c/ω pe ~1. n At weak amplitudes fluctuations Satisfy linear theory dispersion. Heat electrons by Landau damping with T ||e > T Heat electrons by Landau damping with T ||e > T e. T ||i < T Heat ions by Landau damping with T ||i < T i.

23
Conclusions: Whistler Turbulence Scaling Relations n Increasing β e yields Faster forward cascade rates. Less anisotropic magnetic spectra. Less anisotropic electron velocity distributions. Hotter electron velocity distributions. n Increasing simulation box size yields Weaker overall dissipation. Stronger ion heating. Weaker electron heating.

Similar presentations

OK

The turbulent cascade in the solar wind Luca Sorriso-Valvo LICRYL – IPCF/CNR, Rende, Italy R. Marino, V. Carbone, R. Bruno, P. Veltri,

The turbulent cascade in the solar wind Luca Sorriso-Valvo LICRYL – IPCF/CNR, Rende, Italy R. Marino, V. Carbone, R. Bruno, P. Veltri,

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on linked list in java Ppt on javascript events click Ppt on you can win pdf Ppt on layer 3 switching configuration Download ppt on power steering Ppt on thermal power plant Ppt on our changing earth for class 7 Ppt on endangered and endemic species in india Ppt on council of ministers government Ppt on interest rate futures