Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDario Aleck Modified over 9 years ago
1
mediamaticmediamatic manifest 2003 for a Webvirtual [Proto-arte]
2
mediamaticmediamatic manifest 2003 for a Webvirtual [Proto-arte]
3
Artur Matuck School of Communications & Arts University of São Paulo Brazil mediamaticmediamatic manifest 2003
4
P artially de- writ ten by de- scrip t ing machines av ailable at the site Landscript mediamaticmediamatic manifest
5
mediacapik fafisest
6
dediahatic magifejt
7
mebiamatic ganihest
8
cediamatic danifesr
9
meviamafic manifest
10
mediamatih hapifesk
11
mekiamatib makifest
12
mediakatic mapifesc
13
heciamabiz manipest
14
mediabatir manivejr
15
medialakih kanicesk
16
mediahakir janidemt
17
mediamasic manibeht
18
mediamapic manisest
19
mepiakatir dagivecb
20
meciamatic mahijesc
21
mediacktic mansfsst
22
mediamatic manifept
23
mediamatic manifrxt
24
mediamatic manifelt
27
Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology (1)(1)
28
(1)(1) arscience
29
ltrscnc (1)(1)
30
lterscience (1)(1)
31
abtersriskce (1)(1)
32
A plurisemiotic vision conceives art, science and technology as non-exclusive dominions of their operators, proposes an epistemological demarking of their interdisciplinary frontiers. Positing the imbrication as a condition for the exponential growth of the creativity factor of their systems, as long as they renew, intermingle and confusionize themselves. (1)(1) Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology
33
A plurisemiotic vision conceives art, science and technology as non-exclusive dominions of their operators, proposes an epistemological demarking of their interdisciplinary frontiers. Positing the imbrication as a condition for the exponential growth of the creativity factor of their systems, as long as they renew, intermingle and confusionize themselves. (1)(1) xxxxxxx Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology
34
(1)(1) A plurisemiotic vision conceives art, science and technology as non-exclusive dominions of their operators, proposes an epistemological demarking of their interdisciplinary frontiers. Positing the imbrication as a condition for the exponential growth of the creativity factor of their systems, as long as they renew, intermingle and confusionize themselves.
35
Transepistemic projects contaminate thinking systems injecting replicating endemics of self-generating de-structures. Alterscientific writing acts like invading viruses indisciplinating codes and statutes, compressing reconceptualizations through porosities, introducing miniature fragments to provoke artendemics. (1)(1) Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology
36
(1)(1) Transepistemic projects contaminate thinking systems injecting replicating endemics of self-generating de-structures. Alterscientific writing acts like invading viruses indisciplinating codes and statutes, compressing reconceptualizations through porosities, introducing miniature fragments to provoke artendemics.
37
(1)(1) Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology Transepistemic projects contaminate thinking systems injecting replicating endemics of self-generating de-structures. Alterscientific writing acts like invading viruses indisciplinating codes and statutes, compressing reconceptualizations through porosities, introducing miniature fragments to provoke artendemics.
38
(1)(1) Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology Transepistemic projects contaminate thinking systems injecting replicating endemics of self-generating de-structures. Alterscientific writing acts like invading viruses indisciplinating codes and statutes, compressing reconceptualizations through porosities, introducing miniature fragments to provoke artendemics.
39
(1)(1) Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology Transepistemic projects contaminate thinking systems injecting replicating endemics of self-generating de-structures. Alterscientific writing acts like invading viruses indisciplinating codes and statutes, compressing reconceptualizations through porosities, introducing miniature fragments to provoke artendemics. alterscience
40
(1)(1) Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology Transepistemic projects contaminate thinking systems injecting replicating endemics of self-generating de-structures. Alterscientific writing acts like invading viruses indisciplinating codes and statutes, compressing reconceptualizations through porosities, introducing miniature fragments to provoke artendemics. alterscience
41
(1)(1) Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology Transepistemic projects contaminate thinking systems injecting replicating endemics of self-generating de-structures. Alterscientific writing acts like invading viruses indisciplinating codes and statutes, compressing reconceptualizations through porosities, introducing miniature fragments to provoke artendemics. arscience
42
(1)(1) Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology Transepistemic projects contaminate thinking systems injecting replicating endemics of self-generating de-structures. Alterscientific writing acts like invading viruses indisciplinating codes and statutes, compressing reconceptualizations through porosities, introducing miniature fragments to provoke artendemics. ltrscnc
43
(1)(1) Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology Transepistemic projects contaminate thinking systems injecting replicating endemics of self-generating de-structures. Alterscientific writing acts like invading viruses indisciplinating codes and statutes, compressing reconceptualizations through porosities, introducing miniature fragments to provoke artendemics. lterscience
44
(1)(1) Rethinking the epistemological distinction between art, science and technology Transepistemic projects contaminate thinking systems injecting replicating endemics of self-generating de-structures. Alterscientific writing acts like invading viruses indisciplinating codes and statutes, compressing reconceptualizations through porosities, introducing miniature fragments to provoke artendemics. abtersriskce
48
(2)(2) Redefining or expanding the place of creativity from the sign to the technology and from technology to socialization
49
(2)(2) revotecknostgy
50
(2)(2) revoaechnhlogy
51
(2)(2) hevotechnoloby
52
(2)(2) revotecknostgy
53
The technologies that implement the digital culture mobilize a reinvestigation of the stratified formats of the apparatuses, a reinvention of concepts and tools, a continuous thinking in search for [remediatization, reconceptualization, refiguration]. Each technological apparatus even when broadly utilized and disseminated, still maintains an unexplored potential for actualization in other [possible, differentiated, unheard-of and occasionally improper] formats. (2)(2) Redefining or expanding the place of creativity from the sign to the technology and from technology to socialization
54
(2)(2) xxxxxxxxx The technologies that implement the digital culture mobilize a reinvestigation of the stratified formats of the apparatuses, a reinvention of concepts and tools, a continuous thinking in search for [remediatization, reconceptualization, refiguration]. Each technological apparatus even when broadly utilized and disseminated, still maintains an unexplored potential for actualization in other [possible, differentiated, unheard-of and occasionally improper] formats.
55
(2)(2) Redefining or expanding the place of creativity from the sign to the technology and from technology to socialization The technologies that implement the digital culture mobilize a reinvestigation of the stratified formats of the apparatuses, a reinvention of concepts and tools, a continuous thinking in search for [remediatization, reconceptualization, refiguration]. Each technological apparatus even when broadly utilized and disseminated, still maintains an unexplored potential for actualization in other [possible, differentiated, unheard-of and occasionally improper] formats.
56
In this prospection, the most valued aesthetic creation does not limit itself to a recombination of signs but it is focused instead in the reelaboration of [technological, conceptual, instrumental, artefactual and mathematical] processes. This revotechnology introduces new projects for the production and reelaboration of signs causing alternative forms for [saying, listening, perceiving, acting, writing, interacting, socializing, identitying]. (2)(2) Redefining or expanding the place of creativity from the sign to the technology and from technology to socialization
57
(2)(2) In this prospection, the most valued aesthetic creation does not limit itself to a recombination of signs but it is focused instead in the reelaboration of [technological, conceptual, instrumental, artefactual and mathematical] processes. This revotechnology introduces new projects for the production and reelaboration of signs causing alternative forms for [saying, listening, perceiving, acting, writing, interacting, socializing, identitying].
58
(2)(2) Redefining or expanding the place of creativity from the sign to the technology and from technology to socialization In this prospection, the most valued aesthetic creation does not limit itself to a recombination of signs but it is focused instead in the reelaboration of [technological, conceptual, instrumental, artefactual and mathematical] processes. This revotechnology introduces new projects for the production and reelaboration of signs causing alternative forms for [saying, listening, perceiving, acting, writing, interacting, socializing, identitying].
62
Reconducting the scene of learning to the dual space of interaction (3)(3)
63
(3)(3) webvirthal
64
(3)(3) wekvertuil
65
(3)(3) webvrtl
66
(3)(3) wbvrtal
67
The traditional learning space [atelier, studio, academy, school] enlarges, increases, stretches itself into a new individual space of infotelematics and from there to the net-rhizome, the distributed collective of the virtual. The webvirtual space, in which an increasing number of information [images, texts, languages, signs, possibilities] present themselves, incites and requires new strategies to prehend [apprehend, repprehend, reappreheend, sur-prehend]. (3)(3) Reconducting the scene of learning to the dual space of interaction
68
(3)(3) The traditional learning space [atelier, studio, academy, school] enlarges, increases, stretches itself into a new individual space of infotelematics and from there to the net-rhizome, the distributed collective of the virtual. The webvirtual space, in which an increasing number of information [images, texts, languages, signs, possibilities] present themselves, incites and requires new strategies to prehend [apprehend, repprehend, reappreheend, sur-prehend].
69
(3)(3) Reconducting the scene of learning to the dual space of interaction The traditional learning space [atelier, studio, academy, school] enlarges, increases, stretches itself into a new individual space of infotelematics and from there to the net-rhizome, the distributed collective of the virtual. The webvirtual space, in which an increasing number of information [images, texts, languages, signs, possibilities] present themselves, incites and requires new strategies to prehend [apprehend, repprehend, reappreheend, sur-prehend].
70
(3)(3) Reconducting the scene of learning to the dual space of interaction The traditional learning space [atelier, studio, academy, school] enlarges, increases, stretches itself into a new individual space of infotelematics and from there to the net-rhizome, the distributed collective of the virtual. The webvirtual space, in which an increasing number of information [images, texts, languages, signs, possibilities] present themselves, incites and requires new strategies to prehend [apprehend, repprehend, reappreheend, sur-prehend].
71
(3)(3) Reconducting the scene of learning to the dual space of interaction The process of redefinition of the pedagogical space and of its actants requires continuous investigation, constant search for unconventional ways to integrate carbon and silica. The primordial scene of listening incessantly reflows towards dual spaces that require integrated and occasionally simultaneous performances in the presential and the virtual realms, in the free market of resignification.
72
(3)(3) xxxxxx Reconducting the scene of learning to the dual space of interaction The process of redefinition of the pedagogical space and of its actants requires continuous investigation, constant search for unconventional ways to integrate carbon and silica. The primordial scene of listening incessantly reflows towards dual spaces that require integrated and occasionally simultaneous performances in the presential and the virtual realms, in the free market of resignification.
73
The process of redefinition of the pedagogical space and of its actants requires continuous investigation, constant search for unconventional ways to integrate carbon and silica. The primordial scene of listening incessantly reflows towards dual spaces that require integrated and occasionally simultaneous performances in the presential and the virtual realms, in the free market of resignification. (3)(3) Reconducting the scene of learning to the dual space of interaction
77
(4)(4) Relocating the spectator inside the mediatic apparatus
78
(4)(4) rhizocammuni
79
(4)(4) rhazoconmlni
80
(4)(4) rhhzocomlunity
81
(4)(4) ehizocomduni
82
(4)(4) Traditionally, the spectator who finds himself/herself before art [canvas, wall, mirror] becomes a fruitional operational subject that is now inside art, intra-art [performance, installation, communication, spatialization] able to move and act. This process occurs naturally as long as art redefines itself from sign elaboration to technological creativity and from there to socio-machinic and identitying processes. Relocating the spectator inside the mediatic apparatus
83
(4)(4) Traditionally, the spectator who finds himself/herself before art [canvas, wall, mirror] becomes a fruitional operational subject that is now inside art, intra-art [performance, installation, communication, spatialization] able to move and act. This process occurs naturally as long as art redefines itself from sign elaboration to technological creativity and from there to socio-machinic and identitying processes.
84
(4)(4) Relocating the spectator inside the mediatic apparatus Traditionally, the spectator who finds himself/herself before art [canvas, wall, mirror] becomes a fruitional operational subject that is now inside art, intra-art [performance, installation, communication, spatialization] able to move and act. This process occurs naturally as long as art redefines itself from sign elaboration to technological creativity and from there to socio-machinic and identitying processes.
85
(4)(4) Places for spectators are recreated and spectators for other places are also created. Mediamatic, fragmented, enclosed, isolated and terminated processes become continuous, comprehensive and impermanent. Such expanding and rhizocommunitarian processes dissapear as artistic activity. They momentarily lose visibility to resurface when conditions of visuality are transformed. Relocating the spectator inside the mediatic apparatus
86
(4)(4) Art-research intends to create and maintain conditions allowing new processes, characteristic of the emergent digital culture, to be acknowledged as creative propositions even if they are not similar to the normative processes regarded as art. Relocating the spectator inside the mediatic apparatus
87
(4)(4) xxxxx Relocating the spectator inside the mediatic apparatus Art-research intends to create and maintain conditions allowing new processes, characteristic of the emergent digital culture, to be acknowledged as creative propositions even if they are not similar to the normative processes regarded as art.
88
(4)(4) Relocating the spectator inside the mediatic apparatus Art-research intends to create and maintain conditions allowing new processes, characteristic of the emergent digital culture, to be acknowledged as creative propositions even if they are not similar to the normative processes regarded as art.
92
(5)(5) Re-inventing the sign-operator artist in order to acknowledge the meta-artist as mediamatic systems proposer
93
(5)(5) aeta-auuhor
94
(5)(5) meja-nutfor
95
(5)(5) meta-asunthor
96
(5)(5) beta-atthor
97
To reconsider the artist or cultural operator as a sign-operator individual. To conceive the collective operator who proposes sociotechnical processes for integration. This collective, widely spread, rhizomatic subject de- orders the system, de-authorizes the individual, challenges the semiology of certitudes, through plurilingual multitexts. (5)(5) Re-inventing the sign-operator artist in order to acknowledge the meta-artist as mediamatic systems proposer
98
(5)(5) xxxxxxxx Re-inventing the sign-operator artist in order to acknowledge the meta-artist as mediamatic systems proposer To reconsider the artist or cultural operator as a sign-operator individual. To conceive the collective operator who proposes sociotechnical processes for integration. This collective, widely spread, rhizomatic subject de- orders the system, de-authorizes the individual, challenges the semiology of certitudes, through plurilingual multitexts.
99
(5)(5) Re-inventing the sign-operator artist in order to acknowledge the meta-artist as mediamatic systems proposer To reconsider the artist or cultural operator as a sign-operator individual. To conceive the collective operator who proposes sociotechnical processes for integration. This collective, widely spread, rhizomatic subject de- orders the system, de-authorizes the individual, challenges the semiology of certitudes, through plurilingual multitexts.
100
Emerging character in the cultural artistic millieu he or she proposes to create systemic reorderings, successive de-structures. In this prospective, the artist as the meta-author, reveals himself or herself as a system maker, a mediasynthatic creator, an event generator, a process mediator, a multidialogic interlocutor, or even a photographer of hybridizations (man-machine, man-machine-man interactions). (5)(5) Re-inventing the sign-operator artist in order to acknowledge the meta-artist as mediamatic systems proposer
101
(5)(5) Emerging character in the cultural artistic millieu he or she proposes to create systemic reorderings, successive de-structures. In this prospective, the artist as the meta-author, reveals himself or herself as a system maker, a mediasynthatic creator, an event generator, a process mediator, a multidialogic interlocutor, or even a photographer of hybridizations (man-machine, man- machine-man interactions).
102
(5)(5) Re-inventing the sign-operator artist in order to acknowledge the meta-artist as mediamatic systems proposer Emerging character in the cultural artistic millieu he or she proposes to create systemic reorderings, successive de-structures. In this prospective, the artist as the meta-author, reveals himself or herself as a system maker, a mediasynthatic creator, an event generator, a process mediator, a multidialogic interlocutor, or even a photographer of hybridizations (man-machine, man- machine-man interactions).
103
(5)(5) Re-inventing the sign-operator artist in order to acknowledge the meta-artist as mediamatic systems proposer Emerging character in the cultural artistic millieu he or she proposes to create systemic reorderings, successive de-structures. In this prospective, the artist as the meta-author, reveals himself or herself as a system maker, a mediasynthatic creator, an event generator, a process mediator, a multidialogic interlocutor, or even a photographer of hybridizations (man-machine, man- machine-man interactions).
107
(6)(6) Repositioning the art spaces in the mediamatic universe
108
(6)(6) mediaaenesis
109
(6)(6) mediageoesis
110
(6)(6) mvdiagenesis
111
(6)(6) nedmarenvsii
112
(6)(6) To redefine the institutional spaces for art [museums, galleries, departments) not as spaces for valuing, for collecting, for memory, but as spaces for intercommunication and multiculturalization instead. In this mediagenetic process, the spaces for artistic production and for exhibitions would become dynamic centers, implementing nuclei of artistic possibilities. Repositioning the art spaces in the mediamatic universe
113
(6)(6) To redefine the institutional spaces for art [museums, galleries, departments) not as spaces for valuing, for collecting, for memory, but as spaces for intercommunication and multiculturalization instead. In this mediagenetic process, the spaces for artistic production and for exhibitions would become dynamic centers, implementing nuclei of artistic possibilities.
114
(6)(6) Repositioning the art spaces in the mediamatic universe To redefine the institutional spaces for art [museums, galleries, departments) not as spaces for valuing, for collecting, for memory, but as spaces for intercommunication and multiculturalization instead. In this mediagenetic process, the spaces for artistic production and for exhibitions would become dynamic centers, implementing nuclei of artistic possibilities.
115
(6)(6) Repositioning the art spaces in the mediamatic universe To redefine the institutional spaces for art [museums, galleries, departments) not as spaces for valuing, for collecting, for memory, but as spaces for intercommunication and multiculturalization instead. In this mediagenetic process, the spaces for artistic production and for exhibitions would become dynamic centers, implementing nuclei of artistic possibilities.
116
(6)(6) Continuous, open-ended, imprecise, unfinished processes, still pose questions for its own memorization, collecting, filing and valorization. The art space becomes a terminal for intercommunication but endowed with a mnemonic, self-scripting and teleactive system. Repositioning the art spaces in the mediamatic universe
117
(6)(6) xxxx Repositioning the art spaces in the mediamatic universe Continuous, open-ended, imprecise, unfinished processes, still pose questions for its own memorization, collecting, filing and valorization. The art space becomes a terminal for intercommunication but endowed with a mnemonic, self-scripting and teleactive system.
118
(6)(6) Repositioning the art spaces in the mediamatic universe Continuous, open-ended, imprecise, unfinished processes, still pose questions for its own memorization, collecting, filing and valorization. The art space becomes a terminal for intercommunication but endowed with a mnemonic, self-scripting and teleactive system.
122
(7)(7) Reevaluating the merchandise status of an artifact by valuing dynamic processes of movement and expansion.
123
(7)(7) sacred phraeites
124
(7)(7) sacred parvshtts
125
(7)(7) sycred parasites
126
(7)(7) sacred aurasites
127
(7)(7) To resist the proprietary status of static, identifiable and permanent objects, sacred parasites of sacrosantic spaces. To invest objectives in dynamic, mutant, collective and performatic objects, those inapprehendable by the market. Those that script themselves in signs and launch themselves into the distance, they reserve and void places for tangible bodies in their mutual encounters. Reevaluating the merchandise status of an artifact by valuing dynamic processes of movement and expansion.
128
(7)(7) To resist the proprietary status of static, identifiable and permanent objects, sacred parasites of sacrosantic spaces. To invest objectives in dynamic, mutant, collective and performatic objects, those inapprehendable by the market. Those that script themselves in signs and launch themselves into the distance, they reserve and void places for tangible bodies in their mutual encounters.
129
(7)(7) Reevaluating the merchandise status of an artifact by valuing dynamic processes of movement and expansion. To resist the proprietary status of static, identifiable and permanent objects, sacred parasites of sacrosantic spaces. To invest objectives in dynamic, mutant, collective and performatic objects, those inapprehendable by the market. Those that script themselves in signs and launch themselves into the distance, they reserve and void places for tangible bodies in their mutual encounters.
133
(8)(8) Resisting [protesting, rejecting, disagreeing] the criminalizing status of [self] replication of [quasi] intelligent systems
134
(8)(8) de-crimdnal
135
(8)(8) de-crimidel
136
(8)(8) d-criminal
137
(8)(8) d-crimnal
138
(8)(8) Functions could be alternated between creator and creature, author and reader, programmer and user, since meta-creation programs systems that un-stabilizes permanent roles. The irrepressible implementation of revotechnological processes cannot, however, totally irrupt because technothought remains reserved, the program _ ………. _ proprietary and the culture continues capital-intensive. Resisting [protesting, rejecting, disagreeing] the criminalizing status of [self] replication of [quasi] intelligent systems
139
(8)(8) Functions could be alternated between creator and creature, author and reader, programmer and user, since meta-creation programs systems that un-stabilizes permanent roles. The irrepressible implementation of revotechnological processes cannot, however, totally irrupt because technothought remains reserved, the program _ ………. _ proprietary and the culture continues capital-intensive.
140
(8)(8) The reversion from proprietary programmer to the user remains stigmatized through a pseudocampaign, criminalized by so-called subjects-creators of the cultural capital. Terminals are vivified when their potentials for reproduction [dissemination, interrogation, invasion, reelaboration] are fully utilized. The de-criminalized status of the operators arises as a new right in the webvirtual multiverse. Resisting [protesting, rejecting, disagreeing] the criminalizing status of [self] replication of [quasi] intelligent systems
141
(8)(8) xxxxxx xxxx Resisting [protesting, rejecting, disagreeing] the criminalizing status of [self] replication of [quasi] intelligent systems The reversion from proprietary programmer to the user remains stigmatized through a pseudocampaign, criminalized by so-called subjects-creators of the cultural capital. Terminals are vivified when their potentials for reproduction [dissemination, interrogation, invasion, reelaboration] are fully utilized. The de-criminalized status of the operators arises as a new right in the webvirtual multiverse.
142
(8)(8) Resisting [protesting, rejecting, disagreeing] the criminalizing status of [self] replication of [quasi] intelligent systems The reversion from proprietary programmer to the user remains stigmatized through a pseudocampaign, criminalized by so-called subjects-creators of the cultural capital. Terminals are vivified when their potentials for reproduction [dissemination, interrogation, invasion, reelaboration] are fully utilized. The de-criminalized status of the operators arises as a new right in the webvirtual multiverse.
143
(8)(8) Resisting [protesting, rejecting, disagreeing] the criminalizing status of [self] replication of [quasi] intelligent systems The reversion from proprietary programmer to the user remains stigmatized through a pseudocampaign, criminalized by so-called subjects-creators of the cultural capital. Terminals are vivified when their potentials for reproduction [dissemination, interrogation, invasion, reelaboration] are fully utilized. The de-criminalized status of the operators arises as a new right in the webvirtual multiverse.
144
(8)(8) Resisting [protesting, rejecting, disagreeing] the criminalizing status of [self] replication of [quasi] intelligent systems The reversion from proprietary programmer to the user remains stigmatized through a pseudocampaign, criminalized by so-called subjects-creators of the cultural capital. Terminals are vivified when their potentials for reproduction [dissemination, interrogation, invasion, reelaboration] are fully utilized. The de-criminalized status of the operators arises as a new right in the webvirtual multiverse.
148
(9)(9) Re-delimiting the hierarchies between artists, critics, curators by resisting their artcultural authorizations
149
(9)(9) art-reseirch
150
(9)(9) art-reslamch
151
(9)(9) art-rsrch
152
(9)(9) rt-resrch
153
Art-research becomes self-legitimizing, searching for alternative processes to verify values that do not have to be sustained by pseudo-knowers. Meta-art as a conceptual instrument that offers the possibility and the right to create in systemic levels exponentially expanding the field of action and intervention. (9)(9) Re-delimiting the hierarchies between artists, critics, curators by resisting their artcultural authorizations
154
(9)(9) xxxxxxx Re-delimiting the hierarchies between artists, critics, curators by resisting their artcultural authorizations Art-research becomes self-legitimizing, searching for alternative processes to verify values that do not have to be sustained by pseudo-knowers. Meta-art as a conceptual instrument that offers the possibility and the right to create in systemic levels exponentially expanding the field of action and intervention.
155
(9)(9) Re-delimiting the hierarchies between artists, critics, curators by resisting their artcultural authorizations Art-research becomes self-legitimizing, searching for alternative processes to verify values that do not have to be sustained by pseudo-knowers. Meta-art as a conceptual instrument that offers the possibility and the right to create in systemic levels exponentially expanding the field of action and intervention.
156
(9)(9) Re-delimiting the hierarchies between artists, critics, curators by resisting their artcultural authorizations Art-research becomes self-legitimizing, searching for alternative processes to verify values that do not have to be sustained by pseudo-knowers. Meta-art as a conceptual instrument that offers the possibility and the right to create in systemic levels exponentially expanding the field of action and intervention.
157
(9)(9) Re-delimiting the hierarchies between artists, critics, curators by resisting their artcultural authorizations Art-research becomes self-legitimizing, searching for alternative processes to verify values that do not have to be sustained by pseudo-knowers. Meta-art as a conceptual instrument that offers the possibility and the right to create in systemic levels exponentially expanding the field of action and intervention.
158
The webvirtual space as an institution for collective expression and communication un-stabilizing legislated and controlled spaces, un-remained. The webvirtual gradually disrupts, its subculture pours out, melts away, prompting itself in the concrete, announcing a bodily re-ordering, extended through the city territories. (9)(9) Re-delimiting the hierarchies between artists, critics, curators by resisting their artcultural authorizations
162
(10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
163
(10)(10) he-lcripting
164
(10)(10) de-scripcinz
165
(10)(10) d-scripting
166
(10)(10) d-scriptng
167
(10)(10) Writing as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. Writing as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. Writing as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters. Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
168
(10)(10) Writing as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. Writing as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. Writing as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters. Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
169
(10)(10) Writing as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. Writing as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. Writing as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters.
170
(10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process Writing as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. Writing as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. Writing as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters.
171
(10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process He-lcripting as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. He-lcripting as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. He-lcripting as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters.
172
(10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process He-lcripting as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. He-lcripting as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. He-lcripting as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters.
173
(10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process He-lcripting as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. He-lcripting as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. He-lcripting as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters.
174
(10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process De-scripcinz as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. De-scripcinz as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. De-scripcinz as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters.
175
(10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process De-scripcinz as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. De-scripcinz as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. De-scripcinz as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters.
176
(10)(10) D-scripting as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. D-scripting as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. D-scripting as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters. Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
177
(10)(10) D-scriptng as interpellation of texts, discourses, speeches, subjects, identities, codes and genres. D-scriptng as a transdialogic, uninterrupted process. D-scriptng as excrescence of alphanumeric keyboards. As randomic programming encounters. Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
178
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
179
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
180
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
181
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
182
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
183
(10)(10) As effects of in consistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
184
(10)(10) As effects of in consistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
185
(10)(10) As effects of in consistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs....
186
(10)(10) As effects of in consistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
187
(10)(10) As effects of in consistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
188
(10)(10) As effects of in consistent machines.... signifying sequ ences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
189
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
190
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
191
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
192
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
193
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... Thoughts that Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
194
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... Thoughts that Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
195
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... Thoughts that
196
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... Thoughts that Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
197
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
198
(10)(10) As effects of inconsistent machines.... signifying sequences of signs corrupted by the machinic desire for repetition... Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
199
(10)(10) Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
200
(10)(10) Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
201
(10)(10) Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
202
(10)(10) Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
203
(10)(10) Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
204
(10)(10) Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
205
Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... (10)(10)
206
(10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
207
Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... (10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
208
Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... (10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
209
Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... (10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
210
Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... (10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
211
Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... (10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
212
Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... (10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
213
Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... (10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
214
Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... (10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
215
Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... (10)(10)
216
(10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
217
(10)(10) Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language.... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
218
(10)(10) Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language....
219
(10)(10) Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process Thoughts that result from the incidental encounters of letters... unknown language signs.... letters and sequences that question us... that interact with our perceptive systems even though, they insist, still, they persist, those signs that do not establish themselves as language....
220
(10)(10).... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
221
(10)(10).... Redefining writing as an intrapersonal linear process into a rhizomatic, machinic, hybrid, randomic, incidental process
227
Brazil, 2004 a project by Artur Matuck graphic design: Manlio M. Speranzini mediamaticmediamatic manifest for a Webvirtual [Proto-arte]
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.