Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST Navy Energy Program and Initiatives LCDR J. Doug Herrin, P.E., C.E.M. October 4, 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "NAVFAC SOUTHEAST Navy Energy Program and Initiatives LCDR J. Doug Herrin, P.E., C.E.M. October 4, 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 NAVFAC SOUTHEAST Navy Energy Program and Initiatives LCDR J. Doug Herrin, P.E., C.E.M. October 4, 2012

2 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Fort Worth Corpus Christi Kingsville Barksdale Meridian New Orleans Gulfport Keesler Pensacola Whiting Field Panama City Albany Orlando Key West NAVFAC SE AOR Shaw Charleston Beaufort Kings Bay Mayport Jacksonville Cape Canaveral Guantanamo Bay Haiti Blount Island 2

3 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast NAVFAC SE Business Volume Workload - OperationsFY12FY13 Capital Improvements(projected) Work-In-Place (WIP)$ 783 M$ 819 M Design (DIP=$643M FY 12, DIP = $578M FY 13)$51.4 M$46.2 M Contingency Engineering$ 6.00 M$10.0 M Public Works Facilities-In-Place (FIP)$ M$ M Facilities Sustainment & FSC Support$ 47.3 M$ 53.0 M Utilities$ 273.7M$ M BSVE$ 30.8 M$ 28.0 M Environmental Environmental Services (In-House)$ 2.8 M Quality(excludes salary $’s)$ 12.0 M$ 10.0 M ERN$ 26.0 M$ 25.1 M BRAC$ 9.0 M Asset Management – Planning/Real Estate-In-Place$ 77.3 M$ 68.5 M TOTALS:$ B$ B 3

4 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Navy Energy Priorities Security “Protection from vulnerabilities related to the commercial electric grid, which is susceptible to physical and cyber attack, natural disaster, and malfunction” – Naval Energy: A Strategic Approach (2009) Navy increases shore energy security by decreasing energy consumption, increasing energy efficiency, increasing use of alternatives, and increasing the reliability of its energy supply to critical assets Independence “achieved when naval forces rely on energy resources that are not subject to intentional or accidental supply disruptions” – Naval Energy: A Strategic Approach (2009) Fuel itself, transportation, and each terminus on its route should remain secure from genesis to use Provide secure, reliable, and affordable energy to our Navy and Marine Corps Mitigate dependence on, and vulnerability to the commercial grid and become more energy efficient in the process 4

5 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Department of the Navy’s Energy Profile DOD is the single largest energy consumer in the nation DOD accounts for 80% of the Federal Government’s energy consumption Department of the Navy 102 installations worldwide 90, 045 buildings totaling more than 663M square feet Consumes 28% of DoD’s operational and shore energy FY11 installation energy Consumed 8,850 GWh of electrical power Produced or procured approximately 1,770 GWh of renewable energy on or near its installations – 20% of demand 5

6 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Geothermal Energy A 270-megawatt renewable energy geothermal power plant at Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake provides on average 1.4 million megawatt- hours of electricity to the California power grid annually, enough power for 180,000 homes. The China Lake plant was built using a public-private venture business model. 6

7 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Efficiency and Demand Reduction DON is a leader in Federal use of financed energy contracts Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) Utility Energy Service Contracts (UESCs) Since 2008, Navy has implemented 70 ESPCs and 275 UESCs DON has implemented $1.4B of life-cycle efficiency improvements Reduced energy intensity (power per square foot – MBtu/KSF) by -16.9% relative to 2003 Navy baseline toward goal of -18% at end of FY11 Projects should match or beat life-cycle costs for brown power within the regional market Strategy includes concentrating on reducing energy consumption through the award of energy efficiency projects while simultaneously pursuing financed renewable energy projects 7

8 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Navy Shore Energy Strategy Energy Efficiency Renewable Energy & Sustainability ENERGY SECURITY & COMPLIANCE Navy Energy Culture Energy Efficiency First (OPNAV) Transform Navy From Culture of Consumption to Culture of Conservation Through Transparency and Accountability The Right Technology at the Right Time - Watch - Partner - Lead Energy Security: - Redundancy - Resiliency - Reliability “Compliance” is unique to the Shore 8

9 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Energy Pyramid Pyramid Penn State University 9

10 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Technology o Controls o Magnetically levitated centrifugal compressors o LED lighting, induction lighting o Insulation, solar hot water o More efficient chillers, glazing, plumbing fixtures o Metering and smart grid Cost/Benefit o Building lifecycle > 67 years o Maintenance cost on specialty items particularly important o Limited ability to source select o Economic difference within region: Key West, GTMO Technology 10

11 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Design Standards Primary Standards o Unified Facilities Criteria o International Building Code 2009 o Anti –Terrorism Force Protection (ATFP), UFC o USGBC LEED Gold o ASHRE o Whole Building Design Guide Individual base requirements: IAP, Force Protection, Airfield criteria, etc Source selection for Design Build often evaluates design approach for best value: TOC and mission viability Competing priorities – Energy, ATFP, Environmental, Cost require thoughtful design 11

12 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast SE Industry Energy Partnership – Energy partnership forum is held to introduce new technology and solutions that we can integrate into facilities maintenance and construction projects – By partnering with industry, we leverage their expertise to meet our energy reduction and security goals – New technologies should be submitted to NAVFAC Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center (805)

13 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast CNRSE Installation Awards 13

14 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Energy Reduction Progress 2003 Baseline Where we need your help Our challenge 14

15 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Energy Funding Average Base goes from ~$3M/ YR to ~$11M/ YR in Direct Energy Investment Total FY Investment ($M) PB 12 FY 12 Energy Program ~ $781M PB 11 FY 11 Energy Program ~ $238M 15

16 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast PB13 FY13 – Total Energy Funding OMN ~ $ 396M 3 rd Party Financing ~ $120M LEED w MILCON ~ $60M ECIP~ $23M Geotherm. ~ $9M eMMRP ~ $41M PB 13 FY 13 Energy Program ~ $650M Average Base = $9.3M/ YR in Direct Energy Investment 16

17 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Energy Project Types and Fundi ng (current and projected) RMe – CNIC’s Energy Special Projects Program FY12 $220M (26 $12M = 6%) FY13 $325M (56 $56M = 18%) FY14 $210M projected (51 $24M = 12%) FY15 $215M projected (Projects due to CNIC on 18 Nov 2012) FY16 $225M projected ECIP – Energy Conservation Investment Program FY12 $23M ($15M) FY13 $43M ($2M) FY14 To be announced FY15 Projects submitted to CNIC on 15 Aug 2012 UESC/ESPC Annual financed payments of $11M from UT Budget Three projects in FY12 ($11M) Navy goal of $300M in FY12/13 eROI Tool 17

18 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Energy Contracts FY12 Contract TypeScopeLocation of Work Contract Capacity/ Duration Type Projected IFB/RFP Projected Award Date eSRM: Energy Conservation Retro-CommissioningCBC Gulfport$0.5M Small Bus. FY12, Q1 FY12, Q2 ControlsCBC Gulfport NAS Pensacola NAVO Stennis NS Mayport $4.2MFY12, Q1 Lighting UpgradesNAS Corpus Christi NAS Pensacola $2.1MFY12, Q1 HVAC UpgradesNAS Corpus Christi NAS Pensacola NAS Key West NAS Kingsville NAS Whiting Field NS Mayport NAS Meridian $3.8MFY12, Q1 Misc. Energy ConservationNS Mayport NAS Corpus Christi NAS Kingsville NAS Pensacola NAS Meridian $1.7MFY12, Q1 ECIPSolar LED Street LightsNS GTMO$1.8MMACCFY12, Q4 Building Energy AuditsVarious Locations$3.0MSCANFY12, Q1 TOTAL $17.1M 18

19 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Energy Contracts FY13 (projected) Contract TypeScopeLocation of Work Contract Capacity/ Duration Type Projected IFB/RFP Projected Award Date Energy Conservation (RMe, ECIP) Retro-CommissioningNAS Pensacola NAS Jacksonville NAS Meridian NAS Corpus Christi NAS Kingsville NAVSTA GTMO NAS Key West NSA Panama City $6.8M/ 1YR Small Bus. (Does not include GTMO projects) FY13, Q1 FY13, Q1/Q2 Controls (DDC)NAS Meridian NAS Jacksonville NAS JRB New Orleans $2.2M/ 1 YR FY13, Q1 Lighting Upgrades (Building, Street, Airfield) NAS Pensacola NAS Jacksonville NAVSTA GTMO NAS Key West $25.1M/ 1 YR FY13, Q1 HVAC UpgradesNAS Jacksonville CBC Gulfport NAS Pensacola NAS Key West NS Mayport NAS Meridian NSA Panama City NSA Orlando $18.2M/ 1 YR FY13, Q1 Solar ThermalNSA Panama City SUBASE Kings Bay $2.7M/ 1 YR FY13, Q1 Misc. Energy Conservation (Bldg envelope, Water, Boiler) NS Mayport NAS Pensacola $3.0M/ 1 YR FY13, Q1 TOTAL $58M 19

20 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast eROI Tool Overview What is eROI? eROI is ratio of PV of total benefits over PV of total cost. Provides a consistent, quantifiable approach to prioritize energy projects that create value, using criteria that includes “hard” benefits, such as cost savings, as well as “soft” benefits, such as meeting stakeholder expectations. eROI = (Present Value of Benefit) (Present Value of Cost) Why is eROI useful? Using a weighted criteria approach, eROI tool enables Navy to rank and compare hundreds of energy projects submitted by installations, then invest in projects that deliver best ROI. Navy-wide optimized portfolio of energy projects and investments, created by this tool, positions Navy to achieve its energy consumption goal with efficient use of resources. 20

21 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast 1 Gigawatt Initiative State of the Union (24JAN12 ): Navy Will Purchase “Enough Capacity to Power a Quarter of a Million Homes a Year” – 250K Homes = 1 GW of Power (~Honolulu, Orlando, Jackson, MS) – Coso Geothermal Plant ~270MW capacity 180MW current output of Coso Geothermal Plant provides power for approximately 120K homes (average load of 1.5KW per home) Draft 1 GW Task Force Charter – Assigns membership, roles/responsibilities to Secretariat, Navy & Marine Corps Echelon I & II commands – Focus primarily on larger projects using third party financing – Finalize the “Strategy” in

22 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast SECNAV Goal: 50% net-zero installations by FY20 – SECNAV Instruction of 3 Feb 12 defines a Netzero Installation as: “A DON Installation which, over the course of a fiscal year, matches or exceeds the electrical energy it consumes ashore with electrical energy generated from alternative or renewable energy sources. The alternative fuel generated electrical energy may be: 1) generated on the installation; or 2) generated off the installation but purchased for and consumed on the installation.” Determine which installations have the best opportunity to achieve net zero in the most cost effective way Determine what alternative energy projects to pursue at each installation based on NPV and ROI methodologies Net Zero Installations 22

23 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Net Zero Study Sites and Data provided by NAVFAC ESC –NAF El Centro, CA –NAS Fallon, NV –NS Guantanamo Bay, Cuba –NB Guam –NAS Key West, FL –NSB New London, CT –JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI –Pacific Missile Range Facility, HI –NS Rota, Spain –NB San Diego, CA  NREL providing primary support to NZEI planning and assessment.  Funding:  DOE provided initial start up for NREL REO analysis for many Navy and Marine Corps Installations.  CNIC provided additional funds to complete the NREL REO analysis for all installations as well as to conduct site visits to installations to validate the REO data and other related work  USMC also using NREL to conduct site visits to validate the REO data and other related work  Objective: develop cost effective strategy to achieve SECNAV goal of 50% of installations to be NZEI by 2020  Approach  High level pre-screen of all bases for renewable energy opportunities  Select most cost effective sites for more in depth analysis (site visits)  Outcome: develop budget estimates for implementation for next POM cycle  Current Status: Navy/Marines-NREL Interagency Agreement approved in last month and now moving out 23

24 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Evaluated for the following renewables: – Wind – Solar (PV (photovoltaic), thermal and hot water) – Biomass gasification boiler – Solar ventilation preheating – Day lighting Technologies not evaluated: – Waste-to–energy (to be added for future screenings) – Geothermal (to be added for installations that have potential) – Landfill gas (to be added to future screenings) Technologies Evaluated 24

25 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast NREL’s REO Screening Tool NREL’s REO tool is an early planning tool used to evaluate renewable energy options, estimate costs, and recommend a mix of technologies that meets the site’s energy goals REO aggregates energy systems data such as electric and thermal energy use, utility rates, incentives, and RE resource data REO results allow agencies to quickly and efficiently prioritize RE opportunities Costs, incentives, and other assumptions can change quickly REO is often used as part of the iterative project development process REO helps to inform project development and prioritize resources, but the results do not represent the final exact answer More detailed analysis is required prior to making project investment decisions 25

26 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Results are NOT Conclusive This is the beginning of a multi-phased planning and analytical process involving the following stages 1) Preliminary screening (resource identification) 2) Exploration (resource verification) 3) Viability analysis (technology readiness levels) 4) Feasibility analysis (economic conditions) 5) Suitability analysis (siting and permitting – operational/environmental/land use compatibility) This REO analysis addresses portions of the first four phases above Site visits and follow-on efforts required to complete the first four phases Suitability analysis (phase 5) will be completed for viable sites after phases 1-4 Projects will be developed for viable sites after phase 5 26

27 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast DoN Smart Power Partnership Initiative (SPPI) Group DoN installations into regional smart grids (at DoN FCAs) –Regional (DoN) real time visibility/monitoring of external supply, internal generation, utility systems, energy use (bldgs/systems) –Aggregate load and generation; participate in/establish incentive programs (i.e. Demand Response); move renewable power through the market (virtual wheeling) from point of generation to point of use –Define essential smart/micro grid capabilities and develop an ROI plus energy security based methodology to prioritize investments “Power Partnerships” with internal and external stakeholders –Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs), Independent System Operators (ISOs), Public Utility Commissions (PUCs), Energy Service Providers (ESPs), Direct Access Cooperatives (Western, Southwestern, Southeastern, Bonneville Power), Local Utility, etc. –Indentify and prioritize critical power requirements –Identify and prioritize deferrable/discretionary loads –Develop Pre-Planned Responses, Load Shedding Plans and Plans for Continuity of Critical Power 27

28 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Navy Smart Energy Background There have been a number of innovations recently towards a concept known as “Navy Smart Energy.” Norfolk Naval Station UEM OT-IC Project Study Smart Energy Project Development Studies (26 sites): SW, ML and MW Smart Power Partnership Initiative (SPPI) Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) NDW Energy Vision and Smart Energy CONOPS NDW Smart Grid NW Energy and Utility Operations Center and Integrated ICS A number of centralized Industrial Control Systems (ICS)  SW Area Wide Energy Management System (central DDC and SCADA)  Dahlgren and Little Creek central DDC  Kings Bay SCADA And a number of studies/proposals are underway that further the concept. These innovations and continued progress on the concept have led to interest in the possible benefits of a corporate wide approach. Operation Centers 28

29 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Smart Energy Defined The objectives are savings and energy reduction through specific actions. Integrated System of Industrial Controls: DDC, SCADA, AMI Active Facility Management (ICS:DDC) ICS:SCADA (improved reliability, energy security) Identification of Energy Efficiency Opportunities (analytics leading to project development) Actionable Stakeholder Metrics (tenant awareness) Enhanced Demand Response (cost Reduction, grid support, SPPI) Predictive Maintenance opportunities Objective/Results Actions Analysis / Diagnosis Data/Status Results  What overall objectives does Navy want to accomplish? Actions  What key actions will help accomplish this? Analysis  What key information does Navy need to support the actions? Data  What critical raw data is needed to develop the analysis? Approach The Smart Energy is a data-driven process targeted to specific objectives. 29

30 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Energy: The Key Element We can create a more sustainable, cleaner and safer world by making wiser energy choices. – Robert Alan Renewable Energy Non-renewable Energy Commodity Production & Distribution Customers Monitoring Monitoring is the key to knowing where and how commodity usage may be reduced. All commodity usage consumes energy. EMS/DDC SCADA AMI reporting & policycontrol & sensing behavior change Operations Centers Corporate 30

31 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Navy Smart Energy Integrating Across the Enterprise via NMCI Program Drivers SECNAV Energy Mandates Legislative Requirements (e.g. EPACT 2005) Budget Constraints Executive Orders Navy / USMC Mission AMI CIRCUITS Defense Information System Agency Operation Centers Data Consumer Navy / USMC Facilities (HVAC & Lighting) Control Sensors Control Sensors Time of Use Power Quality Utility Usage DDC & SCADA Historical Data Meta Data Building Managers Discovery DoDD NetCentric Data Strategy Data Acquisition & Integration Meter Data Management (MDM) via PSNET Navy / USMC Installation Energy Managers DDCSCADA Smart Power Partnership Power Industry (e.g. Utility Supplier & Regulators) DoN Corporate Navy / USMC Utilities (Microgrid) Navy /USMC Region $$ DoN Smart Power Cluster DoN Benefits Energy Security Behavior Change Real-Time Energy Management Customer Visibility into Usage Utility Cost Saving Energy Awareness Demand Response Load Balancing Improved Efficiency Integration of Renewables Accurate Billing Loss Identification Meets Regulatory Requirements Enterprise Benchmarking Improved Customer Satisfaction Predictive Maintenance Reduced Metering Overhead Fault Prediction Production & Distr. Control Enhanced Safety DoN Target Cluster Areas Navy / USMC Installation Authors: Chet Braun & Eric Lynch Last Update: 10/19/

32 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast DDC, SCADA and AMI devices treated equivalently Data point aggregation allows for reorganization Operator screens may display any information in any format, independent of vendor software SCADA & DDC Control Integrated System of Industrial Controls Commodity Production, Distribution and Consumption Collection of ICS Devices AMI Meters 32

33 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Questions? 33


Download ppt "NAVFAC SOUTHEAST Navy Energy Program and Initiatives LCDR J. Doug Herrin, P.E., C.E.M. October 4, 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google