1. Commercial Law Guy Harley  Bachelor of Law (University of Adelaide – 1978)  Barrister and Solicitor in Adelaide for 18 years  Master of Business (eBusiness) (University of SA 2001)  IT Directorate, University of Western Sydney  Contact Information  (02) 4570 1116  guy@harley.net.au  Web Site  http://www.harley.net.au

2. Commercial Law Negotiable Instruments

3. Commercial Law Negotiable Instruments  Enables a creditor to transfer a right to be paid to a third party  Holder of negotiable instrument can seek payment directly from debtor  Third party may transfer negotiable instrument to another

4. Commercial Law Negotiability  System of payment designed to eliminate  the difficulties and risks involved in having large sums of cash, gold or silver always and immediately available and  problems with transporting these items over what were often dangerous distances.  Grew out of Merchant practice  Later codified in statute (Bill of Exchange Act).

5. Commercial Law Seller Buyer Clearing House BillAccept Transfer Bill Payment (on due date) Payment 1 2 3 4 5

6. Commercial Law Seller Buyer Clearing House Bill of Exchange Transfer Bill Payment Clearing House Transfer Bill Payment

7. Commercial Law Characteristics  Title capable of transfer by mere delivery (or where payable “to order”, by endorsement and then delivery)  No requirement for notice of transfer to be given to person liable.  Holder can sue in his/her name.  Holder who takes in good faith and for value takes it free of defects and may obtain better title than transferor.  A presumption of bona fides and consideration.

8. Commercial Law Transferable  All negotiable instruments transferable  bills of exchange  Cheques  bearer debentures  promissory notes  some bonds

9. Commercial Law Transferable (cont.)  Not all things transferable are negotiable  share certificates  money orders  IOUs

10. Commercial Law Financing  As well as payment method, extensive use in  liquidity management (ability to discount) and  financing (commercial bill acceptance)

11. Commercial Law Commercial Bill Acceptance Facility  KD Morris & Sons Ltd (In Liq) v. Bank of Queensland Ltd (1980) 146 CLR 165  In 1973 Keith Morris Construction Ltd group was Queensland’s largest building contractor. A subsidiary KD Morris & Sons Pty Ltd needed $2m. Bank of Queensland and Tricontinental agreed to provide Co with commercial bill acceptance facilities of $1m each.  The Company would draw bills payable in 180 days which it could immediately discount with Tricontinental providing the Company with cash to the value of the bills less discount. Each 180 days the bills would be “rolled over”, meaning new bills would take the place of those retired on maturity.

12. Commercial Law Commercial Bill Acceptance Facility  Method had advantage to Bank that it involved no actual advance of funds. Instead the money came from the discounter, Tricontinental and ultimately other operators in the commercial bill market to whom Tricontinental might in turn discount the bills.  The Bank supplied ready acceptability of the Company’s bills in the market place i.e. credit enhancement. It added its name.  In this case, security was required (land) but not always so if credit rating (often dependent on strong cash flow and debt service ability) sufficient.

13. Commercial Law Types of Negotiable Instrument  Bill of Exchange  Cheque  Promissory note

14. Commercial Law Bill Of Exchange  Can be drawn on anyone  Often used for international transactions  Does not use crossings  Accepted by party on whom drawn

15. Commercial Law A Cheque is  Drawn only on a financial institution  Mostly for commercial transactions within a country  Payable on demand  Financial institution pays because of banker/customer relationship rather than acceptance

16. Commercial Law Promissory Note  Bilateral legal relationship and not tripartite  Unconditional promise rather than unconditional order

17. Commercial Law Cheques  Most common form of Bill of Exchange  Now outside Bills Of Exchange Act  Originally covered by Bills of Exchange Act  Now covered by Cheques Act 1986

18. Commercial Law Definition of a Cheque (s. 10) 1)A cheque is an UNCONDITIONAL ORDER IN WRITING that; a)Is addressed by a person to another person (being a FINANCIAL INSTITUTION) b)Is signed by the person giving it and c)Requires the FINANCIAL INSTITUTION to pay ON DEMAND A SUM CERTAIN in money 2)An instrument that does not comply with subsection (1) or that orders any act to be done in addition to the payment of money, is not a cheque.

19. Commercial Law Definition of a Cheque  Must be unconditional  Must be signed  A person who signs adopts all the writing on the cheque  Bondina Ltd v Rolloway Shower Blinds Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 517  Must be mandatory and not just an authorisation or request to pay (s11)  Order to pay on a contingency is not unconditional (s12)

20. Commercial Law Definition of a Cheque (cont.)  Must be addressed to a financial institution (s13)  Must require payment on demand (s14)  Must be to pay a certain sum of money  Use of rates of exchange permissible (s15)  Merely setting out a formula is not enough if precise sum cannot be calculated by reference to the cheque (Rosenhain v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1922) 31 CLR 46)

21. Commercial Law Cheques – Definitions  Financial institution (s13)  Order (s11)  Unconditional order to pay (s12)  Order addressed to a financial instituion (s13)  Order to pay on demand (s14)  Order to pay a sum certain (s15)

22. Commercial Law FINANCIAL INSTITUTION means: a)The Reserve Bank of Australia; or b)An authorised deposit-taking institution) under the Banking Act 1959; or c)An FIC institution; or d)A State Banks; or e)A Foreign Bank

23. Commercial Law FIC INSTITUTION means A building society; or A credit union; or A special services provider Under a Financial Institutions Code

24. Commercial Law Order to pay (s11)  An order to pay must be more than an authorization or request to pay.

25. Commercial Law Unconditional order to pay (s12) 1)An order to pay on a contingency is not an unconditional order to pay and the happening of the event does not make the order an unconditional order to pay. 2)An order to pay shall not be taken not to be an unconditional order to pay by reason only that the order is coupled with either or both of the following: a)An indication of a particular account to be debited by the financial institution to which the order is addressed; b)A statement of the transaction giving rise to the order

26. Commercial Law Addressed to a Financial Institution (s13) 1)An order to pay is not addressed to a financial institution unless: a)The order is addressed to a financial institution and to no other person; b)the order is addressed to one financial institution only; and c)the financial institution is named, or otherwise indicated with reasonable certainty, in the instrument containing the order.

27. Commercial Law Addressed to a Financial Institution (s13) 2)An order to pay may be an order to pay addressed to a financial institution notwithstanding that a person other than the financial institution on which the instrument containing the order is drawn, the payee or the drawer is specified in the instrument.

28. Commercial Law Order to Pay on Demand (s14) 1)Subject to subsections (2) and (3), an order to pay is an order to pay on demand if: a)the order is expressed to require payment on demand, at sight or on presentation; or b)no time for payment is expressed in the instrument containing the order.

29. Commercial Law Order to Pay on Demand (s14) (cont.) 2)Subject to subsection 16(3), an order to pay is not an order to pay on demand if the order is expressed to require, or requires by implication, payment otherwise than on demand, at sight or on presentation.

30. Commercial Law Order to Pay on Demand (s14) (cont.) 3)Without limiting the generality of subsection (2), an order to pay is not an order to pay on demand if the order is expressed to require, or requires by implication, payment only: a)at or before a particular time; or b)where the instrument containing the order is presented at or before a particular time.

31. Commercial Law Order to Pay a Sum Certain (S15) 1)Subject to subsection (2), an order to pay is not an order to pay a sum certain unless the sum ordered to be paid is specified with reasonable certainty in the instrument containing the order. 2)Where more than one sum is expressed to be payable in an instrument containing an order to pay, the lesser or least, as the case may be, of the sums so expressed to be payable shall be taken to be the only sum ordered to be paid by the instrument.

32. Commercial Law Order to Pay a Sum Certain (S15) (3)An order to pay may be an order to pay a sum certain notwithstanding that the order requires a sum to be paid according to a rate of exchange specified in, or to be ascertained as directed by, the instrument containing the order.

33. Commercial Law Order to Pay a Sum Certain (S15) 4)Where an instrument contains: a)an order to pay a specified sum; and b)an order to pay not more than a specified sum; the instrument shall be taken to require payment of the lesser of the sums so specified.

34. Commercial Law Date  A cheque is deemed to have been drawn on the date appearing on it (s16) but is not invalid if:  No date; or  Antedated; or  Post dated

35. Commercial Law Incomplete Cheques  If a cheque is signed but otherwise blank in one or more fields then  Person to whom cheque is delivered is presumed to have authority to complete the cheque in any way they deem fit (s18(1))

36. Commercial Law Incomplete Cheques  Holder in due course has no claim against drawer or persons who indorsed cheque prior to it being filled in unless  Completed within a reasonable time; and  In accordance with the limits of any authority given (s18(2))  Holder in due course has a valid claim against person who completed cheque and indorsees after cheque completed

37. Commercial Law Terms  Drawer – Indorsee - Holder in due Course DrawerIndorseeHolder in due course Cheque Payment Claims

38. Commercial Law Specification of Payee or Indorsee (S19) 1)A person shall not be taken to be specified in a cheque as payee or indorsee unless the person: a)Is named or otherwise indicated with reasonable certainty, in the cheque: and b)Is not a fictitious or non-existing person

39. Commercial Law Specification of Payee or Indorsee (S19) 2)Where the holder for the time being of an office is specified in a cheque as payee or indorsee, the person who is the holder for the time being of the office shall be taken to be named in the cheque as payee or indorsee, as the case may be.

40. Commercial Law NOT a Payee or Indorsee When:  A fictitious person  A non-existing person  Reference is too obscure or uncertain