Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Rev A Antti Miettinen 07.12.20041 H.248 Gateway Control Protocol Signaling Traffic Related Protocol Analysis Antti Miettinen S-38.310 Thesis Seminar on.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Rev A Antti Miettinen 07.12.20041 H.248 Gateway Control Protocol Signaling Traffic Related Protocol Analysis Antti Miettinen S-38.310 Thesis Seminar on."— Presentation transcript:

1 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Gateway Control Protocol Signaling Traffic Related Protocol Analysis Antti Miettinen S Thesis Seminar on Networking Technology Helsinki University of Technology

2 Rev A Antti Miettinen Basic Information Thesis written at Oy L M Ericsson Ab, Finland Supervisor: Professor Jorma Jormakka Instructors: M.Sc. Juha Eloranta

3 Rev A Antti Miettinen Contents Background Problem Description Objectives Scope UMTS Release 5 Network H.248 Gateway Control Protocol H.248 Protocol Traffic Analysis Protocol Traffic Analyzers Conclusion and Future Work

4 Rev A Antti Miettinen Background (1/3) The Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) is a third generation mobile network standard specified by the 3 rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) UMTS network is developed from the GSM and GPRS UMTS specifications and features grouped into releases Each release contains specific functionalities and advancements Releases enable vendors to make interoperable networks

5 Rev A Antti Miettinen Background (2/3) The UMTS Release 4 network architecture introduced the layered network architecture –Call control is separated from the media and bearer control H.248 Gateway Control Protocol framework (GCP) is used in the UMTS core network between the Media Gateway Controller (MGC) and the Media Gateway (MGW) and between the Media Resource Function Controller (MRFC) and Media Resource Function Processor (MRFP).

6 Rev A Antti Miettinen Background (3/3) This means: –The MGC and the MRFC handles the call control while the MGW and the MRFP handles the media and the bearer control. –The MGC and MRFC steer and control the calls through the MGW and the MRFP with help of the GCP

7 Rev A Antti Miettinen Problem Description The GCP traffic analysis has an essential role in troubleshooting the network anomalies By analyzing the GCP traffic, the past status and the prevailing operations of the network node can be revealed However, the GCP messages are big and frequent. Thus, the protocol traffic analysis is a heavy process. The research problem of this thesis is to find out an efficient method to analyze the GCP protocol traffic to troubleshoot the network nodes

8 Rev A Antti Miettinen Objectives The objective of this study is to find out efficient methods to analyze the H.248 Gateway Control Protocol signaling traffic to be able to troubleshoot the network nodes efficiently.

9 Rev A Antti Miettinen Scope Different methods to efficiently analyze the H.248 protocol traffic are explored. Those methods are mapped to protocol traffic analyzer requirements. Only open source analyzers are explored –The source code is available => modifications to the analyzer can be done to meet the requirements better –No license fees –Commercial products do not distribute fully functional demo versions => no real evaluation can be done An protocol traffic analyzer is selected as a recommendation for the H.248 protocol traffic analysis

10 Rev A Antti Miettinen UMTS Release 5 Network AuC BSC BSS BTS CN CS EIR GGSN GMSC HLR ME MGW MS MSC PS PSTN RNC RNS SGSN SIM USIM VLR Authentication Centre Base Station Controller Base Station System Base Transceiver Station Core Network Circuit Switched Equipment Identity Register Gateway GPRS Support Node Gateway Mobile Switching Centre Home Location Register Mobile Equipment Media Gateway Mobile Station Mobile Switching Centre Packet Switched Public Switched Telephone Network Radio Network Controller Radio Network Subsystem Serving GPRS Support Node Subscriber Identity Module User Services Identity Module Visitor Location Register

11 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Gateway Control Protocol (1/5) Connection model –The most important abstractions are the Contexts, Terminations and Streams T1 T2 T3 Context1 T1 T2 T3 Context2 MGW T1 T2 T3 Context3 = a stream = the direction of a media flow Tx = termination x

12 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Gateway Control Protocol (2/5) Message structure –GCP message has a modular structure Transaction1 GCP message Action1 Command1Command2 Action3 Command1Command2 Command3Command4 Action2 Transaction2 Action1 Command1 TopologyDescriptor MediaDescriptor

13 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Gateway Control Protocol (3/5) Messages –Large when presented in human readable form –Transaction request (easily >100 lines) bigger than transaction repliesTransaction request transaction replies Replies do not usually contain descriptors Signaling traffic asymmetric –Treelike hierarchy Transactions Actions Commands Descriptors

14 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Gateway Control Protocol (4/5) Possible errors situations 1.H packet defines 60 different error descriptor e.g. “Unknown TerminationID”, error code 430 or “insufficient bandwidth”, error code 526. Network node might end up to an unspecified state (the failed command remains half executed) Must be taken into account when searching reasons for network node anomalies

15 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Gateway Control Protocol (5/5) Possible errors situations (cont.) 2.Unclosed transactions May realize in case of unreliable signaling connection GCP specifies the three timers to prevent this but they are not 100% sure

16 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Protocol Traffic Analysis (1/3) Data Presentation Format –“Overview first, zoom and filter, then details-on-demand”, Ben Shneiderman –The call related parameters should be shown in their own columns in the overview part: transactionId, contextId, command type, terminationID and wildcard –Scroll bars, colored messages (e.g. error messages), colored barplots and tool tips

17 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Protocol Traffic Analysis (2/3) Filtering Functions –One of the most important features needed in troubleshooting Sorting Functions –Basic function –Implemented in every analyzer Monitoring Functions –Error descriptors in messages –Unclosed transactions

18 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Protocol Traffic Analysis (3/3) Summary Function –Shows the key information about the traffic, e.g. The number of transaction requests, replies and pendings The number of errored messages The number of completed and uncompleted transactions

19 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Protocol Traffic Analyzers (1/2) Only open source analyzers explored Examined analyzers: –TcpDump & WinDump –Ethereal –Analyzer –Packetyzer

20 Rev A Antti Miettinen H.248 Protocol Traffic Analyzers (2/2) Recommendation: –Ethereal Meets the requirements of the H.248 protocol traffic analysis best Actively developed Missing features: H.248 specific columns, monitoring functions, summary function, colored barplots

21 Rev A Antti Miettinen

22 Rev A Antti Miettinen Conclusion and Future Work Topics for future work: –Implement the missing requirements to Ethereal –Explore the commercial analyzers if they are even more suitable for the H.248 traffic analysis

23 Rev A Antti Miettinen Thank you! Questions or comments?


Download ppt "Rev A Antti Miettinen 07.12.20041 H.248 Gateway Control Protocol Signaling Traffic Related Protocol Analysis Antti Miettinen S-38.310 Thesis Seminar on."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google