Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byRamon Percival Modified over 2 years ago

1
Gauged Supergravities in Different Frames Dr. Mario Trigiante (Politecnico di Torino) F.Cordaro, P.Frè, L.Gualtieri, P.Termonia, M.T. 9804056 Wit, Samtleben, M.T. 0311224 Wit, Samtleben, M.T. 0311224 ; Dall’Agata, Inverso, M.T. 1209.0760

2
Plan of the Talk Overview and Motivations: Gauged Supergravity and string/M-theory compactifications. Embedding tensor formulation of D=4 gauged SUGRAs and duality Conclusions Relevance of symplectic frames: New N=8 SUGRAs with SO(8) local symmetry

3
Introduction D=4 Supergravity from Superstring/M-theory: Superstring M-theory M 1,3 x M Ricci flat Flux = 0 D=4 ungauged Supergravity Global symmetries DualitiesMinimal coupl. mass. def. V( ) D=4 gauged Supergravity M 1,3 x M Flux 0 Embedding tensor Mass deformations: spontaneous SUSY breaking Scalar potential: moduli stabilization in Minkoswki, dS or AdS vacua

4
Ungauged (extended) Supergravities Electric-magnetic duality symmetry of Maxwell equations now must also involve the scalar fields (Gaillard-Zumino) G = Isom( M scal ) Non-linear action on Linear action FF GG g¢g¢ FF GG Sp(2 n v, R) E/M duality promotes G to global sym. of f.eqs. E B. ids. g = 2 G AB CD Smaller symmetry of the action: Scalar fields (described by a non-lin. Sigma-model) are non- minimally coupled to the vector ones

5
The Issue of Symplectic Frames Different symplectic frames (SF) may yield inequivalent actions with different global symmetry groups G e but same physics In the SUGRA description of string/M-theory compactifications, SF fixed by the resulting scalar-vector couplings Symplectic FrameCoupling of scalar fields to vectors is fixed up to a symplectic transfomation on F and G (Symplectic Frame)

6
Parity as an anti-Symplectic Duality Split total scalars so that: isometry is an invariance of the theory is realized on the vector fields and their magnetic duals by an anti-symplectic duality transformation Distinction between the scalar/pseudo-scalar fields depends on the choice of the symplectic frame

7
Gauging Gauging consists in promoting a group G ½ G e ½ G from global to local symmetry of the action. Different SF ) different choices for G. Local invariance w.r.t. G Description of gauging which is independent of the SF: E symplectic 2n v x 2n v matrix All information about the gauging encoded in a G-tensor: the embedding tensor [Cordaro, Frè, Gualtieri, Termonia, M.T. 9804056; Nicolai, Samtleben 0010076; de Wit, Samtleben, M.T. 0311224 ]

8
Restore SUSY of the action: Mass terms: Scalar potential: Fermion shifts: Closure: Locality Linear : String/M-theory origin: [D’Auria, Gargiulo, Ferrara, M.T., Vaulà 0303049; Angelantonj, Ferrara, M.T. 0306185; de Wit, Samtleben, M.T. 0311224…] Manifestly G-covariant formulation de Wit, Samtleben, M.T. 0507289 Emb. tensor from E 11 and tensor hiearachies [de Wit, Samtleben 0501243; Riccioni, West 0705.0752; de Wit, Nicolai, Samtleben, 0801.1294]

9
N=8, D=4 SUGRA Scalar fields in non-linear -model with target space (1) g A (28) A AB ABC ABCD gravitational A,B 2 8 of SU(8) R M scal = = 32 supercharges

10
Linear constraints Quad. constraints Looking for SO(8): First gauging: [de Wit, Nicolai ’82] Original dWN gauging Hull’s CSO(p,q,r)-gaugings Same groups gauged by the magnetic vectors Gaugings defined by

11
Take generic Quadratic constraints Gauge connection: Choice corresponds to an SO(8)-gauging in a different SF in which A’ IJ are electric Features of E: it centralizes so(8) in Sp(56) and is NOT in E 7(7) for generic angle: but not in SU(28) for generic

12
analogue of de Roo-Wagemann’s angle in N=4, N=2: parametrizes inequivalent theories. Vacua of original dWN theory =0 studied by Warner and recently by Fischbacher (found several critical points, not complete yet) Studied vacua with a G 2 residual symmetry: suffices to restrict to G 2 singlets Scalar potential: whereand de Wit, Samtleben, M.T. 0705.2101

13
Dall’Agata, Inverso, M.T. 1209.0760 Borghese, Guarino, Roest, 1209.3003

14
Discrete symmetries of V eff : (Parity) (SO(8) Triality) originate from non trivial symmetries of the whole theory does not affect action terms up to second order in the fluctuations about the N=8 vacuum (mass spectrum). Possible relation to compactifiation of D=11 SUGRA on with torsion ( ) (ABJ) [Aharony, Bergman, Jafferis, 0807.4924] Inequivalent theories only for

15
Conclusions Showed in a given example how initial choice of SF determines, after gauging, physical properties of the model Study vacua of the new family of SO(8)-gauged maximal SUGRAS RG flow from new N=0 G 2 vacuum to N=8 SO(8) one (both stable AdS 4 )

Similar presentations

OK

Cosmic challenges for fundamental physics Diederik Roest December 9, 2009 Symposium “The Quantum Universe”

Cosmic challenges for fundamental physics Diederik Roest December 9, 2009 Symposium “The Quantum Universe”

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google