Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMiles Burman Modified over 9 years ago
2
We all have something in common…
3
Something we are doing right now…
4
What am I talking about? ?
5
Reading…
7
Clinical Question In children, does the use of pictures support literacy development? In children with developmental disabilities, does the use of pictures support learning to read new words?
9
cat b) cat c) a)
11
1 2
13
Results of Search Level of Evidence#Sources Level I Systematic review 0 ERIC Pubmed OVID CINAHL Web of Science Level I Randomised control trials 0 Level II 0 Level III 0 Level IV 8
14
Fading Study Dorry and Zeaman 1975
15
Condition 1 Picture and word presented Picture gradually faded
16
car
17
Condition 2 Picture and word Word alone OR
18
car
19
OR
20
car
21
Condition 3 Picture and word presented
22
car
23
Condition 4 Picture alone Word alone OR
26
car
27
Summary Dorry and Zeaman (1975) Printed word and picture. Picture gradually faded Either word and picture OR word alone Printed word and picture Picture alone or word alone
29
Fading Study Tabe and Jackson 1989
30
Condition 1 Word embedded in picture (superimposed) Picture gradually faded
31
car
32
Condition 2 Word embedded in picture (superimposed) Picture non-fading
33
car
34
Condition 3 Picture with word written on the side (juxtaposed) Picture gradually faded
35
car
36
Condition 4 Picture with word written on the side (juxtaposed) Picture non-fading
37
car
38
Summary Tabe and Jackson (1989) Superimposed fading Superimposed non-fading Juxtaposition fading Juxtaposition non-fading
40
Picture vs. Word Study Singh and Solman 1990
41
Condition A Picture Picture enhanced +
43
car 5 cm 2.5 cm
44
Condition B Word alone
45
car 2.5 cm
46
Condition C Word alone + Word enhanced
47
car
48
5 cm 2.5 cm
49
Condition D Word alone
50
car 5 cm
51
Summary Singh and Solman (1990) Picture (1 st slide) and picture enhanced (2 nd slide) Word alone Word (1 st slide) and word enhanced (2 nd slide) Word alone enhanced
53
Didden, Prinsen and Sigafoos 2000
54
Condition A - D Same as Singh and Solman (1990)
55
Condition E New condition Word alone and then…
56
car
57
2 seconds later
58
car
59
Summary Didden, Prinsen and Sigafoos (2000) Picture (1 st slide) and picture enhanced (2 nd slide) Word alone Word (1 st slide) and word enhanced (2 nd slide) Word alone enhanced Word alone then picture feedback
61
Didden, de Graaff, Nelemans, Vooren and Lancioni 2006
62
Condition 1 Word alone
63
car
64
Condition 2 Word embedded in picture
65
car
66
Condition 3 Faded with 4 steps
67
car
68
Summary Didden, de Gradd, Nelemans, Vooren and Lancioni (2006) Word alone Word embedded in picture Word and picture. Picture faded
70
Summary for Fading Studies Dorry and Zeaman 1975 Printed word and picture. Picture gradually faded. Hoogeveen, Smeets and Lancioni 1989 Fading pictorial elements. Tabe and Jackson 1989 Fading conditions (superimposed/juxtaposed)
71
Summary for Picture vs Word Singh and Solman 1990 Word alone Word alone enhanced Didden, Prinsen and Sigafoos 2000 Word alone then picture feedback Didden, de Gradd, Nelemans, Vooren and Lancioni 2006 Word alone Fossett and Mirenda 2006 Picture to text matching
73
Another interesting find…
74
차 Car.
75
집 A table and a bed next to a wall Furniture in a room. House.
76
Let’s try with Sight Words car
77
Make a handle… Cars go beep
78
What would this LOOK like? car
81
Clinical Question In children does the use of pictures support literacy development? No, presenting the WORD ALONE (i.e. without pictures) is more efficient when teaching children to read new words
82
a) cat b) cat c)
83
How might this effect clinical practice? -Advice to teachers -Information given to parents -Challenge current strategies used in the classroom and clinical practice
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.