Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAlma Shatswell Modified over 3 years ago

1
1 Pressure-based Solver for Incompressible and Compressible Flows with Cavitation Sunho Park 1, Shin Hyung Rhee 1, and Byeong Rog Shin 2 1 Seoul National University, 2 Changwon National University 8 th International Symposium on Cavitation 13-16 August 2012, Singapore

2
2 □Cavitation ○Cavitation : the liquid phase changes to vapor phase under the certain pressure The liquid phase is usually treated as an incompressible flow The vapor phase is treated as a compressible flow To understand and predict cavitating flows correctly, incompressible and compressible flows should be considered at the same time Bark et al. (2009) vapor liquid

3
3 Incompressible flows -Pressure based method -Pressure is a primary variable -Advantage: liquid phase -Disadvantage: vapor phase Compressible flows -Density based method -Density is a primary variable -Advantage: vapor phase -Disadvantage: liquid phase Incompressible flows with compressibility - Pressure based methods for compressible flows (Rincon and Elder, Issa and Javareshkian, Darbandi et al.)

4
4 □Pressure-based compressible computation method ○Shock waves ○Underwater explosions ○Cavitations □The objectives were ○to develop pressure-based incompressible and isothermal compressible flow solvers, termed SNUFOAM-Cavitation ○to understand compressibility effects in the cavitating flow around the hemispherical head-form body

5
5 ○Mass conservation equation ○Momentum conservation equation ○Standard k- turbulence model

6
6 ○Singhal et al. (2002)

7
7 Incompressible cavitating flow solver Momentum equation using continuity equation take the divergence Turbulence Equations Update Properties Momentum Equation Correct Velocity & Flux Converge? Start Finish Increase t yes no

8
8 Isothermal compressible cavitating flow solver Momentum equation using continuity equation take the divergence Substitute density to pressure Turbulence Equations Update Properties Momentum Equation Correct Velocity & Flux Converge? Start Finish Increase t yes no Continuity Equation

9
9 ○Unsteady state RANS equation solvers were used ○A cell-centered finite volume method was employed ○PISO type algorithm adapted for velocity-pressure coupling ○Convection terms were discretized using a TVD MUSCL scheme ○Diffusion terms were discretized using a central differencing scheme ○Gauss-Seidel iterative algorithm, while an algebraic multi-grid method was employed ○CFD code: SNUFOAM-Cavitation (Developed using OpenFOAM platform)

10
10 □Developed CFD code ○Apply non-cavitating flow around the hemispherical head-form body ○Apply cavitating flow around the hemispherical head-form body □Problem description (Hemispherical head-form body) ○Experiment Rouse, H. and McNown, J. S., 1948 hemispherical (0.5 caliber ogive), blunt (0.0 caliber ogive) and conical (22.5 o cone half-angle) cavitator shapes Cavitation number: 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 & Reynolds number > 10 5

11
11 □Domain size and boundary condition □Mesh ○70 x (70+100) =11,900 ○Axi-sym x (Hemisphere+cylinder)

12
12 □Uncertainty Assessment ○To evaluate the numerical uncertainties in the computational results, the concept of grid convergence index (GCI) was adopted ○Three levels of mesh resolution were considered for the solution convergence of the drag coefficient, and cavity length. ○The solutions show good mesh convergence behavior with errors from the corresponding RE less than 0.5 %. CoarseMediumFinep/RE CDCD 0.08840.09010.09045.155/0.0905 0.01890.0033 GCI 0.00400.0007 l C /R2.1592.1832.1894.120/2.1910 0.01100.0027 GCI 0.00370.0009

13
13 □Non-cavitating flow was simulated and validated against existing experimental data in a three-way comparison ○the compressible flow solver well predicted the incompressible flow ○Both almost same

14
14 □Cavitating flow was simulated and validated against existing experimental data in a three-way comparison ○the incompressible flow solver showed the earlier cavity closure, while the pressure overshoot was more prominent by the isothermal compressible flow solver ○Overall, both results showed quite a close to the existing experimental data. validate developed incompressible and compressible flow solvers

15
15 □The volume fraction contours when the cavity is fully developed ○Overall cavity behavior was almost same for both solvers. ○Noteworthy is the undulation of the cavity interface Variations of the vapor volume fraction due to a re-entrant jet caused the change of the vapor volume, and then the cavity interface showed unsteady undulation Compressible flow solver Fully developed cavity Incompressible flow solver

16
16 □The volume fraction contours when re-entrant jet was greatest developed to its length ○Incompressible flow solution: the cavity shedding was seen near the cavity closure due to a short re-entrant jet ○Compressible flow solution: the cavity shedding was observed up to the middle of the cavity due to a relatively longer re-entrant jet Unsteady undulation of the cavity interface was observed continuously Re-entrant jet Incompressible flow solver Compressible flow solver

17
17 □Cavity shedding cycle ○Observed in the results with compressible flow solution ○Developed cavity dynamics (shedding) repeats below two figures Compressible flow solver cavity is fully developedre-entrant jet is developed longest

18
18 □Streamwise velocity contours when the re-entrant jet was fully developed ○relatively strong and long re-entrant jet, which was in the reverse direction to the freestream flow, was observed Incompressible flow solverCompressible flow solver

19
19 □Nondimensionalized turbulent eddy viscosity contours when the re-entrant jet is fully developed ○The turbulent viscosity was large near the cavity closure in both cases ○In the result of the compressible flow solution, the large turbulent viscosity was seen because of the stronger re-entrant jet. Incompressible flow solverCompressible flow solver

20
20 □Time history of the drag coefficient ○0 x/D 2 ○Incompressible flow solution: converged to a certain constant value ○Compressible flow solution : showed fluctuation behavior due to the unsteady cavity shedding.

21
21 □Strouhal number ○Stinebring et al. (1983) carried out experiments on natural cavitation around axi-symmetric body with Re of 0.35 10 5 to 0.55 10 5 ○The Strouhal number (St) was calculated using the obtained cavity shedding frequency ○St =0 by incompressible flow solver ○The overall trend well captured by the compressible flow solver

22
22 □To simulate the compressibility in the cavitating flow, the incompressible and compressible flow solvers were developed, and validated by applying it to a hemispherical head-form body □In the compressible flow solver ○The re-entrant jet was appeared to be relatively longer and the cavity interface showed unsteady undulation due to the re-entrant jet ○The drag coefficient of the incompressible flow solver was converged to a certain value, while, one of the compressible flow solver showed fluctuation behavior due to the cavity shedding frequency ○The Strouhal number, calculated using the drag coefficient history, shows quite a close agreement between experiments and computations by the compressible flow solver □From the results, the compressible flow computations, which including compressibility effects, were recommended for the computation of cavitating flows

23
23 □This work was supported by the Incorporative Research on Super- Cavitating Underwater Vehicles funded by Agency for Defense Development (09-01-05-26), the World Class University Project (R32-2008- 000-10161-0) and the Research Foundation of Korea (2010-0022835) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of the Korea government.

24
24

Similar presentations

OK

Lecture Objectives: -Define turbulence –Solve turbulent flow example –Define average and instantaneous velocities -Define Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes.

Lecture Objectives: -Define turbulence –Solve turbulent flow example –Define average and instantaneous velocities -Define Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To ensure the functioning of the site, we use **cookies**. We share information about your activities on the site with our partners and Google partners: social networks and companies engaged in advertising and web analytics. For more information, see the Privacy Policy and Google Privacy & Terms.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.

Ads by Google

Free download ppt on roman numerals Ppt on sudoku game Ppt on drug addiction in india Ppt on conservation of environment natural resources Ppt on water conservation download Ppt on ready mix concrete Ppt on summary writing practice Ppt on nickel cadmium battery Ppt on fire extinguisher training Ppt on 2nd world war history