Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance Prediction: Truths and Falsehoods Dr. Jordan B Peterson Professor of Psychology University of Toronto.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Performance Prediction: Truths and Falsehoods Dr. Jordan B Peterson Professor of Psychology University of Toronto."— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Prediction: Truths and Falsehoods Dr. Jordan B Peterson Professor of Psychology University of Toronto

2 What do psychologists do? Pursue scientific truth Pursue careers

3 How to pursue scientific truth MEASUREMENT – If the phenomenon cannot be measured It does not exist

4 How to pursue scientific truth, continued CONSTRUCT VALIDATION – Multimethod, multitrait Analogous to sensory analysis – Five senses, not one – Plus intrasubjective measurement – Plus technological extension of sensory analysis

5 Use statistics destructively Aim at demolishing your effect

6 How to pursue a career Invent a scale (or a construct) – Or rename a scale that already exists Refuse to validate it – No convergence – No divergence – No criterion – No multimethod, multitrait analysis Correlate it with some phenomenon

7 How to pursue a career, continued Publish the paper Establish a small primate dominance hierarchy – Based on the scale – Climb the hierarchy Use statistics selectively – Very selectively Enjoy the fruits of your success! – But seriously distort the knowledge base – And spend your time chasing red herrings

8 NATURE | NEWS FEATURE Replication studies: Bad copy – In the wake of high-profile controversies, psychologists are facing up to problems with replication. Ed Yong – 16 May 2012

9 Things that might not exist Self-esteem – (neuroticism – extraversion) – 25000 published papers Whole political and educational agendas Working memory and EF – IQ? Emotional intelligence – Agreeableness

10 Things that might not exist Grit MacArthur Genius Grant (Angela Duckworth) Martin Seligman (positive psychology) Conscientiousness Optimism/Pessimism – Extraversion/neuroticism Promotion/prevention – Extraversion/conscientiousness

11 Things that might not exist Empathy – Measures do not correlate well, but distill to agreeableness Psychopathy – Agreeableness, negative, minus conscientiousness – Predatory parasite

12 Things that might not exist Positive illusions – Extraversion, by Taylor’s own analysis Practical intelligence – Sternberg is a crook Multiple intelligences – Gardner is a crook

13 Things that might not exist Any questionnaire measure independent of the Big Five Any measure of cognitive function independent of IQ Any behavioral measure of a trait, independent of IQ and the Big Five

14 Things that might exist

15 Individual Differences Contextual and individual factors – Contextual Cultural factors Peer networks Social support – Individual Personality Cognitive ability

16 Personality

17 Traits Measurement Items Employment Variables Economic Value

18 Traits

19 STABILITY Emotional Stability Agreeableness Industriousness Orderliness Politeness Compassion Conscientiousness Volatility (r) Withdrawal (r)

20 PLASTICITY Extraversion Openness Assertiveness Enthusiasm Creativity Intellect

21 Personality Extraversion – Happiness, optimism, enthusiasm, gregariousness, assertiveness Neuroticism –.2-.3 with major life outcomes Particularly anxiety and depression, since that’s what it measures Agreeableness – Compliance, empathy, maternality, kinship – criminality Conscientiousness –.4 with major life outcomes Openness – Creativity, intelligence Disagreeable/neurotic – Personality disorders Gender differences – 75% classification accuracy

22 Emotion & Motivation Extraversion – Incentive reward (hope, curiosity, play, enthusiasm)/dopamine – Harvest attention/approach and exploit social situations Neuroticism – Pain, frustration, disappointment, fear, anxiety/GABA, Serotonin – Avoid threat, uncertainty and punishment Agreeableness – Empathy, sympathy, compliance, CARE (Oxytocin) – Form intimate relationships and share Vs – Pursue individual agenda/defend territory – People vs things Conscientiousness – Orderliness: DISGUST – Industriousness: GUILT, SHAME – Maintain order Stay uncontaminated and sparkly clean – Implement goals Openness – Manipulate abstractions prior to implementation – General Cognitive Ability – Awe, curiosity – Non-social incentive reward/dopamine

23 Models are grounded in motivation Capitalize on social groups Maintain order

24

25 Measurement

26 Items

27 Measurement Trait Measures Big Five Aspect Scale Unfakeable Big Five General cognitive ability Fluid Crystallized Dorsolateral prefrontal Creativity Creative Achievement Questionnaire Divergent thinking and fluency

28 (BFAS) Conscientiousness Industriousness – Waste my time (r) – Always know what I am doing Orderliness – Am not bothered by disorder (r) – Follow a schedule

29 (BFAS) Emotional Stability Volatility – Get angry easily – Keep my emotions under control Withdrawal – Seldom feel blue – Am filled with doubts about things

30 (BFAS) Agreeableness Politeness – Respect authority – Believe that I am better than others (r) Compassion – Am not interested in other people’s problems (r) – Take no time for others (r)

31 (BFAS) Openness Creativity – Believe in the importance of art – Love to reflect on things Intellect (but see general cognitive ability) – Am quick to understand things – Can handle a lot of information

32 (BFAS) Extraversion Assertiveness – Take charge – Lack the talent for influencing people (r) Enthusiasm – Make friends easily – Am hard to get to know (r)

33 Unfakeable Big Five (+)

34 Unfakeable Big Five (-)

35 Cognitive Ability The complexity of the world – Motivated ends must be met – Modeling of possibility prior to implementation Models generate solutions to three problems: – Where are you? – Where are you going? – How are you going to get there? – Allows testing and failure Popper: “Our hypotheses die in our stead”

36 Conceptions of cognitive ability – INTELLIGENCES – Practical vs analytical – Social, emotional, moral – Multiple: linguistic, musical, logical-mathematical, spatial, body-kinesthetic, intrapersonal, interpersonal – INTELLIGENCE – Highest strata has the most explanatory power » “g” measures “success” across broad domains » r ~.50

37

38 Effect Size Relative magnitude r=.50 90-97%ile r=.35-.50 75-90%ile r=.15-.35 25-57%ile r<.15 0-25%ile Hemphill, J.F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78-8. Binomial – Predictor r =.30 From 50/50 To 65/30 – Predictor r =.50 From 50/50 To 75/25

39 General Cognitive Ability

40 Creativity Visual Arts (painting, sculpture) 0. I have no training or talent in this area. 1. I have taken lessons in this area. 2. People comment on my talent in this area. 3. I won one or more prizes at juried art shows. 4. I showed my work in a gallery. 5. I sold a piece of my work. 6. My work was critiqued in local publications. 7. My work was critiqued in national publications. Inventions 0. I do not have recognized talent in this area. 1. I find novel uses for household objects. 2. I sketched out an invention and worked on its design flaws. 3. I created original software for a computer. 4. I built a prototype of one of my designed inventions. 5. I sold an inventions to people I know. 6. I received a patent for one of my inventions. 7. I sold an invention to a manufacturing firm. Creative Achievement Questionnaire

41 Employment Variables

42 Complexity Innovation Hi/Hi Entrepreneurial Lo/Hi Managerial/Administrative Lo/Lo Rote Tasks Hi/Lo

43 Who suits which position? Cognitive ability High levels of fluid and executive intelligence – Decision making and planning – Research High levels of retrieval – Creativity and ideational production – Leadership and public speaking High levels of crystallized intelligence – Information dispensing and storage – Writing and lecturing

44 Who suits which position? Specific Performance Openness (r =.30 -.40) – Associated with high levels of creativity/entrepreneurial ability – Extraversion (r =.20) » Managers » Sales People » Leadership – Agreeableness » Lower levels associated with creativity/managerial excellence » Higher levels for public relations, customer service (?)

45 Openness Complexity and Intelligence Innovation and Creativity

46 Conscientiousness Duty and Industriousness Disgust and Orderliness

47 Employment Variables II Emotional Stability High vs Low Stress Agreeableness People vs Things Extraversion Solitary vs Gregarious

48 Economic Value

49 Complexity and cognitive ability 95-86 percentile – IQ 130 – 116 85-73 percentile – IQ 115-110 Attorney, Research Analyst Editor, Advertising Manager Chemist, Engineer, Executive Manager, Trainee, Systems Analyst, Auditor Copywriter, Accountant Manager/Supervisor Sales Manager Sales, Programmer Analyst, Teacher, Adjuster General Manager Purchasing Agent Registered Nurse Sales Account Executive

50 Complexity and cognitive ability 70-60 percentile – IQ 108-103 55-50 percentile – IQ 102-100 Administrative Assistant Store Manager, Bookkeeper Credit Clerk. Drafter, Designer Lab Tester/Tech, Assistant Manager General Sales, Telephone Sales Secretary, Accounting Clerk, Medical Debt Collection Computer Operator Customer Service Rep Technician, Automotive Salesman Clerk, Typist Dispatcher, General Office Police Patrol Officer Receptionist, Cashier General Clerical Inside Sales Clerk, Meter Reader Printer, Teller, Data Entry Electrical Helper

51 Complexity and cognitive ability 45-42 percentile – IQ 98-95 37-21 percentile – IQ 93-87 Machinist, Food Dept Manager Quality Control Checker Claims Clerk, Driver/Deliveryman Security Guard, Unskilled Labor Maintenance, Machine Operator Arc Welder, Die Setter, Mechanic Medical/Dental Assistant Messenger, Factory Production Assembler, Food Service Worker Nurse’s Aide, Warehouseman Custodian/Janitor Material Handler Packer

52 Economic Value I Predictive Power r =.6 to r =.2 – Intelligence – Conscientiousness (managerial) – Openness Creativity (innovative) – Emotional Stability – Agreeableness – Extraversion

53 Economic Value II Binomial Effect Size Price’s Law Economic Impact of Prediction

54 Pareto Distribution

55 Individual variation and productivity

56 – Number of years – Current - Potential Predictor – Job Complexity High complexity = high variability – Salary Theoretically proportionate to output Average output must be 2x salary Economic value and placement

57

58 Process Advertise Test online Screen Interview best candidates

59

60 The Founder Institute is the world's largest entrepreneur training and startup launch program, helping aspiring founders across the globe build enduring technology companies.Founder Institute Based in Silicon Valley and with chapters across 35 countries, the Founder Institute has helped launch over 1,112 companies in 5 years. The company's mission is to "Globalize Silicon Valley" and build sustainable startup ecosystems that will create one million new jobs worldwide.

61 First, only roughly 30% of applicants are accepted to the program. Then, less than 40% of accepted Founders generally make it through the program to Graduation. To date, over 20,000 people have applied, and the Founder Institute can predict with 85% accuracy somebody's potential to become a successful technology entrepreneur.


Download ppt "Performance Prediction: Truths and Falsehoods Dr. Jordan B Peterson Professor of Psychology University of Toronto."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google