Presentation on theme: "Reciprocal Altruism and Group Behavior"— Presentation transcript:
1Reciprocal Altruism and Group Behavior By Alejandra Fernandez-Ortega
2Reciprocal AltruismBeneficial acts to non-relatives that are later repaid by the beneficiaryPrerequisites:Cost of the altruistic act must be lower than the benefit to the actorAnimals must be capable of recognizing each other in order to reciprocate and detect cheatsMust have reasonably long lifespan in order to re-encounter individuals and to have the chance for reciprocation to occurUnlike kin selection, rare in animal kingdom
3Examples of Reciprocal Altruism in Animal Kingdom Olive baboonsVampire batsGreen woos hoopoeDolphinsVervet monkey
4Examples of Reciprocity in Pre-Industrial Societies Yanomamo of South AmericaSmall, permanent villages and slash-burn agricultureDivision of labor, economic specialization and trade economyReciprocity more limited, wealth accumulated and not equally divided!Kung San of South AfricaSmall, nomadic bands of hunter-gatherersGift economy-all meat shared equally across tribe, with expected reciprocityHoarding meat or boasting about hunting skill is cultural tabooMakes evolutionary sense within nomadic hunter gather societyExtremely high murder rate
5Game Theory and the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Theory: finding the best possible solution to a problem taking into account what everyone else doesPrisoner’s dilemma: the optimal outcome for a group is achieved only when each individual cooperates, or makes a decision that would not be in his individual best interestsR=mutual reward for cooperation, T=temptation to defect, P=Punishment for mutual defection, S=sucker’s payoffT>R>P>S
6Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma and Reciprocal Altruism In a single occurring prisoners dilemma, logical choice is to defectHowever, in re-occurring social situations, people fall into patterns of mutual cooperation because they each know that if they cooperate they can expect future cooperation in the form of reciprocity and if they defect, they can expect retaliation in the futureTit-for-tatNiceRetaliatoryForgiving
7Indirect Reciprocation Critique of reciprocal altruism theory-people commit acts of altruism that cannot hope to be repaid directly by the beneficiaryE.g. blood driveIndirect reciprocation-demonstrating cooperation and selflessness makes others more likely to cooperate in the futureReputation and social worthKarma?
8Study of Individual Differences in Reciprocity Styles (Houser & Kurzban, 2004) Subjects randomly assigned to a series of 4-person groups for at least 7 gamesCould invest tokens into private accounts or pool into a public account to be doubled and shared (Prisoner’s Dilemma)Each participant in turn given at least one chance to change allocation based on current total contribution to public account
9Results Cooperation strategies proved stable across games Cooperators (13%)-contributed a great deal most of the time, regardless of overall group contribution (~50 tokens)Free riders (20%)-contributed almost nothing most of the time, regardless of overall group contribution (~1 token)Reciprocators (63%)-based their contributions on how much others in each game contributed (~25 tokens)-No statistical difference in individual earnings between typesGroup composition predicted future cooperation levels
10ImplicationsIn any given population there are stable, distinct, and co-existing cooperative strategies that predict reciprocal altruismCooperators-contribute to group welfare at cost to selfFree riders-do not contribute, no cost to selfReciprocators-conditional strategyHigh levels of free riders reciprocators in a population predict a break down in group cooperation and reciprocity.
11Personality Traits and Social Cognitive Beliefs Predicting Altruistic Styles (Alessandri et. al., 2009)Study:377 adolescentsCompleted measurement scales measuring trait agreeableness, social cognitive self evaluations and prosociality at ages 16 and 18Findings and implications:Agreeableness personality trait and empathic self efficacy beliefs were correlated with degree of cooperation and self sacrificing altruistic behaviors.High degree of heritability for agreeableness implies that individual differences in altruistic behavior are largely heritableChanges in agreeableness and empathic self efficacy across time predicted similar changes in altruistic and other prosocial behaviorsIn general, females score higher on agreeableness, empathic self efficacy, and altruistic prosocial behaviors compared to malesAgreeableness as a broad personality trait may have evolved as a general mechanism for direct and indirect social reciprocity
12Social Cognition and the Development of Reciprocal Altruism (Barret & Tooby, 2010) While many animals have kin selection, very few species have reciprocal altruismHypothesis: for reciprocal altruism to be effective, must have theory of mind necessary to predict the intents of others, to maximize reciprocal gain and minimize free riding lossesHumans have evolved special cheater detection mechanisms to predict the intents of humans which help us make decisions about whether or not to reciprocate
13Study: “Ability” condition “Intent” condition “Benefit” conditionHypothesis: people should be able to predict whether or not someone has an incentive to “cheat” or free ride based on whether or not they would benefitFinding: Research subjects increased their vigilance for cheating by 20% when they believed that the person’s kin would gain by free loading behavior“Ability” conditionHypothesis: people should be more wary of potential cheating and dishonesty if they believe that the other person has the opportunity to free rideFinding: if potential cheaters lost the opportunity to cheat due to lack of knowledge, vigilance decreased by 20%“Intent” conditionHypothesis: People should be more wary of free loaders if they know the subject has the intent to cheatSubjects cued to possibility of intentional or accidental rule breaking; vigilance increased dramatically during “intent” condition but not “accidental” condition
14Study Conclusion:Reciprocal altruism is an effective strategy for humans because we have evolved an advanced theory of mind and the necessary social cognitive strategies to root out and exclude free ridersReciprocal altruism is rare in the animal kingdom because most animals lack the necessary theory of mind to successfully prevent free riding