1. Portable and Predictable Performance on Heterogeneous Embedded Manycores (ARTEMIS 295440) ARTEMIS Project Review October 2014 WP1 “Management and IPR” (Presented by: Olle Olsson, SICS) 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 20141

2. WP1: Management and IPR Objectives (reminder) : Establish/improve administrative framework of project Monitor project progress Manage quality assurance Manage IPR 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 20142

3. Tasks and Deliverables Tasks (reminder): T1.1 Implementation of project management structures T1.2 Project management T1.3 IPR management WP1 Deliverables for year 2: D1.4 Second Project Periodic Report: done D1.5 IPR management database table: Intermediate release: done 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 20143

4. Task T1.1 Implem. proj. structure Objectives (reminder) : Create structures, processes, methods … according to best practices. Assure that partners understand these. Specific actions for year 2: Creation of a Milestone Assessment Procedure: done Logically part of the ”Project Management Handbook” 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 20144

5. Task T1.2 Project Management Project-internal objectives (reminder) : Assure that the project works towards project objectives and that project effort is used in the best possible ways. Monitor project work: risks, … Evaluate results and objectives Etc. Project-external objectives (reminder) : Interact with ARTEMIS-JU Etc. 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 20145

6. Task T1.3 IPR Management Objectives for year 2: Monitor results and IPR claims. Update the IPR Management Database Deliverable for year 2: D1.5 IPR management database table: Intermediate release Specific actions initiated (related to T1.3) : Define a policy for public software results from project Main issues: What material results? Essential IPR claims? 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 20146

7. Governance of project During year 2: Business as usual Board; General Assembly; … 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 20147

8. Coordination within project At WP level Coordination, monitoring, and planning by organizing WP-specific teleconferences Physical meetings at project F2F meetings At project level Coordination, monitoring, and planning based on monthly teleconferences with WP leaders Physical Face-to-Face meetings Stockholm, October 2013 Bilbao, March 2014 At F2F meetings: Physical coordination meetings with 2 or more WPs 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 20148

9. Coordination with external world At WP level: initiatives to coordinate with other projects Example: WP6 (demonstrators) At project level: ARTEMIS Tools Platform HiPEAC Network of Excellence Dissemination and outreach activities in WP7 create opportunities for future coordination. 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 20149

10. Portable and Predictable Performance on Heterogeneous Embedded Manycores (ARTEMIS 295440) ARTEMIS Project Review October 2014 “Effort and Costs” (Presented by: Olle Olsson) 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 201410

11. Executive summary Aggregated actual effort spent is close to planned effort (1% over) Same for cost (3% under) For WPs: Deviations actual vs. plan for year 1 have decreased for accumulated year 1-2. Same holds for partners. 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 201411

12. Planned total effort across WPs 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 201412

13. Planned total effort across partners 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 201413

14. Year 1-2 effort across WPs 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 201414 In general: Y1-Y2 decreased % overspend/underspend relative to Y1.

15. Year 1-2 effort across partners 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 201415 In general: Y1-Y2 decreased % overspend/underspend Relative to Y1.

16. Effort outlook for year 3 With respect to major impact on project: WPs: Accumulated effort will reach planned total Y1-3 Partners: Overspenders: will still deliver planned effort Y3 Underspenders: will deliver Y3 plan + Y1-2 underspend Conclusion: No foreseen critical risk w.r.t. effort. 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 201416

17. ---end--- 2014-10-28ARTEMIS PaPP Review 201417