Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Christopher Lawrence SOC 680.  “Concerted cultivation” (Lareau 2003)  The home life to explain educational inequality (Jencks and Phillips (1998) 

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Christopher Lawrence SOC 680.  “Concerted cultivation” (Lareau 2003)  The home life to explain educational inequality (Jencks and Phillips (1998) "— Presentation transcript:

1 Christopher Lawrence SOC 680

2  “Concerted cultivation” (Lareau 2003)  The home life to explain educational inequality (Jencks and Phillips (1998)  Emphasis on language (Hart and Risley 1995) ◦ Word gap: amount and type  Home Observation Measurement of the Environment Home Observation Measurement of the Environment ◦ Becomes popular in 1990s

3  Ethnographic studies ◦ Small samples ◦ Not nationally representative  Empirical support for theory of concerted cultivation  Showing link to HOME score and years of education attained across categories of race and sex ◦ The “Intellectual Advantage”

4  National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Children and Young Adults (NLSY79 Child/YA) ◦ Offshoot of National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979  Looked at the unique effects of baby boomers on the labor market  NLSY79 Child/YA looks at the children of the mothers  Study sample = 2,429 ◦ Measured at two points in time (longitudinal)  1994 (HOME score): Ages 0-14  2010 (Years of Education): Ages 25-38

5  RQ1: Do home environment and education differ by race?  RQ2: Do home environment and education differ by sex?  RQ3: Do race and sex interact in the effect on home environment and education?

6  Null ◦ H 0 1: The HOME-SF score and years of education will not differ by race. ◦ H 0 2: The HOME-SF score and years of education will not differ by sex. ◦ H 0 3: Race and sex will not interact in the effect of the HOME-SF score and years of education.  Research ◦ H 1 1: The HOME-SF score and years of education will differ by race. ◦ H 1 2: The HOME-SF score and years of education will differ by sex. ◦ H 1 3: Race and sex will interact in the effect of the HOME-SF score and years of education. 

7  Assumptions ◦ Subjects randomly sampled and independent of one another ( ✓ ) ◦ Multivariate normal distribution ( ✓ ) ◦ Homogeneity of covariance matrices ( ✖ ) ◦ Linearity of dependent variables ( ✓ )

8

9

10  Evaluating the hypotheses.hypotheses  Reject: ◦ The HOME-SF score and years of education will not differ by race. ◦ The HOME-SF score and years of education will not differ by sex  Fail to reject: ◦ Race and sex will not interact in the effect of the HOME-SF score and years of education

11  Female Intellectual Advantage ◦ Bias in HOME ◦ Lack of father interaction ◦ Genetically more intelligent? ◦ “Feminization of education” ◦ Increase in service sector jobs that require a college education  White Intellectual Advantage ◦ Resources and economic background  Effects carry on through college  Future Research ◦ Add parental education and income as background variables

12 1. Did the study use a sample that was cross- sectional or longitudinal? 2. Was the interaction effect between race and sex significant? 3. Which two groups (e.g., whites, Hispanics, Blacks, males, females) showed the “intellectual advantage?”


Download ppt "Christopher Lawrence SOC 680.  “Concerted cultivation” (Lareau 2003)  The home life to explain educational inequality (Jencks and Phillips (1998) "

Similar presentations


Ads by Google