Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMadalynn Makin Modified over 2 years ago

1
DVCS at JLab Como, 11/06/2013

2
JLab published 6 GeV results JLab 6GeV analysis in progress JLab 12 GeV program

3
JLab published 6 GeV results JLab 6GeV analysis in progress JLab 12 GeV program

4
JLab Duty cycle 100% E max 6 GeV P max 80%

5
LH 2 / LD 2 target Polarized Electron Beam Scattered Electron N Nucleon Detector Left HRS Charged Particle Tagger Electromagnetic Calorimeter HALL A DVCS@JLab ep ep

6
H(e,e’ )X H(e,e’ p) H(e,e’ )X - H(e,e’ ’)X' H(e,e’ )N DVCS : exclusivity Good resolution : no need for the proton array Remaining contamination 1.7% HRS+calorimeter ep -> ep ep -> ep 0 0 -> ep -> ep 0 ep -> ep 0 N … HRS+calorimeter + proton array

7
DVCSBethe-Heitler GPDs

8
Using the (first version) of the BKM formalism, one can extract a combination of the “Im” CFFs and their Q 2 -dependence

9
e’ p ep ep 420 PbWO 4 crystals : ~10x10 mm 2, l=160 mm Read-out : APDs +preamps JLab/ITEP/ Orsay/Saclay collaboration HALL B DVCS@JLab

10
CLAS DVCS A LU ~0.16,-t~0.31,Q 2 ~1.82 CLAS DVCS A UL

11
Given the well-established LT-LO DVCS+BH amplitude DVCSBethe-Heitler GPDs Can one recover the 8 CFFs from the DVCS observables?

12
In general, 8 GPD quantities accessible (Compton Form Factors) with

13
Given the well-established LT-LO DVCS+BH amplitude DVCSBethe-Heitler GPDs Obs= Amp(DVCS+BH) CFFs Can one recover the 8 CFFs from the DVCS observables? Two (quasi-) model-independent approaches to extract, at fixed x B, t and Q 2 (« local » fitting), the CFFs from the DVCS observables (leading-twist formalism)

14
1/ «Brute force » fitting 2 minimization (with MINUIT + MINOS) of the available DVCS observables at a given x B, t and Q 2 point by varying the CFFs within a limited hyper-space (e.g. 5xVGG) M.G. EPJA 37 (2008) 319M.G. & H. Moutarde, EPJA 42 (2009) 71 M.G. PLB 689 (2010) 156M.G. PLB 693 (2010) 17 The problem can be (largely) undersconstrained: JLab Hall A: pol. and unpol. X-sections JLab CLAS: BSA + TSA 2 constraints and 8 parameters ! However, as some observables are largely dominated by a single or a few CFFs, there is a convergence (i.e. a well-defined minimum 2 ) for these latter CFFs. The contribution of the non-converging CFF entering in the error bar of the converging ones.

15
UL ~ sin Im{F 1 H + (F 1 +F 2 )( H + x B /2 E ) – kF 2 E+… }d ~ ~ LU ~ sin Im{F 1 H + (F 1 +F 2 ) H -kF 2 E }d ~ 2/ Mapping and linearization If enough observables measured, one has a system of 8 equations with 8 unknowns Given reasonnable approximations (leading-twist dominance, neglect of some 1/Q 2 terms,...), the system can be linear (practical for the error propagation) K. Kumericki, D. Mueller, M. Murray, arXiv:1301.1230 hep-ph, arXiv:1302.7308 hep-ph

16
unpol.sec.eff. + beam pol.sec.eff. 2 minimization

17
unpol.sec.eff. + beam pol.sec.eff. 2 minimization beam spin asym. + long. pol. tar. asym

18
unpol.sec.eff. + beam pol.sec.eff. 2 minimization beam spin asym. + long. pol. tar. asym beam charge asym. + beam spin asym + … linearization

19
unpol.sec.eff. + beam pol.sec.eff. 2 minimization beam spin asym. + long. pol. tar. asym beam charge asym. + beam spin asym + … linearization VGG model KM10 model/fit Moutarde 10 model/fit

20
Current extractions of CFFs from DVCS The sea quarks (low x) spread to the periphery of the nucleon while the valence quarks (large x) remain in the center H Im :the t-slope reflects the size of the probed object (Fourier transf.) 2 minimization linearization VGG model Moutarde 10 model/fit KM10 model/fit

21
Nucleon tomography

22
The axial charge (~H im ) appears to be more « concentrated » than the electromagnetic charge (~H im ) ~ 2 minimization linearization VGG model

23
JLab published 6 GeV results JLab 6GeV analysis in progress JLab 12 GeV program

24
CLAS : « e1-dvcs 1» (2005) and « e1dvcs2 » (2008) Analysis of the (pol. and unpol.) DVCS cross-sections Several DVCS analysis under way with JLab 6 GeV data:

25
CLAS : « e1-dvcs 1» (2005) and « e1dvcs2 » (2008) Analysis of the (pol. and unpol.) DVCS cross-sections Four main analyzers: H.-S. Jo, F.-X. Girod, B. Guegan, N. Saylor from whom I borrowed a lot of material/slides and whom contribution is greatly acknowledged Several DVCS analysis under way with JLab 6 GeV data:

26
CLAS : « e1-dvcs 1» (2005) and « e1dvcs2 » (2008) Analysis of the (pol. and unpol.) DVCS cross-sections Four main analyzers: H.-S. Jo, F.-X. Girod, B. Guegan, N. Saylor from whom I borrowed a lot of material/slides and whom contribution is greatly acknowledged « eg1dvcs » (2008) Analysis of the long.pol. target asymmetries Several DVCS analysis under way with JLab 6 GeV data:

27
CLAS : « e1-dvcs 1» (2005) and « e1dvcs2 » (2008) Analysis of the (pol. and unpol.) DVCS cross-sections Four main analyzers: H.-S. Jo, F.-X. Girod, B. Guegan, N. Saylor from whom I borrowed a lot of material/slides and whom contribution is greatly acknowledged « eg1dvcs » (2008) Analysis of the long.pol. target asymmetries Several DVCS analysis under way with JLab 6 GeV data: Hall A : Rosenbluth separation of the DVCS cross-section (separation of DVCS and BH contributions)

28
Samples of CLAS « e1-dvcs2 » analysis 5.88 GeV beam energy

29
Samples of CLAS « e1-dvcs2 » analysis 5.88 GeV beam energy

34
Data MC Ratio Acceptances

36
Elastic cross section from « e1-dvcs2 »

41
Thanks to I. Akushevich

47
How to go from momentum coordinates (t) to space-time coordinates (b) ? (with error propagation) Burkardt (2000) From CFFs to spatial densities Applying a (model-dependent) “deskewing” factor: and, in a first approach, neglecting the sea contribution

54
JLab published 6 GeV results JLab 6GeV analysis in progress JLab 12 GeV program

55
JLab Upgrade to 12 GeVCHL-2 Enhance equipment in existing halls Add new hall

57
GPD program at JLab 12 GeV (Halls A, B and C) (Halls A, B and C) DVCS beam asymmetry A LU on proton&neutron DVCS long. target spin asymmetry A UL on proton&neutron DVCS long. target spin asymmetry A UT on proton&neutron DVCS unpolarized cross sections on proton DVMP: pseudoscalar mesons DVMP: vector mesons

58
Simulations Hall A@12GeV Precision study of the Q 2 scaling law Validation of the GPD formalism, Estimation of the higher twist corrections 90 days of DVCS L~10 38 cm -2 s -1

59
E12-06-119 Similar studies for A UL,A UT,A LL,A LT,… as well

60
Projections for CLAS12 for H Im

61
Corresponding spatial densities

63
= 60° x B = 0.2 Q 2 = 2 GeV 2 t = -0.2 GeV 2 DVCS BSA: sensitivity to J u,d DVCS on the proton J u =.3, J d =.1 J u =.8, J d =.1 J u =.5, J d =.1 J u =.3, J d =.8 J u =.3, J d =-.5 E e = 11 GeV

64
= 60° x B = 0.17 Q 2 = 2 GeV 2 t = -0.4 GeV 2 n-DVCS BSA is: very sensitive to J u, J d can be as strong as for the proton According to the kinematics and Ju, Jd DVCS on the neutron J u =.3, J d =.1 J u =.8, J d =.1 J u =.5, J d =.1 J u =.3, J d =.8 J u =.3, J d =-.5 E e = 11 GeV DVCS BSA: sensitivity to Ju,Jd

Similar presentations

OK

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering and Pseudoscalar Meson Electroproduction with CLAS Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab XII Workshop on High Energy Spin Physics.

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering and Pseudoscalar Meson Electroproduction with CLAS Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab XII Workshop on High Energy Spin Physics.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google