Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

This guide is intended to assist the user in the application of BRAINSImageEval and to clarify the reviewer’s evaluation of T1, T2 and PD images.BRAINSImageEval.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "This guide is intended to assist the user in the application of BRAINSImageEval and to clarify the reviewer’s evaluation of T1, T2 and PD images.BRAINSImageEval."— Presentation transcript:

1 This guide is intended to assist the user in the application of BRAINSImageEval and to clarify the reviewer’s evaluation of T1, T2 and PD images.BRAINSImageEval Kathy Jones and Jacquie Marietta April 2012 Quality Analysis of raw MRI scans using BRAINSImageEval

2 A Brief Description of MRI An MR system consists of the following components: 1) a large magnet to generate the magnetic field 2) shim coils to make the magnetic field as homogeneous as possible 3) a radiofrequency (RF) coil to transmit a radio signal into the body part being imaged 4) a receiver coil to detect the returning radio signals 5) gradient coils to provide spatial localization of the signals 6) a computer to reconstruct the radio signals into the final image The signal intensity on the MR image is determined by four basic parameters: 1) proton density 2) T1 relaxation time 3) T2 relaxation time 4) flow Proton density is the concentration of protons in the tissue in the form of water and macromolecules (proteins, fat, etc). The T1 and T2 relaxation times define the way that the protons revert back to their resting states after the initial RF pulse. The most common effect of flow is loss of signal from rapidly flowing arterial blood. Source: Basic principles of MR imaging John R. Hesselink, MD, FACR

3 Examples of MRI scans Scan types: T1 - longitudinal relaxation time T2 - transverse relaxation time PD - proton density axial coronal sagittal Note: T2 and PD scans are acquired together

4 A Brief Description of Scan Artifacts An image artifact is a structure not normally present but visible as a result of a limitation or malfunction in the hardware or software of the MRI device, or in other cases a consequence of environmental influences as heat or humidity or it can be caused by the human body (blood flow, implants etc.). The knowledge of MRI artifacts and noise producing factors is important for continuing maintenance of high image quality. Artifacts may be very noticeable or just a few pixels out of balance but can give confusing artifactual appearances with pathology that may be misdiagnosed. Changes in patient position, different pulse sequences, metallic artifacts, or other imaging variables can cause image distortions, which can be reduced by the operator; artifacts due to the MR system may require a service engineer. Many types of artifacts may occur in magnetic resonance imaging. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging are typically classified as to their basic principles, e.g.: Physiologic (motion, flow) Hardware (electromagnetic spikes, ringing) Inherent physics (chemical shift, susceptibility, metal) Source: Magnetic Resonance – Technology Information Portal

5 Raw scan review using BRAINSImageEVAL Raw scan review is the process by which the quality of scanned images are individually reviewed and rated for either inclusion or exclusion in the Iowa automated neural network (ANN). BRAINSImageEvalBRAINSImageEval is a standardized system for reviewing raw scans to be used in the Iowa ANN. Ratings are given for T1, T2 and PD images based on Signal to Noise (SNR), Contrast to Noise (CNR) and each scan slice receives close visual inspection for lesions, artifacts and other issues in the coronal, axial and sagittal planes. These ratings are combined to create the overall quality assessment (QA) score ranging from 0-10 and each scan must score a 6 or greater to be included in the ANN. Visual quality analysis is critical to quality control and there are significant reasons why scans may not be included in the ANN and/or data analysis, such as incomplete acquisition or significant scan artifacts. Each Predict-HD scan is reviewed using BRAINSImageEval software. NOTE: We provide no radiological or neurological reading of the MRI. The scans are reviewed for motion and other artifacts by research assistants as a matter of basic visual analysis. See the Ethics Core Question document on SharePoint for more information: Home - Imaging Quality ControlHome - Imaging Quality Control

6 Using BRAINSImageEval Scripts to run BRAINSImageEval: LINUX: /hjohnson/NAMIC/BRAINSImageEval-bin/BRAINSImageEval MAC: /hjohnson/NAMIC/BRAINSImageEval-bin/BRAINSImageEval.OSX BRAINSImageEval basics: –A–All scans start out with a zero (0) overall QA rating. –A–All scans with a rating of 5 or less are excluded from the ANN and MUST include reasons for exclusion. –A–All scans must include the axial, coronal, and sagittal views. –A–All scans with lesions or ANY missing brain tissue are rated zero (0) Toolbar buttons: –F–FINISH EVALUATION – review of current scan is complete. Next scan automatically loads for review. –S–SKIP THIS IMAGE – skips current scan. Skipped scans reload the next time BRAINSImageEval is run. –S–SHOW COMPLETED EVALS – opens a temporary file that lists the scans currently being reviewed. –E–EXIT – exit BRAINSImageEval. INFO (scan label): The scan label includes the scan identifiers (e.g. PHD, FMRI, or NAMIC); the site number; the scanID; the sessionID; and the scan type (T1, T2, PD) Example: ScanIdentifier_site_scanID_sessionID_scantype PHD_XXX_XXXX_XXXXX-3-T1

7 The Image Evaluation form USING THE TEXT BOX: Required – reasons for exclusion Optional – any notes of interest USING BRAINSImageEval: Review the image using scroll bars Click to select issues Scroll to select SNR,CNR and QA scores A QA score of 0-5 requires notation USING THE KEYBOARD TO SCROLL: Click in the image window to activate  Left & right arrows – axial  Up & down arrows – coronal  Ctrl left & right arrows – sagittal USING THE MOUSE BUTTONS: Click in the image window to activate Right – zooms image Middle – moves image Left – adjusts image contrast type notes here... BRAINSImageEval Toolbar scan_ID username

8 BRAINSImageEval rating scale 0 = bad -Any scan with disqualifying scan issues, e.g. incomplete coverage or lesions. Scan will be excluded from the ANN- Text box notation is required.Text box notation is required. 1-5 = poor - A low quality scan and/or major scan issues. Scan will be excluded from the ANN – Text box notation is required.Text box notation is required. 6-7 = acceptable - An average scan and/or minor scan issues. 8-9 = good - A better than average scan with minimal scan issues. 10 = excellent – A high quality scan, the SNR and CNR are scored 10 each and there are no other issues.

9 BRAINSImageEval rating criteria Click on any scan issue for more information and links to several examples: Normal variants – non-lesion variations to anatomy, e.g. atrophy, large ventricles or cerebellar cysts. Lesions – variations to anatomy indicated by circumscribed brain tissue that appear to be lesions. SNR (0-10) – Signal to Noise Ratio - the overall CLARITY of a scan, e.g. speckling or background noise. CNR (0-10) – Contrast to Noise Ratio - the overall CONTRAST of the scan, e.g. gray to white tissue differentiation. Full Brain Coverage – complete brain coverage is required – scans are excluded if any portion of a brain tissue is missing. Misalignment – poor head positioning in scanner, e.g. tilting of head; any up & down or side-to-side motion of the head. Swap/Wrap Around – aliasing artifact due to improper field of view (FOV) or inhomogeneity, e.g. wrap or Moiré fringe. Ghosting / Motion – caused by movement and generally observed throughout the scan, e.g. blurriness, bands or rings. Inhomogeneity – caused by non-uniform signal intensity within a scan, e.g. banding or bias. Susceptibility / Metal –magnetic susceptibility resulting in artifact at tissue borders, e.g. metals, sinuses or eyes. Flow artifact – motion artifact due to fluid movement, e.g. blood flow in the temporal lobes. Truncation – abrupt signal intensity change artifact, e.g. ringing or ripple effect, usually observed at the edge of the brain. Overall QA assessment (0-10) – the overall score is determined by SNR and CNR scores and any additional scan issues.

10 Unusual or minor non-lesion anatomical changes are considered normal variants and include: Cortical atrophy Enlarged Virchow-Robin spaces Enlarged ventricles Cerebellar cysts Normal variants are not generally exclusionary. Scans are rated as any other scan and the variant’s effect reduces the overall score of the scan accordingly. Include notation in the text box. Back to rating criteria Normal Variants

11 Severe atrophy - overall rating 8

12 Virchow-Robin - overall rating 8

13 Enlarged Ventricles in T1 - overall rating 6

14 Cerebellar cyst - overall rating 6

15 LesionsLesions are defined as anatomical abnormalities. They appear as circumscribed regions of tissue within the brain as bright white signal in T2 and as dark signal in T1. Lesions are exclusionary and should be marked as zero (0). A note must be included in the text box. Back to rating criteria Lesions

16 Lesion - overall rating 0

17 SNRSNR = Signal to Noise Ratio is indicated by scan CLARITY. SNR rates the amount of speckling or noise in scan and is significant in evaluating the image quality for use in the ANN. Good SNR has little or no noise and the brain structures are clearly visible. Back to rating criteria SNR

18 SNR with noise - rating 6

19 CNRCNR = Contrast to Noise Ratio is indicated by scan CONTRAST. CNR rates the differentiation in tissue classifications which is vital in segmentation for the ANN. Good CNR has distinct gray/white tissue boundaries and the brain structures are clearly visible. Back to rating criteria CNR

20 CNR with low contrast - rating 5

21 Full brain coverage is required for inclusion into the ANN. Coverage is considered incomplete when any portion of theincomplete brain tissue is missing. Scroll carefully through each slice in all planes. IncompleteIncomplete scans are rated zero (0). Must include a notation in text field. Back to rating criteria Full Brain Coverage

22 Incomplete scan - overall rating 0

23 Incomplete scan - overall rating 0

24 Misalignment Misalignment can be identified by scrolling through the coronal slices and noting the up and down or side-to-side motion of the head. The sagittal view often shows the stair-step image acquisition. sagittal view Misalignment can also be poor positioning of the head in the scanner, e.g. significant tilting of the head. MisalignmentMisalignment can make the scan unusable for the ANN. Back to rating criteria

25 Misalignment in PD - overall rating 2

26 Misalignment in PD - overall rating 2

27 Misalignment in PD - overall rating 1

28 Swap / Wraparound WraparoundWraparound is indicated by structures appearing to be in the wrong location within the scan, e.g. nose wrapped into posterior brain tissue. Another example is Moiré fringe which appears as light and dark coils or cross-hatches within the brain. coilscross-hatches Aliasing is not exclusionary unless it interferes with brain tissue and/or structures. Back to rating criteria

29 Nose wrap - overall rating 0

30 Moiré fringe - overall rating 7

31 Moiré fringe - overall rating 5

32 Ghosting / Motion is a repetitive pattern extending across the entire field of view (FOV). It is visible inside and outside of the skull. This is one of the most common imaging artifacts. It is indicated by waves, blurring, mirror images, bright shadowing, symmetrical rings inside and outside of the brain.wavesblurringmirror images, bright shadowing symmetrical rings The severity determines the usability of the scan.severity Back to rating criteria Ghosting / Motion

33 Motion in T1 - overall rating 5

34 Motion in T2 - overall rating 3

35 Motion in T1 - overall rating 2

36 Motion in T1 - overall rating 1

37 Motion in T1 - overall rating 0

38 Inhomogeneity Inhomogeneity is inconsistent gray white tissue intensity within a scan. Unlike CNR, inhomogeneity is indicated by bias and banding in portions of the scan, while CNR is the overall contrast throughout the entire image.bias banding Look for variations of intensity, bias, which is most easily viewed as light and dark shadowing at the anterior/posterior poles and/or contrasting bands visible in all views. Loss of gray white tissue delineation can result in the exclusion of the scan.biaspoles contrasting bands Back to rating criteria

39 Banding - overall rating 2

40 Banding - overall rating 1

41 Bias - overall rating 7

42 Bias - overall rating 6

43 Bias and banding in PD - overall rating 1

44 Susceptibility / Metal Susceptibility/metal artifact is indicated by a light or dark signal in regions of adjacent materials or tissues. Examples are: – metal artifact such as dental bracesmetal artifact – the sinus bone junctionsinus bone junction – the tissue between the eyesbetween the eyes – zipper artifact which is seen as alternating bright and dark pixels in a linezipper artifact resembling a zipper. The rating depends on the amount of interference within the tissue. Back to rating criteria

45 Susceptibility artifact in T1 - overall rating 0

46 Artifact from sinus/bone junction - overall rating 0

47 Susceptibility artifact between eyes in T1 - overall rating 8

48 Susceptibility artifact between eyes in T1 - overall rating 7

49 Susceptibility / Zipper artifact - overall rating 7

50 Flow Artifact Flow artifact is susceptibility due to blood flow and is usually seen as hatched lines in the temporal lobes.hatched lines Flow artifacts are infrequent and usually do not effect the rating. Back to rating criteria

51 Flow artifact in temporal lobes - overall rating 7

52 Truncation Truncation artifacts are rings or waves seen around the outside edge of the brain but unlike ghosting, they diminish as they move toward the center. Truncation does not extend outside the brain. Truncation It is infrequent and rarely effects the ratings. Back to rating criteria

53 T1 Truncation artifact - overall rating 8

54 PD Truncation artifact - overall rating 7

55 Overall Quality Assessment The overall raw scan quality assessment (QA) is based on a combination of the SNR and CNR ratings in addition to the presence or absence of brain coverage, lesions, artifacts, or other scan issues. The ideal scan will rate a score of 10 each on SNR, CNR andideal scan overall QA and have no conditions selected in BRAINSImageEval. Back to rating criteria

56 Overall T1 scan quality - SNR rating 10 - CNR rating 10 - overall rating 10 - no other issues

57 Overall T1 scan quality - SNR rating 10 - CNR rating 1o - overall rating 9 - inhomogeneity

58 Overall T2 scan quality - SNR rating 10 - CNR rating 10 - overall rating 10 - no other issues


Download ppt "This guide is intended to assist the user in the application of BRAINSImageEval and to clarify the reviewer’s evaluation of T1, T2 and PD images.BRAINSImageEval."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google