Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice. Rights of the Accused A crime is an act against a law of the state. A crime is an act against a law of the state.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice. Rights of the Accused A crime is an act against a law of the state. A crime is an act against a law of the state."— Presentation transcript:

1 CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice

2 Rights of the Accused A crime is an act against a law of the state. A crime is an act against a law of the state. The challenge for Americans is to balance the rights of the people versus that of the accused. (The greater good) The challenge for Americans is to balance the rights of the people versus that of the accused. (The greater good) The BOR and the 14 th Amendment were designed to protect the rights of both. The BOR and the 14 th Amendment were designed to protect the rights of both.

3 The 4 th Amendment The police must state under oath that they have probable cause in order to get a search warrant. The police must state under oath that they have probable cause in order to get a search warrant. The search warrant is then very specific about place and things. The search warrant is then very specific about place and things. They may search a private home without a warrant only in life threatening emergencies. They may search a private home without a warrant only in life threatening emergencies. No warrant is needed if the police see someone breaking the law. (they have the right to arrest and seize for drugs in a minor traffic stop) No warrant is needed if the police see someone breaking the law. (they have the right to arrest and seize for drugs in a minor traffic stop)

4 Drug tests are considered a search but do not require a warrant if it is to protect public safety Drug tests are considered a search but do not require a warrant if it is to protect public safety Illegally obtained evidence may not be used in court. (This is now being challenged and even relaxed if the officers can prove they acted in good faith) Illegally obtained evidence may not be used in court. (This is now being challenged and even relaxed if the officers can prove they acted in good faith) The 4 th amendment is also relaxed in high schools. The 4 th amendment is also relaxed in high schools. All that is needed is reasonable grounds and a student may be searched at any time. All that is needed is reasonable grounds and a student may be searched at any time. The rules differ if the search is conducted by a police officer vs. a school official. The rules differ if the search is conducted by a police officer vs. a school official.

5 The 6 th Amendment Guarantees a defendant the right to counsel or an attorney. This mainly applies to federal courts. People can be tried in state courts without a lawyer. Guarantees a defendant the right to counsel or an attorney. This mainly applies to federal courts. People can be tried in state courts without a lawyer.

6 The 5 th Amendment (Self Incrimination) The government bears the burden of proof. The government bears the burden of proof. Defendants are not obliged to help the govt. prove they committed a crime or testify at their own trial. Defendants are not obliged to help the govt. prove they committed a crime or testify at their own trial. It protects against forcibly attained confessions or information. It protects against forcibly attained confessions or information. This amendment was later enforced more strongly when the Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona and established the Miranda rights for questioning subjects. This amendment was later enforced more strongly when the Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona and established the Miranda rights for questioning subjects.

7 Miranda v Arizona In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona for stealing $8 from bank worker and charged with armed robbery. He already had a record for armed robbery, and a juvenile record including attempted rape, assault, and burglary. While in police custody he signed a written confession to the robbery, and to kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman 11 days before the robbery. After the conviction, his lawyers appealed, on the grounds that Miranda did not know he was protected from self-incrimination. The case, Miranda v. Arizona, made it all the way to the Supreme Court, where the conviction was overthrown. In a landmark ruling issued in 1966, the court established that the accused have the right to remain silent and that prosecutors may not use statements made by defendants while in police custody unless the police have advised them of their rights, commonly called the Miranda Rights. The case was later re-tried, Miranda was convicted on the basis of other evidence, and served 11 years. He was paroled in 1972, and died in 1976 at the age of 34, after being stabbed in a bar fight. A suspect was arrested but chose to excercise his right to remain silent, and was released. In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona for stealing $8 from bank worker and charged with armed robbery. He already had a record for armed robbery, and a juvenile record including attempted rape, assault, and burglary. While in police custody he signed a written confession to the robbery, and to kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman 11 days before the robbery. After the conviction, his lawyers appealed, on the grounds that Miranda did not know he was protected from self-incrimination. The case, Miranda v. Arizona, made it all the way to the Supreme Court, where the conviction was overthrown. In a landmark ruling issued in 1966, the court established that the accused have the right to remain silent and that prosecutors may not use statements made by defendants while in police custody unless the police have advised them of their rights, commonly called the Miranda Rights. The case was later re-tried, Miranda was convicted on the basis of other evidence, and served 11 years. He was paroled in 1972, and died in 1976 at the age of 34, after being stabbed in a bar fight. A suspect was arrested but chose to excercise his right to remain silent, and was released.

8 5 th Amendment Continued (Double Jeopardy) Also deals with double jeopardy. Also deals with double jeopardy. It does not protect against someone being prosecuted criminally and then being tried civilly. It does not protect against someone being prosecuted criminally and then being tried civilly. A criminal act can be tried in both state and federal courts. A criminal act can be tried in both state and federal courts. A single act can involve multiple crimes and a suspect can be tried for each component of the event. A single act can involve multiple crimes and a suspect can be tried for each component of the event.

9 8 th Amendment Forbids cruel and unusual punishment Forbids cruel and unusual punishment The main controversy is whether or not the death penalty is cruel or unusual. What do you think? The main controversy is whether or not the death penalty is cruel or unusual. What do you think? Alabama's Electric Chair 1927 - 1965 153 Executions

10 11 7 10 Millions Schlosser Yates 5 1

11 Equal Protection of the Law “All men are created equal” as stated in the DOI really means that all are entitled to equal rights and treatment before the law. “All men are created equal” as stated in the DOI really means that all are entitled to equal rights and treatment before the law. This is shown in the 14 th amendment which grants equal protection under the law and really extends the 5 th amendment due process clause. The point is to keep the government from making distinctions among people based on classification. This is shown in the 14 th amendment which grants equal protection under the law and really extends the 5 th amendment due process clause. The point is to keep the government from making distinctions among people based on classification.

12 14 th Amendment Passed after the Civil War and is intended to grant rights to former slaves. Passed after the Civil War and is intended to grant rights to former slaves. However many states passed Jim crow laws which allowed legal segregation. However many states passed Jim crow laws which allowed legal segregation. Jim Crow laws were upheld by the Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson which put into place the principle of “separate but equal” Jim Crow laws were upheld by the Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson which put into place the principle of “separate but equal”

13 Brown vs Bd of Education Plessy vs. Ferguson stood until the 1950’s when it was overturned by Brown v. Bd of Education. This led to the Civil Rights Movement and the cooperation of many blacks and whites in an effort to bring about “equal” justice for all. Plessy vs. Ferguson stood until the 1950’s when it was overturned by Brown v. Bd of Education. This led to the Civil Rights Movement and the cooperation of many blacks and whites in an effort to bring about “equal” justice for all.


Download ppt "CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice. Rights of the Accused A crime is an act against a law of the state. A crime is an act against a law of the state."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google