Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

After Modernity Fall 2010. Outline Marx, Weber, Durkheim’s subject matter Grand Theory – Science, structuralism, Principia, Taylorism, Fordism Contra-Grand.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "After Modernity Fall 2010. Outline Marx, Weber, Durkheim’s subject matter Grand Theory – Science, structuralism, Principia, Taylorism, Fordism Contra-Grand."— Presentation transcript:

1 After Modernity Fall 2010

2 Outline Marx, Weber, Durkheim’s subject matter Grand Theory – Science, structuralism, Principia, Taylorism, Fordism Contra-Grand Theory – Conflict – Self-contradiction – Incompleteness and impossibility theorems Post-modern Theories

3

4 From Pre-Modernity to Modernity Tradition, convention, prejudice, superstition Industrialization Nation-state Market economy Democracy Rational, calculation, universalism, innovation, science, planning, problem solving, systems, control, society

5

6 Scenes of horror, that we may never forget

7

8 From Pre-Modernity to Modernity Tradition, convention, prejudice, superstition Industrialization Nation-state Market economy Democracy Rational, calculation, universalism, innovation, science, planning, problem solving, systems, control, society No foundation internal contradictions same as it ever was

9 Limits of Reason Social constructionism Garbage can theory Bounded rationality Anxiety of influence (Bloom) Bricolage (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bricolage)

10 Dichotomy View ModernPostmodern Necessity (natural and social laws)Contingency or chance Universality (across time and space) Locality and the particular (can only know own experience) Certainty and predictabilityUncertainty and provisionality Truth and realityCritique of tradition-bound analysis Transparency or understandabilityUndecidability Order of nature and structuresAmbivalence of human design After http://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htm after Bauman p.398http://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htm

11 Four Issues Identity Politics Differences Reflexivity After http://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htmhttp://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htm

12 Identity From: social world can be modeled as “individuals in groups” with both individuals and groups having stable “identity” – I/me, the Germans, women, the poor To: identity as not unambiguously defined, shifting over time, generally unstable. Local circumstances and experiences important in shaping these identities. – Thus: class, ethnic groups, or status groups may not “exist” – Theories based on them may not be useful – Shared situation (class, race) may be construct imposed by theorists After http://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htmhttp://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htm

13 Politics From: left-right spectrum, politics as collective action problem – who gets what when and how? To: Perhaps collective action, social movements, and directed social change are impossible. – Radical relativism – Everything is power – Politics, since it assumes concept of “right,” is pointless After http://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htmhttp://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htm

14 Differences FROM: lumping and splitting TO: rejection of “metanarratives” – Reject grand theory, don’t try to explain all of society – Focus on variety of experiences of individuals and groups – Emphasize differences over common experiences. – World is fragmented, disordered, unstable and not understandable on a large scale – Interpret texts, but never impose your interpretation on others After http://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htmhttp://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htm

15 Reflexivity FROM: reflection (and reflection on reflection) can yield knowledge/truth about the world TO: reflection only reveals the conditions of itself – Social science, philosophy, etc. created possibility of knowledge of social world. – Models can represent the natural and social world. – More and more it is difficult to distinguish images of reality from the reality itself (TV, sampling, marketing) After http://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htmhttp://uregina.ca/~gingrich/a400.htm

16 …full of sound and fury… …and signifying what? or after all that, can we still do theory?

17 Embrace the Dualities Structure and Agency Making history but not from whole cloth Langue and Parole

18 Structure and Agency

19 Marx : “The Eighteenth Brummaire” Man makes his own history, but he does not make it out of the whole cloth; he does not make it out of conditions chosen by himself, but out of such as he finds close at hand. The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living. And just as they seem to be occupied with revolutionizing themselves and things, creating something that did not exist before, precisely in such epochs of revolutionary crisis they anxiously conjure up the spirits of the past to their service, borrowing from them names, battle slogans, and costumes in order to present this new scene in world history in time-honored disguise and borrowed language.

20 Langue & Parole La langue is the whole system of language (spelling, grammar, syntax, vocabulary, etc.) that precedes and makes speech possible. Signs are the basic units of langue. Parole is the actual use of language, the practical utterances of everyday people.

21 Destinations Giddens/Bourdieu – Structuration – duality – fields – embedded agency Collins – Confict theory POMO practicalis – dialectics and tensions, sociology of knowledge, networks, global flows of knowledge and capitals POMO extremis – re-particularization, impossibility of theorizing Computational Social Science – Emergence, self-organizing systems

22 OUTTAKES

23 The structural in post-structural Everything depends on everything else Presence of absence

24 All the words not used All the words not used word

25 Marx Capitalism is different Us vs. them dynamic “seeds of its own destruction” dehumanizing

26 Weber


Download ppt "After Modernity Fall 2010. Outline Marx, Weber, Durkheim’s subject matter Grand Theory – Science, structuralism, Principia, Taylorism, Fordism Contra-Grand."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google