Presentation on theme: "PRANITA NURMALINA, 2201404571 TEACHING WRITING PROCEDURE TEXT USING REAL THINGS (An Action Research Conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Randudongkal in the Academic."— Presentation transcript:
PRANITA NURMALINA, 2201404571 TEACHING WRITING PROCEDURE TEXT USING REAL THINGS (An Action Research Conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Randudongkal in the Academic Year of 2008/2009)
Identitas Mahasiswa - NAMA : PRANITA NURMALINA - NIM : 2201404571 - PRODI : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - JURUSAN : BAHASA & SASTRA INGGRIS - FAKULTAS : Bahasa dan Seni - EMAIL : pranitaluv pada domain yahoo.com - PEMBIMBING 1 : Prof. Dr. Warsono, M.A - PEMBIMBING 2 : Intan Permata H., S.Pd., M.Pd. - TGL UJIAN : 2009-08-12
Judul TEACHING WRITING PROCEDURE TEXT USING REAL THINGS (An Action Research Conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Randudongkal in the Academic Year of 2008/2009)
Abstrak Language learners usually find difficulties in writing. Students cannot write procedure text well because they lack knowledge of English grammar and vocabulary. They have limited memory so it is important for the teacher to create the activities before they express what they have in their mind. Due to their insufficient fluency and their boredom in learning English, teacher should have alternative ways to teach writing. This study is about teaching writing procedure text by using real things as the media to the seventh graders of SMP Negeri 1 Randudongkal in the academic year of 2008/2009. The objective of the study is to measure the effectiveness of using real things in teaching writing especially procedure text. In this study, the writer selected the media from real things relating to the subject matter. The research focused on teaching English writing especially procedure text by using real things. The writer took the seventh grade students of SMP N 1 Randudongkal as the subject of the study. In conducting this study, the writer collected data from the class by means of action research that was carried out through a pre-test, continued with two cycles of research, and ended with post-test. Based on the data analysis, the writer found that there was a significant difference of the result of the students’ pre-test and post-test. The result of the research shows that the students’ progress in mastering English writing especially writing procedure text is good. The average achievement of the students’ pre-test was 59.65%, post-test I was 70.52%, post-test II was 77.53%, post-test III was 82.23%. The main factor affecting this improvement is the students’ interest in the material given that is real things. Based on this study, the writer finds that teaching procedure writing by using real things is very beneficial for the students in order to facilitate them in writing. It is suggested that using real things in teaching writing in English especially writing procedure text should be recommended for the English teachers.
Kata Kunci A procedure writing, the real things, media, teaching procedure writing, action research
Referensi Arikunto, S.2002. Procedure Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta. Allwright, D. 1991. Focus in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Allwright, D. and C. M. Bailey. 1991. Focus on the Language Classroom: An Introduction to Classroom Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Atkinson, D. and C. N. Locatis. 1984. Media and Technology for Education and Training. USA: Bell and Howell Company. Brown, J.D. 1988. Understanding Research in Second Language Learning: A Teacher’s Guide to Statistic and Research Design Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Depdikbud. 1994. GBPP Muatan Local Sekolah Dasar Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Semarang: Kantor Wilayah Depdikbud Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Depdiknas. 2003. Kurikulum 2004: Standar Kompetansi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Elliot, J.1991. Action Research for Education Change. Philadelphia: Open University Press. Elliot, J. 1998. Action Research for Education Change. Philadelphia: Open University Press. Finocchiaro, M. 1974. English as a Second Language From Theory Practice. Ohio: Regents Publishing Co. Freez, S. and H. Joyce. 1989. Text-Based Syllabus Design. Australia: Macquire University. Geofrey, L. and Michael, S.H. 1981. Style in Fiction. A Linguistics Introduction to English Functional Prose. London and New York: Longman.