Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Adding local value to Commissioning for Value

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Adding local value to Commissioning for Value"— Presentation transcript:

1 Adding local value to Commissioning for Value
Lucy Jackson Consultant in Public Health Leeds City Council

2 What did we do with Commissioning for value?
Ensured it made sense locally. Choose issue for a local reason too. Added local data – to add to the pathway and triangulate. Wider footprint of Leeds but local too - 3 CCGs agreed on the same 2 areas. Brought all players together – Clinicians; CCG commissioners; Local Public Health with PHE. Citywide and within each CCG to work through. Ownership of approach - Conversations with clinical fora in each CCG – does this make sense , prioritise actions?

3 Local Strategic Context – Leeds Joint Health and Well Being Strategy
Vision - Leeds will be a healthy and caring city for all ages Principle - People who are the poorest will improve their health the fastest Outcome one - People will live longer and have healthier lives

4 Use CFV but also locally what fits - the life expectancy gap by cause of death
Scarf chart showing the breakdown of the life expectancy gap between Leeds as a whole and England as a whole, by cause of death, How to put GP referrals in here Will NHS comparators activity be different from the spend?

5 NHS LEEDS SOUTH AND EAST CCG
Local Data: GP audit and healthy living service referral data summarised by CCG NHS LEEDS NORTH CCG NHS LEEDS SOUTH AND EAST CCG NHS LEEDS WEST CCG Leeds CHD prevalence 3.3% 3.8% 3.1% 3.4% Health checks uptake 60.2% 65.2% 51.5% 57.7% Smoking 18.6% 27.0% 22.0% 22.7% Smokers referred to smoking services (including prompted self referral) 9.0% 9.1% 4.2% 7.0% Obesity 19.5% 25.7% 19.9% 21.7% Recorded BMI >30 referred to weight management service 2.2% 2.1% 1.5% 1.9% Alcohol Short screening (FAST or AUDIT-C) 6.3% 6.7% Completed full AUDIT screening 1.1% 0.7% 4.1% 2.3% Screened as positive (Hazardous/harmful/dependant drinkers) 9.9% 21.5% 34.9% 30.8% Brief intervention (in GP practice) 4.5% 8.7% Scoring 20+ on AUDIT who have been referred for specialist advice for dependant drinking 1.8% 0.4% 0.5% Local Data Local agreement with all GPs in Leeds to audit their data

6 Local Data: Obesity prevalence
Obesity prevalence versus % weight management referrals Low obesity prevalence High weight management referrals High obesity prevalence High weight management referrals Practices which have high obesity prevalence and low percentage of weight management referrals : (For a full list of all practice's see appendix 5) Practice cluster GP practice name % Obese Referrals Pentagon 21.7% 0.9% Triangle 22.7% 1.7% Kite 21.3% 0.4% Hexagon 20.4% 0.6% 20.0% 25.7% 19.5% 2.2% 1.6% Circle 23.1% 0.7% 26.7%* 0.0% Mapped prevalence and referral data Low obesity prevalence Low weight management referrals High obesity prevalence Low weight management referrals * Statistically different to the CCG Practices within the dotted line do not have statistically different level of obesity prevalence and % of weight management referrals to the CCG as a whole

7 Local Data: Smoking prevalence
Smoking prevalence versus % smoking referrals Local Data Low % smokers High% smokers referred High % smokers High% smokers referred Practices which have a high % of smokers and low percentage of smokers referred: (For a full list of all practices see appendix 5) Practice cluster GP practice name % Smoking Smoking referrals Triangle 30.3% 8.3% 33.2% 4.7% 29.1% 8.1% 34.2% 1.4% 34.1% 3.3% Oval 6.6% 39.9% 4.6% 37.1% 3.4% Circle 33.4% 3.8% 31.5% 2.0% 33.6% 5.3% 32.3% 6.9% 37.4% 4.1% No cluster 27.8% 3.6% Low % smokers Low% smokers referred High % smokers Low % smokers referred Practices within the dotted line do not have statistically different level of smoking prevalence and % of smoking referrals to the CCG as a whole

8 Overarching messages for Leeds -CVD Summary:
Public health focus on prevention; specifically smoking prevalence (Leeds South & East and Leeds West) smoking cessation (All) and Obesity (Leeds South & East) Significant benefit to patients if improvement to Primary Care management indicators were made (All) High emergency admissions for CVD (Leeds South & East), costs (Leeds North and Leeds South & East) and lengths of stay (All) High costs for CHD emergency admissions (Leeds North and Leeds South & East) and high costs for CHD elective admissions (Leeds South & East) High emergency admissions for Heart Failure and Stroke (Leeds South & East and Leeds West) High costs for Angiography procedures (All), CABG procedures (All) and Angioplasty procedures (Leeds West) High lengths of stay for Angiography procedures (Leeds West)

9 Respiratory Summary Summary on a page
Public health focus on prevention; specifically smoking prevalence (Leeds South & East and Leeds West) and smoking cessation (All) Significant benefit to patients if improvement to Primary Care management indicators were made (All) High emergency admissions for Influenza & Pneumonia (Leeds South & East and Leeds West) High COPD emergency readmissions (Leeds South & East and Leeds West) High costs for Respiratory (All), COPD (Leeds North and Leeds West), Asthma (Leeds South & East), Upper Respiratory (Leeds South & East) and Other Acute lower (Leeds South & East and Leeds West) emergency admissions High lengths of stay for Upper Respiratory (Leeds South & East) and Other Acute Lower (Leeds North and Leeds South & East) Significant variation in corticosteroids prescribing between practices (All) Summary on a page

10 Actions ………….. Public Health – challenge to jointly re look at commissioning of healthy living services key priority for the Council. Primary care – variation target work with key practices and embed into engagement schemes in each CCG Whole pathway – flow and variation – LIQH. CCG commissioning – using packs as part of prioritisation framework Transformation work streams -Acute – elective care value approach; Integrated Care – Pathways work; PYLL trajectories.

11 The LIQH approach

12 LIQH – focussed areas CVD improving the management of chest pain;
optimise outcomes and quality of care for people requiring interventions/ treatment for suspected/confirmed arrhythmia and to prevent inappropriate use of secondary services. to improve the physical and psychological health of patients’ post-MI with new or existing anxiety / depression. COPD support people with COPD to manage their own condition and to reduce the likelihood and impact of exacerbations; reduction in variation of approach to COPD patients in crisis; Improving the early and accurate diagnosis of COPD whilst improving patient experience.


Download ppt "Adding local value to Commissioning for Value"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google