Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byLaney Lassiter Modified over 2 years ago

1
**SOIL MECHANICS, ROCK MECHANICS AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES **

ANALYSIS ON MICROCOMPUTERS USING PLASTICITY THEORY: AN INTRODUCTION TO Z_SOIL.PC 2D/3D OUTLINE Short courses taught by A. Truty, K.Podles, Th. Zimmermann & coworkers in Lausanne, Switzerland August (1.5days), EVENT I: Z_SOIL.PC 2D course , at EPFL room CO121, 09:00 August (1.5days), EVENT II: Z_SOIL.PC 3D course , at EPFL room CO121, 14:00 participants need to bring their own computer: min 1GB RAM

2
LECTURE 1 - Problem statement Stability analysis Load carrying capacity Initial state analysis

3
**Starting with an ENGINEERING DRAFT**

4
PROBLEM COMPONENTS - EQUILIBRIUM OF 2-PHASE PARTIALLY SATURATED MEDIUM - NON TRIVIAL INITIAL STATE - NONLINEAR MATERIAL BEHAVIOR(elasticity is not applic.) - POSSIBLY GEOMETRICALLY NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR - TIME DEPENDENT -GEOMETRY -LOADS -BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

5
**DISCRETIZATION IS NEEDED FOR NUMERICAL SOLUTION**

e.g. by finite elements Equilibrium on (dx ● dy)

6
**EQUILIBRIUM STATEMENT, 1-PHASE**

Domain Ω, with boundary conditions: -imposed displacements -surface loads and body forces: -gravity(usually) 12 +(12 /x2)dx2 12 f1 equilibrium 11 11+(11/x1)dx1 x2 x1 dx1 direction 1: (11/x1)dx1dx2+(12 /x2) dx1dx2+ f1dx1dx2=0 L(u)= ij/xj + fi=0, differential equation(sum on j)

7
**SOLID(1-phase) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS**

2.natural: on , 0 by default sliding fixed 1.essential: on d,

8
**FORMAL DIFFERENTIAL PROBLEM STATEMENT**

Deformation(1-phase): (equilibrium) (displ.boundary cond.) (traction bound. cond.) Incremental elasto-plastic constitutive equation:

9
**WHY elasto-PLASTICITY?**

non coaxiality of stress and strain increments 2.unloading elastic E plastic E sand

10
**CONSTITUTIVE MODEL: ELASTIC-PERFECTLY PLASTIC**

1- dimensional E y Remark: this problem is non-linear

11
**CONSTITUTIVE MODEL: ELASTIC- PLASTIC**

With hardening(or softening) dimensional hardening E y Eep H’ softening

12
NB: -softening will engender mesh dependence of the solution -some sort of regularization is needed in order to recover mesh objectivity -a charateristic length will be requested from the user when a plastic model with softening is used (M-W e.g.)

13
SURFACE FOUNDATION: FROM LOCAL TO GLOBAL NONLINEAR RESPONSE

14
**The problems we tackle in geomechanics are always nonlinear, **

REMARK The problems we tackle in geomechanics are always nonlinear, they require linearization, iterations, and convergence checks F 4.out of balance force after 1 iteration N(d),unknown Fn+1 6.Out of balance after 2 iterations <=>Tol.? 2.F Fn F(x,t) 5.linearized problem it.2 3.linearized problem it.1 1.Converged sol. at tn(Fn,dn) d d dn 1 dn+1

15
**TOLERANCES ITERATIVE ALGORITHMS**

17
**INITIAL STATE, STABILITY AND**

ULTIMATE LOAD ANALYSIS IN SINGLE PHASE MEDIA

18
** ( imposed, 0 by default)**

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS (cut.inp) Single phase problem ( imposed, 0 by default) domain = +u u (u imposed)

19
WE MUST DEFINE: -GEOMETRY & BOUNDARY CONDITIONS -MATERIALS -LOADS -ALGORITHM

20
**a tutorial is available**

21
**GEOMETRY & BOUNDARY CONDITIONS**

start by defining the geometry

22
**Geometry with box-shaped**

boundary conditions

23
**MATERIAL & WEIGHT: MOHR-COULOMB**

24
GRAVITY LOAD

25
**ALGORITHM: STABILITY DRIVER**

Single phase

26
Assume STABILITY ALGORITHM with s then Algorithm: -set C’= C/SF tan ’=(tan )/SF -increase SF till instability occurs

27
**ALTERNATIVE SAFETY FACTOR DEFINITIONS**

SF1: SF1= =m+s SF2: C’=C/SF2 tan’= tan/SF2 SF3: C’=C/SF3

28
**ALGORITHM: STABILITY DRIVER**

ALTERNATIVE SAFETY FACTOR DEFINITIONS 2D Single phase

29
RUN

30
**VISUALIZATION OF INSTABILITY**

Displacement intensities

31
**LAST CONVERGED vs DIVERGED STEP**

32
LOCALISATION 1 Transition from distributed to localized strain

33
LOCALISATION 2

34
VALIDATION Slope stability 1984

35
**ELIMINATION OF LOCAL INSTABILITY 1 SF=1.4- Material 2, stability**

disabled SF=1.4+ Slope_Stab_loc_Terrasse.inp

36
**ULTIMATE LOAD ANALYSIS(foota.inp)**

INITIAL STATE, STABILITY AND ULTIMATE LOAD ANALYSIS(foota.inp) IN SINGLE PHASE MEDIA

37
WE MUST DEFINE: -GEOMETRY & BOUNDARY CONDITIONS (+-as before) -MATERIALS( +-as before) -LOADS and load function -ALGORITHM

38
**DRIVEN LOAD ON A SURFACE FOUNDATION Po(x) F(x,t)**

F=Po(x)*LF(t) LF t foota.inp

39
REMARK It is often safer to use driven displacements to avoid taking a numerical instability for a true failure, then: F=uo(x)*LF(t)

40
LOAD FUNCTIONS

41
**ALGORITHM: DRIVEN LOAD DRIVER**

axisymmetric analysis) =single phase

42
D-P material

43
**DRUCKER-PRAGER & MISES CRITERIA**

VON MISES Identification with Mohr-Coulomb requires size adjustment

44
**STRESS INVARIANTS 3D YIELD CRITERIA ARE EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF**

I1=tr = kk =3 = 11+22+33 ; 1st stress invariant J2=0.5 tr s**2=0.5 sij sji ; 2nd invariant of deviatoric stress tensor J3=(1/3) sij sjk ski ; 3rd invariant of deviatoric stress tensor

45
SIZE ADJUSTMENTS D-P vs M-C 3-dimensional,external apices 3-dimensional,internal apices Plane strain failure with (default) Axisymmetry intermediate adj. (default)

46
PLASTIC FLOW M-C(M-W) associated with D-P in deviatoric plane associated with D-P in deviatoric plane dilatant flow in meridional plane

47
run footwt.inp

48
SEE LOGFILE

49
LOG FILE

50
**SIGNS OF FAILURE: Localized displacements**

before at failure scales are different!

51
REMARK When using driven loads,there is always a risk of taking numerical divergence for the ultimate load: use preferably driven displacements

52
**DIVERGENCE VS NON CONVERGENCE**

F F >>d = d NON CONVERGENCE F F >cst.>TOL. d

53
**COMPUTATION OF ULTIMATE LOAD**

LF P=10 kN 2 1.5 1 F(x,t)=P(x)*LF(t) 10 20 30 t last converged step Fult.=P*LF(t=20)=10*1.5=15 kN

54
LAST CONVERGED STEP DIVERGED STEP

55
**DISPLACEMENT TIME-HISTORY**

56
**VALIDATION OF LOAD BEARING CAPACITY**

plane strain after CHEN 1975

57
MORE GENERAL CASES: Embedded footing with water table Remarks: Can be solved as single phase Watch for local “cut” instabilities

58
VALIDATION OF LOAD BEARING CAPACITY axisymmetry

59
**INITIAL STATE ANALYSIS (env.inp)**

Superposition of gravity+o(gravity)+preexisting loads* yields: (gravity)+ (prexist. loads) and NO DEFORMATION */ the ones with non-zero value at time t=0

60
PROOF - -

61
**2. LOCAL (MATERIAL LEVEL)**

1.GLOBAL LEVEL

62
INITIAL STATE CASE Compute initial state Add stories

63
ENV.INP DRIVERS SEQUENCE simulation of increasing number of stories

64
**INITIAL STATE ANALYSIS**

env.inp Initial state stress level Ultimate load displacements

65
REMARKS 1.The initial state driver applies gravity and loads which are nonzero at time t=0, progressively, to avoid instabilities 2.Failure to converge may occur during initial state analysis, switching to driven load may help identifying the problem 3.Nonlinear behavior, flow, and two-phase behavior are accounted for in the initial state analysis

66
END LECTURE 1

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google