Presentation on theme: "Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 3: Conceptualization and construal operations, pt. 1."— Presentation transcript:
Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 3: Conceptualization and construal operations, pt. 1
3.1 Introduction Semantics is conceptualization (Langacker) All linguistic units evoke a semantic frame Human beings employ a variety of construal operations in language Examples: when a language has alternative expressions for the “same” situation (dad/father, spend/waste, leaves/foliage, lives/is living, etc.)
3.1 Introduction There is cross-linguistic and language-internal variation as to whether construal plus truth- conditional semantic shift is expressed covertly or overtly. Coercion – covert (not grammatically obligatory) expression of construal and semantic shift Conversion – overt (with grammatical markers) expression of construal and semantic shift Example: count vs. mass is covert (coercion) in English, but overt (conversion) in Russian: soloma ‘straw’ vs. solominka ‘a straw’; kričal ‘cried’ vs. kriknul ‘cried once’
3.1 Introduction Both coercion and conversion involve construal. Talmy, Langacker (and others) have explored the possible construal operations Image schemas impose a conceptualization of experience; they are “abstract” because they are schematic, but they are “not abstract” because they are embodied (see list on p. 45) – these relate to the possible (source) domains as well.
3.1 Introduction Croft&Cruse (p. 46) suggest a classification of construal operations : –Attention/Salience –Judgement/Comparison (identity) –Perspective/Situatedness –Constitution/Gestalt These are 4 basic cognitive abilities They are described in the remainder of the chapter
3.2 Attention/Salience Attention includes: –Selecting an object of attention –Having a focus of attention in a scope of attention –Selecting coarse or fine-grained attention –Fixing or shifting attention
3.2.1 Selection Selecting something = ignoring the rest This can involve selecting the appropriate facet or domain of a word (e.g., Paris as a location, government, or population)
3.2.1 Selection Q: What is metonymy? A: Selection of a different concept profile than the one usually symbolized by a word. The french fries is getting impatient.
3.2.2 Scope of attention (dominion) The scope of attention determines what is accessible to attention, what the search domain is. A reference point can determine the scope, as in the possessors in my watch, your anxiety, Lincoln’s assassination.
3.2.3 Scalar adjustment Q: What is a quantitative scalar adjustment?
3.2.3 Scalar adjustment Q: What is a quantitative scalar adjustment? A: An adjustment of how coarse or fine-grained a construal is (E.g., along the road, across the road, through the road)
3.2.3 Scalar adjustment Q: What is a qualitative scalar adjustment?
3.2.3 Scalar adjustment Q: What is a qualitative scalar adjustment? A: This is adjustment of attention along the range of schematicity, according to superordinate or subordinate categorization.
3.2.4 Dynamic attention Q: What is fictive motion?
3.2.4 Dynamic attention Q: What is fictive motion? A: Dynamic construal of a static scene, e.g., The road winds through the valley and then climbs over the high mountains.
3.2.4 Dynamic attention Q: What is the difference between sequential and summary scanning?
3.2.4 Dynamic attention Q: What is the difference between sequential and summary scanning? A: Sequential scanning sees something unfold through time (the bridge collapsed); summary scanning sees an event as a whole (the collapse of the bridge)
3.3 Judgement/comparison Comparison is a fundamental cognitive function, and has linguistic correlates in categorization, metaphor, and figure- ground alignment.
3.3.1 Categorization Categorization can involve full sanction – when an item is clearly a member of a category, or partial sanction – when a member is an extension of a category.
3.3.2 Metaphor Q: What is metaphor? A: Metaphor is a mapping between a source domain and a target domain.
3.3.3 Figure-ground alignment Q: What properties are usually associated with figure vs. ground?
3.3.3 Figure-ground alignment Q: What properties are usually associated with figure vs. ground? A: Figure is usually less known, smaller, more mobile, simpler, more salient, and more recent in awareness than ground. Linguistic realizations include main (figure) vs. subordinate (ground) clauses, prepositions.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.