1. Marvin Coleby, Linda El-Halabi, Kendra Hefti-Rossier, Olivier Jarda
Critical Race Theory
Marvin Coleby, Linda El-Halabi, Kendra Hefti-Rossier, Olivier Jarda

2. Roundtable discussion regarding the Multicultural Protection Act.
Omnibus Bill C-30
Roundtable discussion regarding the Multicultural Protection Act.

3. Provision #1 Provision #2 Provision #3 Omnibus Bill C-30
Provides citizens the right to a Canasian education
Allows the freezing of assets of persons found to have wired money to countries of concern in the War on Terror
Provision #2
Provision #3
Introduces an Asian-centric immigration policy
Omnibus Bill C-30

4. Canasian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
If Canasia's Charter was identical to Canada's
Charter, would it adequately protect you under
these provisions?

5. Critical Race Theory, Canadian Law, and Society

6. Revisionism
"We are there because under the Providence of God we are a Christian people that have given to the subject races of the world the only kind of decent government they have ever known [applause] […] and you and I must carry our portion of that responsibility if we are to be the true Imperialists we should be. […] An Imperialist, to me, means a man who accepts gladly and bears proudly the responsibilities of his race and breed." – Prime Minister RB Bennett, 1914
"We also have no history of colonialism. So we have all of the things that many people admire about the great powers but none of the things that threaten or bother them," – Prime Minister Harper, 2009

7. Key Concepts of CRT (Aylward)
Beyond 'trashing': inadequate representation of racial minorities
Necessary racial interpretation of the legal system
Impartiality v. Colorblindness?
CLS’ 'Utopian' Society
The Invisible Obstacle (Christie, Bhaudaria)
“Through the doctrine of precedent, the law is rooted in the past. It becomes difficult to envision a racism-free jurisprudence when the law relies upon concepts derived from a time when chattel slavery existed, women were not persons, and colonization including the theft of Aboriginal lands, was in full force... Legal precedents cannot transcend this racist history. It is one of the primary, yet invisible obstacles within the legal system” (79 – 80)

8. What does CRT add? Rights as relationships (Nedelsky) Reconstruction
Racial Narrative and Legal Analysis
Law: tool vs. impediment
Striking a balance

9. Law and Society Racial context An Act Against Slavery 1793
Public policy as a legitimizer
Multidisciplinary: active participation from philosophers, non-legal scholars

10. Methodology Beyond conventional rights analysis Race is central focus
Contextual juridical analysis
Epistemological diversity
Uses unorthodox structure, language and form
Complexity of multiple identities
"drifting anchors dangling from short chains, far, far overhead" (Williams)
Deconstruction (law as ideology, race relations)
Reconstruction, emancipation (duality)
Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical tools that help us understand and address the inextricable relationship between law and race

11. Race through Canadian Law (Walker)
Discrepancy between Canada's national dream and reality
Race and the Supreme Court
1914: Quong Wing v. The King
1940: Christie v. York Corp.
1951: Noble and Wolfe v. Alley
1955: Narine-Singh v. Attorney General of Canada
Systemic Racism
Immigration
Access to education
Voting rights
Military service
Etc.
What about law and race in Canada today?

12. Policy as Legitimizer (Walker)
Indian Act (1876)
Tool of control and assimilation vs. tool that protects Aboriginal rights
1969: Trudeau proposes repeal of Act
2012: Harper proposes repeal of Act
Safe Streets and Communities Act (SC 2012)
Lowest crime rate in 40 years
Increases mandatory minimum sentences
Reduces the ability of judges to sentence certain offenders to house arrest
Overrepresentation of Aboriginals in the prison system (80% in prairies)
"Let's not talk about statistics, let's talk about danger." - Public Safety Minister Vic Toews
Walker: Reinforcing, legitimizing common attitudes with dignity of law

13. CRT Critique (Gaudreault-DesBiens)
Epistemological privilege
Credibility of the oppressed in the eyes of the oppressor
Generalization of identity – speaking with one voice
Exclusion of critical scholars
The limits of anecdotes
Is 'emancipation' just another utopia?

14. CRT in post 9/11 Canada
Hate crimes against Arabs and Muslims rose by over 1000% since 2001
48% of Canadians approve of racial profiling
Maher Arar, Faisal Joseph, Omar Kader, Liban Hussein of Ottawa
Politicians can get away and even earn political credit for saying that Arabs, Muslims, Iranians, are the new enemies of the West
"Islamicism is the single most pressing threat to national security" - PM Harper to CBC news
3:50-5:20

15. Acceptable Dehumanization

16. CRT's challenge
The increasingly mainstream acceptance of the post 9/11 curtailing of civil liberties of Arabs and Muslims is a new issue for CRT

17. R v RDS in 30 Seconds
1993
Halifax, Nova Scotia 1993

18. The Debate: Contextualists v. Formalists
McLachlin J Major J

19. The Critical Race Narrative of R.D.S.
1. Socio-historical Background
2. Black Neighbourhood
3. The Courtroom

20. The Black Neighbourhood
"a terrain of memory"

21. The Courtroom
“…I am not saying that the Constable has misled the court, although police officers have been known to do that in the past. I am not saying that the officer overreacted, but certainly police officers do overreact, particularly when they are dealing with non-white groups. That to me indicates a state of mind right there that is questionable. I believe that probably the situation in this particular case is the case of a young police officer who overreacted. I do accept the evidence of [R.D.S.] that he was told to shut up or he would be under arrest. It seems to be in keeping with the prevalent attitude of the day.”

22. Did R.D.S. further the CRT Agenda?
1. Narrative
2. Deconstruction
the reasonable person test
the doctrine of reasonable apprehension of bias
the myth of “neutrality” and “objectivity” in the context of judicial decision-making
concept of formal equality
concept of legal reasoning as ahistorical
3. Reconstruction

23. Africville

24. Discussion
“Law should be emancipatory and liberatory for everyone. And, although for Black people, law in Canada has so often operated against us and so seldom worked for us, law remains too valuable a tool for us ever to abandon” (Professor Thornhill).
Being race conscious as a means to tackle racial injustice reifies racial divisions. Discuss.