Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published bySteve Hollen Modified over 2 years ago

1
A REVIEW OF WHISTLER TURBULENCE BY THREE- DIMENSIONAL PIC SIMULATIONS A REVIEW OF WHISTLER TURBULENCE BY THREE- DIMENSIONAL PIC SIMULATIONS S. Peter Gary, Space Science Institute Ouliang Chang, Oracle Corporation R. Scott Hughes and Joseph Wang University of Southern California Queenstown, New Zealand 9 February 2015

2
A Viewpoint for Short- Wavelength Turbulence n Short-wavelength turbulence is fundamentally nonlinear and must be treated with fully nonlinear techniques such as particle-in-cell simulations. n At short wavelengths, fluctuation amplitudes are relatively weak (| B| << B o ). So linear kinetic wave theory can be useful in describing some aspects of such turbulence.

3
Short Wavelength Turbulence in the Solar Wind: Sahraoui et al. (2010) n Cascade of long wavelengths to dissipation at short wavelengths. n Inertial range: 10 -4 Hz < f < 0.5 Hz n Kinetic range (aka “Dissipation range”): 0.5 Hz < f < 100’s Hz n Kinetic Alfven waves 0.5 Hz < f < 10 Hz n KAWs or whistlers? 10 Hz < f

4
Scenario for Short-Wavelength Turbulence Shaikh & Zank, MNRAS, 400,1881 (2009)

5
T hree-Dimensional Whistler Particle-in-cell (PIC) Simulations n Buneman particle-in-cell 3D EMPIC code. n Homogeneous magnetized electron-ion plasma. n Initial conditions: Turbulence: Almost isotropic spectrum of whistler fluctuations at kc/ω pe < 1. Instability: T/T ||e > 1 leads to whistler anisotropy instability. Instability: T e /T ||e > 1 leads to whistler anisotropy instability.

6
3D PIC Simulations of Whistler Turbulence n Chang et al. (2011), Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L22102. n Gary et al. (2012), Astrophys. J., 755, 142 (Variations with initial wave amplitude). n Chang et al. (2013), J. Geophys. Res., 118, 2824 (Variations with β e ). n Chang et al. (2014), Phys. Plasmas, 21, 052305 (Linear vs. nonlinear dissipation). n Gary et al. (2014), J. Geophys. Res., 119, 1429 (Whistler anisotropy instability). n Hughes et al. (2014), Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8681 (Electron and ion heating). n Chang et al. (2015), Astrophys. J., in press (Inverse vs. forward cascade)

7
3D PIC Simulations of Whistler Turbulence: Forward vs. Inverse Cascades n Run 2: Large-box simulation n Initial spectrum: 0.24 < kc/ω pe < 0.49 n Fluctuation energy in forward cascade ~ 80 times greater than energy in inverse cascade. n So from here on, we emphasize forward cascade results.

8
3D PIC Simulations of Whistler Turbulence: Forward Cascade n Magnetic fluctuations show: Whistler-like dispersion Decay of energy * Likely cause: wave-particle interactions (Electron Landau damping) Forward cascade to larger wavenumbers and k >> k || * Likely cause: Wave-wave interactions Spectral break at k c/ω pe ~ 1 * Likely causes: Dispersion + dissipation

9
3D Whistler Turbulence: Satisfies Linear Whistler Dispersion n Colors: Dispersion from PIC simulations. n Black lines: Dispersion from linear kinetic dispersion theory.

10
2D Whistler Turbulence: Magnetic Fluctuation Ratios n Saito et al. [2008] n Circles: 2D PIC simulation of whistler turbulence. n Dashed lines: Linear kinetic dispersion theory n Red: |B || | 2 /|B| 2 n Red: | B || | 2 /| B| 2 n Blue: |B| 2 /|B| 2 n Blue: | B | 2 /| B| 2 n Green: |B| 2 /|B| 2 n Green: | B | 2 /| B| 2

11
3D Whistler Turbulence: Dissipation Rate Increases with Increasing β e 3D Whistler Turbulence: Dissipation Rate Increases with Increasing β e

12
3D Whistler Turbulence: Wavevector Anisotropy Decreases with β e 3D Whistler Turbulence: Wavevector Anisotropy Decreases with β e

13
3D Whistler Turbulence: Spectral Break 3D Whistler Turbulence: Spectral Break n PIC s i mulations at β e =0.1 [Gary et al., 2012] have spectral break at k c/ω pe ~1. n But no “universal” power-law scaling; rather, slopes become less steep as initial amplitude is increased.

14
Turbulent Dissipation n Forward cascade of turbulence carries fluctuating field energy to dissipation at short wavelengths. Possible mechanisms: Linear wave-particle interactions: * Landau damping. * Cyclotron damping. Nonlinear Landau damping.Nonlinear Landau damping. Nonlinear reconnection at small-scale current sheets. Nonlinear nonresonant stochastic heating.

15
3D Whistler Turbulence: Electron Heating n Electron heating rate increases with increasing β e. n Forward cascade yields k >> k ||, yielding δE ||, yielding electron heating with T ||e > T n Forward cascade yields k >> k ||, yielding δE ||, yielding electron heating with T ||e > T e.

16
3D Whistler Turbulence: Linear Damping vs. Total Dissipation 3D Whistler Turbulence: Linear Damping vs. Total Dissipation n Total damping rates: solid lines. n Linear theory damping rates: dashed lines. n Agreement at high β e and low initial fluctuation amplitudes (ε e ). n Chang et al. (2014)

17
3D Whistler Turbulence: Scaling with Simulation Box Size n Lω pe /c = 25.6 (black lines) n Lω pe /c = 51.2 (blue lines) n Lω pe /c = 102.4 (red lines)

18
Whistler Anisotropy Instability: Particle-in-cell Simulation n 3D PIC simulation in homogeneous plasma [Gary, Hughes et al., 2014]. n Fluctuating fields driven by the instability grow, saturate, then gradually decay. n Wave-particle scattering reduces electron anisotropy, but does not yield full isotropy.

19
3D Whistler Turbulence: Satisfies Linear Whistler Dispersion n Turbulence from initial whistler fluctuations: Dashed line: Linear dispersion theory. n Turbulence from whistler anisotropy instability: Dashed line: Linear dispersion theory.

20
Whistler Anisotropy Instability: Spectral Evolution Early times: Short-wavelength whistler instability grows at kc/ω pe ~ 1 with k << k || Later times: Inverse cascade to long wavelengths and k >> k || Forward cascade to very short wavelengths and k << k ||. But instability-driven spectra do not show power-law behavior characteristic of turbulent cascade.

21
Whistler Anisotropy Instability: Anisotropy Upper Bound n Instability constrains value of T/T ||e. n Instability constrains value of T e /T ||e. n PIC simulation [Gary & Wang, 1996]: n Magnetosheath observations [Gary et al., 2005]:

22
3D PIC Simulations of Whistler Turbulence Cascades: Conclusions n Forward cascade 80 x faster than inverse cascade. n Forward cascade yields k >> k || wavevector anisotropy. n Two distinct power-law spectra with break at k c/ω pe ~1. n At weak amplitudes fluctuations Satisfy linear theory dispersion. Heat electrons by Landau damping with T ||e > T Heat electrons by Landau damping with T ||e > T e. T ||i < T Heat ions by Landau damping with T ||i < T i.

23
Conclusions: Whistler Turbulence Scaling Relations n Increasing β e yields Faster forward cascade rates. Less anisotropic magnetic spectra. Less anisotropic electron velocity distributions. Hotter electron velocity distributions. n Increasing simulation box size yields Weaker overall dissipation. Stronger ion heating. Weaker electron heating.

Similar presentations

OK

Simulations of turbulent plasma heating by powerful electron beams Timofeev I.V., Terekhov A.V.

Simulations of turbulent plasma heating by powerful electron beams Timofeev I.V., Terekhov A.V.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on linked list in java Ppt on javascript events click Ppt on you can win pdf Ppt on layer 3 switching configuration Download ppt on power steering Ppt on thermal power plant Ppt on our changing earth for class 7 Ppt on endangered and endemic species in india Ppt on council of ministers government Ppt on interest rate futures