Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Published byNasir Ruth Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT."— Presentation transcript:

1 ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT

2 What is Evident? 2 Work is Needed – Overall Scores are Below DFG and State Scores Some Positive Signs There are Achievement Gaps Among Subgroups and Schools There are Subgroups with High Non-Proficiency Rates and Specific Schools are Impacted More Than the Others That do not Have Enough Students in Those Subgroups to Count Toward Testing Data Some Schools are Significantly Above the DFG and State Averages

3 Where Can This Information be Viewed? 3 District Website - www.hamilton.k12.nj.us www.hamilton.k12.nj.us Curriculum Tab District Testing Information Link to the Annual Report of Student Assessment Data The Report Shows Percentage Proficient by Test Given, Subject, School, Grade, Subgroup Scores are Compared to DFG and State

4 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS PERCENT OF TOTAL STUDENTS AT PROFICIENT/ADVANCED PROFICIENT IN MOST RECENT ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 GRADES 3 - 8 4

5 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 3 5

6 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 4 6

7 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 5 7

8 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 6 8

9 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 7 9

10 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 8 10

11 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT PERCENT OF TOTAL STUDENTS AT PROFICIENT/ADVANCED PROFICIENT IN MOST RECENT ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 GRADES 3 - 8 11

12 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 3 12

13 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 4 13

14 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 5 14

15 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 6 15

16 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 7 16

17 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS GRADE 8 17

18 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS PERCENT OF TOTAL STUDENTS AT PROFICIENT/ADVANCED PROFICIENT IN MOST RECENT ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 Grades 4 and 8 18

19 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS GRADE 4 19

20 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS GRADE 8 20

21 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL HSPA LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY ASSESSEMENTS ASSESSMENTS AFTER THE FIRST TEST ADMINISTRATION 21

22 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL HSPA MATHEMATICS ASSESSEMENTS ASSESSMENTS AFTER THE FIRST TEST ADMINISTRATION 22

23 % Passing 2010 % Passing 2011 % Passing 2012 Mathematics – Total Population Hamilton Township76.9%77.8%74.7% Language Arts/Literacy – Total Population Hamilton Township87.8%89.9%91.3% HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOLS 2012 ANNUAL REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA Percentage Passing after Third Attempt on High School Proficiency Assessment 23

24 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SAT REASONING TEST CRITICAL READING MATHEMATICSWRITING HAMILTON TOWNSHIP2010483491473 2011472482465 2012478484473 STATE2010495514497 2011495516497 2012495517499 NATION2010501516492 2011497514489 2012496514488 24

25 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP AMERICAN COLLEGE TESTING (ACT) 25 ENGLISHMATHEMATICSREADINGSCIENCECOMPOSITE HAMILTON TOWNSHIP201021.721.822.021.521.9 201120.321.220.720.520.8 201220.621.421.720.821.2 STATE201023.123.623.222.423.2 201123.123.723.322.423.2 201223.123.923.422.623.4 NATION201020.521.021.320.921.0 201120.621.121.320.921.1 201220.521.121.320.921.1

26 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ADVANCED PLACEMENT TESTS 2009-20102010-20112011-2012 Hamilton Township # 392 % 3-5 54.3 # 417 % 3-5 59.7 # 430 % 3-5 61.9 A score of 3 to 5 is Considered Passing and May be Considered for College Credit 26

27 What Now? 27 Con tinue with the Recommended Improvement Plans (DINI, Task Force, CAP from CAPA Review, & the HTSD AIM Initiative) Understand NJDOE Accountability and Growth Models Align with CCC Standards, Update Curriculum Materials, Monitor the Instruction, and Ensure Constructivist Teaching is Occurring Implement New Evaluation Systems (BOE & RTTT3 Funding) Continue Infusing Targeted Assistance Foundations Program (BOE & RTTT3 Funding) Developmental K, Transitional First Grade, & New Title I Teachers (Title I Funding) Monitor Effectiveness of Data Coaches and Basic Skills Instruction Applied for RTTTD Federal Grant for Expanded Programming

Download ppt "ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT."

Similar presentations

Mt. Diablo Unified School District

Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.

ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
1 The Ewing Public Schools 2011-12 Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.

1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) Reading and Mathematics 2012 Carolyn Wood, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and.

Maryland School Assessment (MSA) Reading and Mathematics 2012 Carolyn Wood, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and.
North Mason School District September 2, 2010. ◦ District 4 th and 5 th grade Reading scores are above statewide scores. ◦ District 4 th grade Writing.

North Mason School District September 2, ◦ District 4 th and 5 th grade Reading scores are above statewide scores. ◦ District 4 th grade Writing.
Watertown Public Schools Assessment Report 2009 Ann Koufman-Frederick & WPS Administrative Council School Committee Meeting December 7, 2009 Part I MCAS,

Watertown Public Schools Assessment Report 2009 Ann Koufman-Frederick & WPS Administrative Council School Committee Meeting December 7, 2009 Part I MCAS,
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2012 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.

Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2012 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.

Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
Measures of Student Achievement Appoquinimink School District November 2007.

Measures of Student Achievement Appoquinimink School District November 2007.
New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Recommendations for Change June 1, 2011.

New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Recommendations for Change June 1, 2011.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.

A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting

Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?

Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
ANNUAL 2013 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.

ANNUAL 2013 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments 2010-2011.

Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments
Fresno Systemic Program National Science Foundation USP Mid-point Review and Accomplishments February 10, 2003 Fresno Schools – Making A+ Difference For.

Fresno Systemic Program National Science Foundation USP Mid-point Review and Accomplishments February 10, 2003 Fresno Schools – Making A+ Difference For.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.

Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google