Presentation on theme: "Human Rights in the SAFE Workplace Simon Gillingham Workplace Consultant City of Winnipeg # 986-4494."— Presentation transcript:
Human Rights in the SAFE Workplace Simon Gillingham Workplace Consultant City of Winnipeg # 986-4494
Worker Rights Every worker has the following rights: ♦ Right to Know ♦ Right to Participate ♦ Right to Refuse
COMPETING RIGHTS Human Rights Legislation Paramount Status To be interpreted broadly Can’t contract out of Human Rights
Edmonton police set to unveil official hijab that Muslim officers can wear on duty SOURCE National Post
Legal Basis The Human Rights Code – 13, 14, 9 (1)(d), 9(2), 12 Court and Tribunal Decisions – “Meiorin” Employment Services
Who is responsible for work accommodations? **Employer** Employee Union
Protected Characteristics? ancestry, including colour and perceived race nationality or national origin ethnic background or origin religion or creed, religious belief, religious association or activity age sex, including pregnancy, the possibility of or circumstances related to pregnancy gender-determined characteristics or circumstances other than those included under ‘sex’ sexual orientation marital or family status source of income political belief, association or activity physical, or mental disability including reliance on a dog guide or other animal assistant, a wheelchair or any other remedial appliance or device New as of June 2012 : Gender Identity and Social Status
Pregnant or nursing workers must be informed of any risk that conditions in the workplace may pose to them or their unborn or nursing child. Where it is reasonably practicable an employer must take steps to minimize the exposure, or if alternate work is available that involves no risk or less risk, assign the worker temporarily to that alternative work.
General Principles Respect for dignity Individualization Inclusion Trial & Error Dignity of Risk ALL ASPECTS !!
In Practice Proactive Reactive !
PROACTIVE WELLNESS PROGRAMS FITNESS PASSES FOR EMPLOYEES ON LTD INCLUDE LTD EMPLOYEES IN TRAINING/ WORK EVENTS JOB STRENGTHING COACH ENCOURAGE WORK HARDENING PROGRAM BEFORE RETURN TO WORK GRACE PERIOD FOR PERFORMANCE
“Employment” broadly defined “ any aspect of an employment or occupation"
Changes required at work? physical workspace, computer software job expectations, requirements, quotas scope of work, bundling hours of work, varied, PT
Challenges Defining Undue hardship is elusive Assessments must be individualized Medical information & privacy issues Employee can refuse to provide medical Cannot require employee to see physician Verifiable evidence vs. impressionistic Inconvenience not Undue Hardship
Mental Health ISSUES Depression most frequent disability  1 in 4 Manitobans will have MH illness Anxiety Stress – claims Supervisor is cause Employee not cognizant Stigma Culpable versus non-culpable
Drug & Alcohol Testing Supreme Court decision 2013 Only test for cause Post incident Record as near miss and/or incident Pre-employment testing? Treat addiction as disability
DUTY TO INQUIRE Onus on Employer to inquire Duty to act Addictions Mitigating factors in discipline hearings Fact versus assumptions
Dignity of Risk Right to make decision Acceptable personal risk No undue risk to other employees No undue risk to public Workers Comp No-Fault insurance No guarantee of absolute safety Verifiable vs. impressionistic Inherent to the job
In Meiorin vs. British Columbia (British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU,  3 S.C.R.) the Supreme Court referred to two inquiries to consider with respect to accommodation: (a)the procedure adopted by the employer to assess the issue of accommodation; and (b)(b) the substantive content of any accommodation offered [Liability attached to both!!]
Searching for an accommodated position
Changes required in a WORK environment? Physical facilities Reduced hours, part-time, work at home Alternate formats for communications Bundling Exceptions to policies (e.g. attendance) Uniforms, equipment, tasks etc. Dignity of Risk.
Cost of doing business More than a mere negligible effort is required to satisfy the duty to accommodate. The use of the term undue infers that some hardship is acceptable. It is only undue hardship that satisfies this test Central Okanagan School Dist. No 23 v. Renaud (1992, Supreme Court of Canada)
NOT REQUIRED… Fundamental changes to position Employee preference!! Paying for no work or unnecessary work Absolutely everything possible Complete unfitness for work for the foreseeable future Ignoring previous accommodations made
B.F.O.Q. Bona Fide and reasonable discrimination does not extend to allow for the failure to accommodate based on 9(2) characteristics.
Bona Fide Occupation Requirement Good Faith and rationally connected? Impossible to Accommodate Evidence of investigating alternatives Consulted with experts Systemic implications Universal or inclusive
F.A.Q. How long does obligation continue? Pay issues After the accommodation Unionized workplaces i.e. cross union Posted vacancies Attendance management Accommodation funding [WCB, EPB,CPP]
PRE-EMPLOYMENT Applicant not required to disclose disability Physical testing must be related Individized testing required If disability disclosed obligation to accommodate Review systemic barriers Section 11 of The Code
Case law Firefighter Ont. [Davis] Safety gear [Steel toe] Paramedic driver’s license [Cassidy-MS] Hearing impaired
County of Brant v. OPSEU, 2013 ONSC 1955 (CanLII) Judicial Review of Labour Arbitration Paramedic with injuries requests accommodation as 3 rd Ambulance attendant Still had lifting restrictions Risks inherent to the position The risks he assumes are potential risks and not direct threats