Presentation on theme: "SOLAR WIND TURBULENCE; WAVE DISSIPATION AT ELECTRON SCALE WAVELENGTHS S. Peter Gary Space Science Institute Boulder, CO Meeting on Solar Wind Turbulence."— Presentation transcript:
SOLAR WIND TURBULENCE; WAVE DISSIPATION AT ELECTRON SCALE WAVELENGTHS S. Peter Gary Space Science Institute Boulder, CO Meeting on Solar Wind Turbulence Kennebunkport, ME 4-7 June 2013
Magnetic Turbulence in the Solar Wind: Sahraoui et al., PRL (2010) n Solar wind observations from two Cluster magnetometers: FGM (f < 33 Hz) (blue curve) STAFF-SC (1.5 < f <225 Hz) (green curve) n Four regimes: Inertial with ~f -5/3 “Transition range” with ~f -4 “Dispersion range” with ~ f -2.5 Electron “Dissipation range” with ~f -4
Magnetic Turbulence in the Solar Wind: Narita et al., GRL (2011) n Solar wind observations from four Cluster spacecraft. n Fluctuations observed at both ω Ω p in solar wind frame. n Most observations at k n Most observations at k B o.
Magnetic Turbulence in the Solar Wind: Sahraoui et al., PRL (2010) n Solar wind observations from four Cluster spacecraft. n Fluctuations only at ω<< Ω p in solar wind frame. n Most observations at k n Most observations at k B o (θ kB ≈ 90 o ).
Turbulence: Kolmogorov Scenario n Turbulent energy is injected at very long wavelengths and then cascades down toward short wavelengths along the “inertial range.” n At sufficiently short wavelengths, there is transfer of energy in the “dissipation range” where fluctuations are damped and the medium is heated.
But Plasmas Are Different… n In neutral fluids, the Kolmogorov picture seems to work well; there are few normal modes and collisions provide resistive and/or viscous dissipation. n But in magnetized collisionless plasmas, there are many normal modes and several different dissipation mechanisms.
A Hypothesis for Short- Wavelength Plasma Turbulence n The energy cascade from long to short wavelengths in plasmas remains a fundamentally nonlinear problem. n But at short wavelengths (f > 0.5 Hz in the solar wind near Earth), fluctuation amplitudes are relatively weak (| B| 0.5 Hz in the solar wind near Earth), fluctuation amplitudes are relatively weak (| B| << B o ). n So we hypothesize that we can use linear theory to treat wave dispersion and wave-particle dissipation, and then use this theory to explain and interpret the results from fully nonlinear simulations. n Fundamental assumption: Homogeneous turbulence with constant background magnetic field and uniform plasma parameters.
An Alternate Hypothesis for Plasma Turbulence Dissipation n The energy cascade from long to short wavelengths causes small-scale current sheets to form; these localized current sheets are the sites of strong dissipation. n Minping Wan has an invited talk on this topic later today. n My concern will be linear dispersion and quasilinear wave-particle dissipation in plasma turbulence.
Which Modes are Important? n Observations indicate that non-ideal physics in solar wind turbulence begins at 1 ~ k c/ω pp n And that most fluctuations propagate at k k B o. n n Linear theory predicts that the two modes most likely to satisfy these conditions are Kinetic Alfven waves and Magnetosonic-whistler modes.
Short-Wavelength Turbulence in the Solar Wind: Two Basic Modes n Kinetic Alfven waves ω < Ω p 1 < k c/ω pp < few ω ≅ k || v A n Magnetosonic-whistler waves Ω p < ω < Ω e (m e /m p ) 1/2 < k c/ω pe < few ω/Ω e ~ kc/ω pp + kk || c 2 /ω pe 2
Kinetic Alfven Wave Turbulence: Gyrokinetic Simulations n Gyrokinetic simulations use codes in which the particle velocities are averaged over a gyroperiod. n Such codes are appropriate to model kinetic Alfven waves (KAWs) which propagate at ω < Ω p. n Howes et al. [2008, 2011], TenBarge and Howes  and TenBarge et al.  report detailed simulation studies of KAW turbulence.
Whistler turbulence: Particle-in-cell Simulations n Particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations treat the full three-dimensional velocity space properties of both electrons and ions. n Such codes are appropriate to model whistler turbulence, which involve the full cyclotron motion of the electrons. n PIC simulations require greater computational resources than gyrokinetic simulations, so whistler turbulence computations use smaller size boxes and run for shorter times than KAW simulations. n Saito et al. [2008, 2010] and Saito and Gary  have done 2D PIC simulations of whistler turbulence, while Chang et al. [2011; 2013] and Gary et al.  have carried out fully 3D whistler turbulence PIC simulations. n Svidzinsky et al.  carried out 2D PIC simulations of magnetosonic-whistler turbulence.
Magnetic Turbulence Simulation Spectra: Wavenumber Dependence Kinetic Alfven turbulence Howes et al.  KAWs strongly Spectral break at kρ e ~1 Whistler turbulence n Chang et al.  n β e = 0.10, T e /T p =1 n Spectral break at kc/ω pe ~1
Magnetic Turbulence Simulation Spectra: Wavevector Anisotropy Kinetic Alfven turbulence Howes et al.  k >> k || Whistler turbulence n Chang et al. [2013a] n k >> k ||
Magnetic Turbulence Simulations: Dispersion Kinetic Alfven turbulence Howes et al.  Whistler turbulence n Chang et al. [2013a]
Magnetic Turbulence Simulations: Dissipation Kinetic Alfven turbulence n Howes et al.  n Primary heating via Landau resonance. n Only electrons heated at short wavelengths. Whistler turbulence n Chang et al. [2013a] n Primary heating via Landau resonance. n Only electrons heated. n T < T ||
Simulation Summaries n Gyrokinetic simulations of KAW and PIC simulations of whistler turbulence both yield: Forward cascade. k >> k || k >> k || Spectral breaks at electron scales (but different scalings) Consistency with linear dispersion theory. Parallel electron heating via Landau resonance.
Which Modes are More Important? n KAW School: Kinetic Alfven turbulence does it all, cascading turbulent energy from the inertial range down to electron dissipation. n Magnetosonic-whistler School: Magnetosonic turbulence weaker than Alfvenic turbulence at inertial range, but nevertheless cascades down to short wavelengths where whistlers dominate and heat electrons.
Shaikh & Zank, MNRAS, 400,1881 (2009)
Questions in the Homogeneous Turbulence Scenario n Are KAWs alone sufficient to describe short-wavelength turbulence in the solar wind, or do magnetosonic-whistler modes contribute? n Can Landau damping from either type of turbulence describe solar wind electron heating?
Beyond Homogeneous Turbulence: Karimabadi et al.  n Very large PIC simulations at β=0.1 with fluid-like instabilities cascading down to electron scales. n Panel (a): At ion gyroscales, turbulence exhibits both Alfven (A) modes and magnetosonic (M) waves. n Panel (b): Magnetic Compressibility. C || (A) ~ 0 and C || (M) ~ 1.
Beyond Homogeneous Turbulence: Karimabadi et al.  n Electrons are preferentially heated in the directions parallel and anti-parallel to the background magnetic field. n Parallel electron heating is consistent with both Landau damping of waves and E || generated by reconnection. n Analytic estimate: Current sheet heating ~100 times larger than that due to Kinetic Alfven wave heating.
Beyond Homogeneous Turbulence: TenBarge and Howes  n Gyrokinetic simulations at β i =1 form small-scale current sheets. n Black solid line: simulated electron heating. n Blue dashed line: Predicted electron heating by Landau damping. n Red dashed line: Electron heating predicted by collisional resistivity. n Landau damping sufficient to account for electron heating in simulation.
Beyond Homogeneous Turbulence: Chang et al. [2013b] n Small box 3D PIC simulations of whistler turbulence. n Electron-scale current sheets form. n At β e <<1, linear damping (dashed) << total dissipation (solid). n At β e =1, linear damping (dashed) ~ total dissipation (solid).
Conclusions: Electron Dissipation n Linear electron damping/Total electron dissipation depends upon: Kinetic Alfven waves vs. Whistler modes Value of β e Size of simulation box n More simulations needed to quantify the dissipation mechanisms.