Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKyle Turnley Modified over 3 years ago

1
Intel Research Internet Coordinate Systems - 03/03/2004 Internet Coordinate Systems Marcelo Pias Intel Research Cambridge marcelo.pias@intel.com

2
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 2 Outline Motivation Problems General Approach Techniques Global Network Positioning (GNP) Practical Internet Coordinates (PIC) Lighthouses PCA-based techniques (Virtual Landmark and ICS) Conclusions Open Issues/Future work (PII projects)

3
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 3 Motivation Source: planet-lab.org What’s the closest server to a client in Brazil ? Geographical distances ------------------------------- server1 -> 4500 miles server2 -> 6000 miles …… Client Server

4
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 4 Motivation Difficulties: Geographical distances ≠ network distances Routing policies/Connectivity GPS not available Client needs ‘N’ distances to select the closest server

5
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 5 Motivation Source: planet-lab.org Network Latency (time) Network Latency ------------------------------- server1 -> 120 ms server2 -> 130 ms ……

6
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 6 Motivation Network latency = network distance E.g. ping measurements Still have the issue of ‘N’ distances… Need ‘N’ measurements (high overhead) Update list of network distances How do we solve this problem ?

7
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 7 Internet Coordinate System (x1,y1) (x2,y2) x y Difference between coordinates ≈ network distance Source: planet-lab.org

8
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 8 Outline Motivation Problems General Approach Techniques Global Network Positioning (GNP) Practical Internet Coordinates (PIC) Lighthouses PCA-based techniques (Virtual Landmark and ICS) Conclusions Open Issues/Future work (PII projects)

9
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 9 Problem Problem statement (graph embedding into a vector space): Find a scalable mapping α : H → V k, such that d(hi,hj) ≈ D(vi,vj), where: H is the original space (Internet graph) V is the target vector space of dimensionality K Example: H = {h1,h2,h3}; V = {v1,v2,v3}; d(h1,h2) ≈ D(v1,v2) Mapping h1 h2 20 ms 70 ms 80 ms h3 v1 (5,3) v2 (15,23) 22.36 ms 80 ms v3 (85,3) X Y 72.80 ms Internet

10
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 10 Outline Motivation Problems General Approach Techniques Global Network Positioning (GNP) Practical Internet Coordinates (PIC) Lighthouses PCA-based techniques (Virtual Landmark and ICS) Conclusions Open Issues/Future work (PII projects)

11
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 11 General Approach Tasks: 1) Select a subset of hosts for ‘reference points’ (RP) Create the origin of the coordinate system 2) Measure distances between RFs 3) Calculate coordinates for each RP 4) Measure distance between host and RFs 5) Calculate coordinates for the host Different proposed techniques for tasks 1,3 and 5 Reference points = landmarks, lighthouses, beacons

12
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 12 Outline Motivation Problems General Approach Techniques Global Network Positioning (GNP) Practical Internet Coordinates (PIC) Lighthouses PCA-based techniques (Virtual Landmark and ICS) Conclusions Open Issues/Future work (PII projects)

13
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 13 Global Network Positioning (GNP) T.S.E. Ng, H. Zhang [ACM IMW’01] Landmark coordinates L1 L2 L3 1) Landmark Selection (fixed set) 2) ‘L’ landmarks measure mutual network distances (ping) 3) Landmarks computes coordinates by minimizing the overall error between the measured and the estimated distances Multi-dimensional global minimisation problem minimise: error(d ij,D ij ) L1 L2 L3 x y (x1,y1) (x2,y2) (x3,y3) d 12 D 12

14
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 14 Host coordinates Internet L1 L2 L3 H 1) Host measures its network distances to the ‘L’ landmarks 2) Host computes its own coordinate relative to the Landmarks 3) Multi-dimensional global minimisation problem minimise: error(d ij,D ij ) x y (x1,y1) (x2,y2) (x3,y3) L1 L2 L3 H (x4,y4) Global Network Positioning (GNP)

15
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 15 Global Network Positioning (GNP) Issues: Landmark selection Fixed set Issues with landmark failures, landmark overload What’s the optimal selection ? Technique (Simplex downhill) Unique coordinates are not guaranteed Depends on the starting point for the algorithm

16
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 16 Practical Internet Coordinates (PIC) Costa, M. et al [IEEE ICDCS’04] Host coordinates 1) Any host who has already a computed coordinate can be a landmark 2) Host measures its network distances to the ‘L’ landmarks 3) Host computes its own coordinate relative to the Landmarks 4) Multi-dimensional global minimisation problem minimise: error(d ij,D ij ) H x y (x1,y1) (x2,y2) (x3,y3) H (x4,y4) H L2

17
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 17 Practical Internet Coordinates (PIC) PIC was tested in Pastry (Structured P2P system): Each node maintains a routing table with distances to closest nodes For a system with 20,000 nodes, a joining node needs to measure 297 distances Using a coordinate system reduces measurements to 32 probes Selection strategy Random: pick landmarks randomly Closest: pick landmarks ‘closest’ to the host Hybrid: pick landmarks as in random and others as in closest

18
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 18 Practical Internet Coordinates (PIC) Source: Costa, M. et al [ICDCS’04]

19
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 19 Lighthouses Pias, M. et al [IPTPS’03] Host selects the reference points (lighthouses) Coordinates computed using linear transformations Similarly to PIC, Lighthouses is scalable L1 L2 H1 L3 H2 L4 L5 L6

20
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 20 Lighthouses Lighthouses coordinates L1 L2 L3 Derive a distance matrix D = Computes an orthogonal basis (Gram-Schmidt) using QR decomposition: D = Q. R Q is the orthogonal basis that creates the coordinate system Each lighthouse is assigned a column vector of Q

21
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 21 Lighthouses Host coordinates 1) Host measures its network distances to the ‘L’ lighthouses 2) Distances of the host are projected onto the orthogonal basis: 3) Host coordinates H = Q. D, where D is the matrix with distances between the host and lighthouses H1 L1 L2 L3 d dx dy

22
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 22 PCA-based techniques (Virtual Landmarks and ICS) Tang, L, Crovella, M. [ACM IMC’03]: “Virtual Landmarks” Lim, H, Hou, J.C, Choi, C-H [ACM IMC’03]: “ICS” Larger number of landmarks/beacons (m) Derive a landmark distance matrix m x m Use Principal Component Analysis to derive an optimal basis

23
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 23 PCA-based techniques (Virtual Landmarks and ICS) Optimal basis using Singular Value Decomposition: D = U. W. V T Where columns of U are the principal components and form an orthogonal basis U has ‘m’ columns (components) Use the first ‘k’ principal components that allow ‘good’ projections Pc1 Pc2

24
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 24 PCA-based techniques (Virtual Landmarks and ICS) Host Coordinates Linear projections on the first ‘k’ principal components H i = U T. d i Pc1 Pc2 H d

25
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 25 Outline Motivation Problems General Approach Techniques Global Network Positioning (GNP) Practical Internet Coordinates (PIC) Lighthouses PCA-based techniques (Virtual Landmark and ICS) Conclusions Open Issues/Future work (PII projects)

26
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 26 Conclusions Techniques explored: Error minimisation: GNP and PIC Linear projections: Lighthouses, Virtual Landmarks and ICS Applications Closest server selection (e.g. distributed network games) Network-aware construction of peer-to-peer systems Routing in mobile ad-hoc networks Network distance estimation Internet Coordinate System is promising but …

27
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 27 Open Issues/Future work Landmark placement How many dimensions do we need to create an “Internet Coordinate System” ? Some of the research suggested 6-9 dimensions However, different datasets give different values Routing policies x dimensionality x error PII projects (implementation): A distance estimation service on PlanetLab Closest node service on PlanetLab

28
Internet Coordinate Systems – 03/03/2004 Intel Research 28 Thank you!!!!

Similar presentations

OK

ECE 5970 02/24/2005 A Survey on Position-Based Routing in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Alok Sabherwal.

ECE 5970 02/24/2005 A Survey on Position-Based Routing in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Alok Sabherwal.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To ensure the functioning of the site, we use **cookies**. We share information about your activities on the site with our partners and Google partners: social networks and companies engaged in advertising and web analytics. For more information, see the Privacy Policy and Google Privacy & Terms.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.

Ads by Google

Ppt on campus recruitment system online Ppt on programming methodology for class 11 Ppt on remote operated spy robot with camera Ppt on natural numbers their opposites Ppt on french revolution class 9 Ppt on environmental degradation in india Ppt on human nutrition and digestion chapter Ppt on sea level rise due Ppt on indian company act 1956 Ppt on tamper resistant packaging