Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Insurance Institute of London ASG 228 Professional Indemnity Insurance.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Insurance Institute of London ASG 228 Professional Indemnity Insurance."— Presentation transcript:

1 Insurance Institute of London ASG 228 Professional Indemnity Insurance

2 Legal Background by Derek Tadiello 11 September 2001

3 “The one great principle of the English law is to make business for itself” (Charles Dickens: Bleak House)

4 Areas covered contract tort concurrent duties in contract & tort claims by non-contracting parties standard of care damages

5 limitation exclusion clauses contributory negligence failure to mitigate novus actus interveniens remoteness betterment Limits on recovery

6 Contract deeds & simple contracts 3 basic elements –offer and acceptance –an intention to be legally bound –consideration (except deeds) form - written, oral or mixture express and implied terms

7 Tort 4 requirements –existence of a duty of care –a breach of that duty –damage caused by the breach –foreseeability

8 Cases Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 Hedley Byrne v Heller 1964 Dutton v Bognor Regis UDC 1972 Anns v LB of Merton 1978 Junior Books v Veitchi 1982 Peabody v Sir Lindsay Parkinson 1985 D&F Estates v Church Commissioners 1989 Murphy v Brentwood DC 1991

9 Ross v Caunters 1979 White v Jones 1993 Arbuthnott v Fagan & Feltrim 1994/ Henderson v Merrett 1995

10 Concurrent duties in contract and tort Midland Bank v Hett Stubbs & Kemp 1979 Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Bank 1986 Lancashire Churches v Howard Seddon 1991 Henderson v Merrett 1994 Wessex RHA v HLM Design 1994 Holt v Payne Skillington 1995

11 Claims by non-contracting parties St Martins v Sir Robert McAlpine 1993 Darlington BC v Wiltshier 1995 Panatown v Alfred McAlpine 2000 Baxall Securities v Sheard Walshaw 2000

12 Contracts (Rights of Third Parties Act (1999) statutory exception to rule of privity of contract applies to contracts entered into after May 2000 enables a third party to enforce the terms of a contract to which it is not a party if: –contract states he may do so, or –contract purports to confer a benefit on him

13 Standard of care Bolam v Friern Hospital 1957 Whitehouse v Jordan 1981 Wilsher v Essex Area HA 1988 Bolitho v City & Hackney HA 1997 Gloucester HA v Torpy 1997 Matrix-Securities v Theodore Goddard 1997 Balamoan v Holden 1999 David Bond v Sun Alliance 2001

14 Damages Contract & tort pecuniary and non-pecuniary must be reasonable as between parties Ruxley v Forsyth 1995 inconvenience, discomfort & distress Bailey v Bullock, 1950 Perry v Sidney Phillips 1982, Watts v Morrow 1991

15 Hartle v Laceys 1999 Farley v Skinner 2000

16 Limitation periods Personal injury - 3 years contract - 6 or 12 years from breach tort –6 years from damage, or if later –3 years from discovery or reasonable discoverability –cut-off 15 years from last act of negligence

17 Deliberate concealment S32(1)(b) “where any fact….is deliberately concealed…by the defendant, the limitation period runs from the date the claimant discovered or could have discovered the concealment” S32(2) “a deliberate commission of a breach of professional duty in circumstances in which it is unlikely to be discovered for some time amounts to deliberate concealment of the facts involved in that breach of duty”

18 Brocklesby v Armitage 1999 Liverpool RC v David Goldberg QC Cave v Robinson Jarvis & Rolfe 2001

19 Contributory Negligence Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 Basildon DC v J E Lesser Properties 1985 Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v Butcher 1986 Barclays Bank v Fairclough 1995

20 Failure to mitigate Novus Actus Interveniens Remoteness –Hadley v Baxendale 1854 –Victoria Laundry v Newnam 1949 –The Heron II 1969 –Parsons v Uttley Ingham 1978

21 Betterment Philips v Ward 1956 Harbutt’s Plasticene v Wayne Tank 1970 Richard Roberts v Douglas Smith Stimson 1989 Victoria University v Hugh Wilson 1985 Imperial College v Norman & Dawbarn 1986

22 Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 Where two or more wrongdoers are responsible for the same damage, the Court may apportion damages between them on a just and equitable basis liability of parties may be breach of contract, statute or in tort.

Download ppt "Insurance Institute of London ASG 228 Professional Indemnity Insurance."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google